Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 75, ISSUE 2, P93-95, February 2007

Download started.

Ok

Copper T 380A IUD and magnetic resonance imaging

      Abstract

      Background

      Concerns about women who have implanted or in situ medical devices undergoing magnetic resonance (MR) imaging engender the need for testing. Prior testing of the Copper T 380A intrauterine device (IUD) has been done using MR systems of 1.5 T or less. This study was performed to test this IUD in a MR system of 3.0 T.

      Materials and Methods

      In vitro safety testing was done via the Copper T 380A IUD using a GE Signa LX 3.0-T MR system. Variables tested included deflection, torque, heating and artifact.

      Results

      No significant deflection, torque, heating or artifact was found in this in vitro testing model.

      Conclusion

      The outcomes measured revealed no safety concerns for the use of the Copper T 380A IUD at 3.0 T under the conditions of testing. This finding is compatible with the new standards adopted by the American Society for Testing and Materials and the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), with a rating of ���MR Conditional.���

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Pasquale A.S.
        • Russer T.J.
        • Foldesy R.
        • Mezrich R.S.
        Lack of interaction between magnetic resonance imaging and the Copper-T380A IUD.
        Contraception. 1997; 55: 169-173
        • Mark A.S.
        • Hricak H.
        Intrauterine contraceptive devices: MR imaging.
        Radiology. 1987; 162: 311-314
        • Hess T.
        • Stepanow B.
        • Knopp M.V.
        Safety of intrauterine devices during MR imaging.
        Eur Radiol. 1996; 6: 66-68
        • Shellock F.G.
        New metallic implant used for permanent contraception in women: evaluation of MR safety.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 1513-1516
        • ASTM International
        Standard practice for marking medical devices and other items for safety in the magnetic resonance environment.
        (August 2005. Available from American National Standards Institute, 25 West 43rd Street, New York, NY 10036)
        • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation: F 2052
        Standard test method for measurement of magnetically induced displacement force on passive implants in the magnetic resonance environment.
        in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 13, Medical Devices and Services, Volume 13.01 Medical Devices. Emergency Medical Services, West Conshohocken (PA)2002: 1576-1580
        • Shellock F.G.
        Metallic and neurosurgical implants: evaluation of magnetic field interactions, heating, and artifacts at 1.5-Tesla.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001; 14: 295-299
        • American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Designation: F2182-02
        A standard test method for measurement of radio frequency induced heating near passive implants during magnetic resonance imaging.
        in: Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Section 13, Medical Devices and Services, Volume 13.01 Medical Devices. Emergency Medical Services, West Conshohocken (PA)2003