Original research article| Volume 75, ISSUE 3, P209-213, March 2007

Download started.


Knowledge of and perceived access to emergency contraception at two urgent care clinics in California



      California allowed women access to emergency contraception (EC) without a physicians' prescription in 2002.


      To assess knowledge of and perceived access to EC among California women outside of family planning settings, we administered a computerized survey to women, age 18���45 years, who could become pregnant, in the waiting areas of two urgent care clinics in San Francisco in 2005.


      Four hundred forty-six women were enrolled. Most women [87%; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 83���89%] in this well-educated (48% had college degrees), ethnically diverse sample knew that a postcoital contraceptive exists. However, many women (32%; 95% CI, 28���37%) did not know EC is currently available in California. Only 49% of women knew that using EC will have no adverse effect on their future fertility and only 15% knew that EC will not cause a miscarriage or birth defects if used by a woman who is pregnant. Seven percent thought EC was not at all effective and 27% thought EC was somewhat or very unsafe. Eight percent had EC at home for future use.


      Functional knowledge of EC remains limited in California. Public education campaigns are needed to allow women to benefit from pharmacy direct access to EC.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kaiser Family Foundation
        SELF Magazine. National survey of women about their sexual health.
        ([accessed September 21, 2005])
        • Salganicoff A.
        • Wentworth B.
        • Ranji U.
        Emergency contraception in California: findings from a 2003 Kaiser Family Foundation survey.
        The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation, Menlo Park (CA)2004
        • Finer L.B.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Abortion incidence and services in the United States in 2000.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2003; 35: 6-15
        • Blanchard J.C.
        • Haywood Y.C.
        • Scott C.
        Racial and ethnic disparities in health: an emergency medicine perspective.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2003; 10: 1289-1293
      1. Schwarz EB, Gerbert B, Gonzales R. Need for emergency contraception in urgent care settings. Contraception [in press].

        • Raine T.R.
        • Harper C.C.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • et al.
        Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 54-62
        • Jones R.K.
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Contraceptive use among U.S. women having abortions in 2000���2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2002; 34: 294-303
        • Jackson R.A.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Freedman L.
        • Darney P.
        Advance supply of emergency contraception: effect on use and usual contraception���a randomized trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 8-16
        • Gold M.A.
        • Wolford J.E.
        • Smith K.A.
        • Parker A.M.
        The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women's sexual and contraceptive behaviors.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004; 17: 87-96
        • Lo S.S.
        • Fan S.Y.
        • Ho P.C.
        • Glasier A.F.
        Effect of advanced provision of emergency contraception on women's contraceptive behaviour: a randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2004; 19: 2404-2410