Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 75, ISSUE 2, P88-92, February 2007

Use of IUD and subsequent fertility ��� follow-up after participation in a randomized clinical trial

      Abstract

      Purpose

      Although the IUD has been a contraceptive method for about 50 years, how it affects subsequent fertility remains controversial. The aim of our study was to examine time to pregnancy, pregnancy outcome and the need for infertility workup in a cohort of previous copper IUD users.

      Materials and methods

      From May 1993 to April 1995, 957 women were included in a prospective cohort IUD study in the city of Trondheim, Norway. From this randomized clinical trial, we identified 205 women eligible for study participation. Group A comprised 109 women who removed their IUD for purposes of planning to become pregnant, while Group B comprised 96 women who became pregnant or planned pregnancy after a complicated IUD use. Data were collected through a postal questionnaire. All information from the questionnaires was validated against data kept in the medical record at the general practitioner's office or in the hospital record of women who became pregnant or started an infertility workup. All analyses were done using SPSS.

      Results

      In Group A, 93.6% (102/109) of the women became pregnant. Time to conception was unaffected by parity order, duration of use and age at time for removal of the IUD. Among the seven women who did not conceive, four women cancelled pregnancy plans, while three women started an infertility workup. The distribution of intra-/extrauterine pregnancies did not differ between Groups A and B. However, significantly more pregnancies were terminated as induced abortions in Group B. The two women (2%) who did not conceive in Group B did not start an infertility workup.

      Conclusion

      In line with results from other studies, there is no evidence that prior use of a copper-containing IUD increases the risk for impaired fertility regardless of the reason for removal.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mueller B.A.
        • Luz-Jimenez M.
        • Daling J.R.
        • Moore D.E.
        • McKnight B.
        • Weiss N.S.
        Risk factors for tubal infertility.
        Sex Transm Dis. 1992; 19: 28-34
        • Burkman R.T.
        Association between intrauterine device and PID.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1981; 57: 269-276
        • Lee N.C.
        • Rubin G.L.
        • Ory H.W.
        • Burkman R.T.
        Type of IUD and the risk of PID.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1983; 62: 1-6
        • Lee N.C.
        • Rubin G.L.
        • Borucki R.
        The IUD and PID revisited: new results from the Women's Health Study.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 72: 1-6
        • Kronmal R.A.
        • Whitney C.W.
        • Mumford S.D.
        The intrauterine device and pelvic inflammatory disease: the Women's Health Study reanalyzed.
        J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44: 109-122
        • Daling J.R.
        • Weiss N.S.
        • Metch B.J.
        • et al.
        Primary tubal infertility in relation to the use of an intrauterine device.
        N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 937-941
        • Cramer D.W.
        • Schiff I.
        • Schoenbaum S.C.
        • et al.
        Tubal infertility and the intrauterine device.
        N Engl J Med. 1985; 312: 941-947
        • Py��r��l�� T.
        • Allonen H.
        • Nygren K.G.
        • Nielsen N.C.
        • Luukkainen T.
        Return of fertility after the removal of Nova-T or Copper-T-200.
        Contraception. 1982; 26: 113-120
        • Vessey M.P.
        • Lawless M.
        • McPhersson K.
        • Yeates D.
        Fertility after stopping use of intrauterine contraceptive device.
        BMJ. 1983; 286: 106
        • Randic L.
        • Vlasic S.
        • Matrljan I.
        • Waszak C.S.
        Return to fertility after IUD removal for planned pregnancy.
        Contraception. 1985; 32: 253-259
        • Sandmire H.F.
        Fertility after intrauterine device discontinuation.
        Adv Contracept. 1986; 2: 327-335
        • Skjeldestad F.E.
        • Bratt H.
        Fertility after complicated and non-complicated use of IUDs. A controlled prospective study.
        Adv Contracept. 1988; 4: 179-184
        • Wilson J.C.
        A prospective New Zealand study of fertility after removal of copper intrauterine contraceptive devices for conception and because of complications: a four-year study.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1989; 160: 391-396
        • Van Kets H.E.
        • Thiery M.
        • Van der Pas H.
        • Dieben T.O.M.
        Long-term experience with multiload IUD.
        Adv Contracept. 1989; 5: 179-188
        • Belhadj H.
        • Sivin I.
        • Diaz S.
        • et al.
        Recovery of fertility after use of the levonogestrel 20 mcg/d or copper T 380 Ag intrauterine device.
        Contraception. 1986; 34: 261-267
        • Haugan T.
        • Skjeldestad F.E.
        • Halvorsen L.E.
        • Kahn H.
        A randomized trial on clinical performance with Nova T��380 and Gyne T��380 Slimline copper IUDs.
        Contraception. 2006; ([accepted for February 2007])
        • Skjeldestad F.E.
        • Borgan J.K.
        • Daltveit A.K.
        • Nymoen E.H.
        Demografiske faktorar og svangerskap ��� kven veljer abort?.
        Tidsskr Nor L��geforen. 1993; 113: 56-60
        • ��stby L.
        Prevensjonsbruken i Norge.
        Tidsskr Nor L��geforen. 1983; 103: 1793-1797
        • Skjeldestad F.E.
        Choice of contraceptive modality by women in Norway.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1993; 72: 48-52
        • Hubacher D.
        • Lara-Ricalde R.
        • Taylor D.J.
        • Guerra-Infante F.
        • Guzm��n-Rodriguez R.
        Use of copper intrauterine devices and the risk of tubal infertility among nulligravid women.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 561-567
        • Daling J.R.
        • Weiss N.S.
        • Voigt L.F.
        • McKnight B.
        • Moore D.E.
        The intrauterine device and primary tubal infertility.
        N Engl J Med. 1992; 326: 203-204
        • Grimes D.A.
        Intrauterine device and upper genital tract infection.
        Lancet. 2000; 356: 1013-1019