Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 85, ISSUE 5, P458-464, May 2012

Pilot study of home self-administration of subcutaneous depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate for contraception

  • Sharon T. Cameron
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +44 131 536 1070; fax: +44 131 536 1609.
    Affiliations
    Chalmers Sexual and Reproductive Health Service, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, EH3 9ES Scotland UK

    Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, EH16 5SU
    Search for articles by this author
  • Anna Glasier
    Affiliations
    Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, EH16 5SU
    Search for articles by this author
  • Anne Johnstone
    Affiliations
    Department of Reproductive and Developmental Sciences, University of Edinburgh, 51 Little France Crescent, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, EH16 5SU
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Background

      Subcutaneous depo-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) offers the possibility of self-administration.

      Study Design

      This is a pilot study of self-administration of DMPA-SC. Existing users of the intramuscular preparation (DMPA-IM) who wished to self-inject (n=64) were taught self-administration using DMPA-SC. The main outcome was the continuation rate of the method at 12 months compared to a control group of existing users of DMPA-IM (n=64) who continued to attend a clinic to receive the method. Women's satisfaction with the method and the proportion of self-injections given at correct time were also determined.

      Results

      The 12-month discontinuation rate of the DMPA-SC group (12%) did not differ significantly from that of the DMPA-IM group (22%) (95% confidence intervals of 13%���33% and 6%���23% for DMPA-SC and DMPA-IM, respectively; p=.23). All self-injections were given within the appropriate interval. There was no significant difference in the proportion of women in either group who were satisfied with the method.

      Conclusion

      Self-administration of DMPA-SC for contraception is feasible and is associated with similar continuation rates and satisfaction to clinician-administered DMPA-IM.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • National Institute for Clinical Health and Excellence
        Long-acting reversible methods of contraception. 2005 ([access date 10th June 2011])
        • Lader D.
        Opinions survey report no. 41. Contraception and sexual health. A report on research using the ONS Omnibus Survey produced by the Office for National Statistics on behalf of the Department of Health. Office for National Statistics, London2009 ([access date 7th July 2011])
        • Trussell J.
        Contraceptive efficacy.
        in: Hatcher R.A. Trussel J. Stewart F. Nelson A. Cates W. Guest F. Kowal D. Contraceptive technology. 18th revised ed. Ardent Media, New York2004: 747-755
        • Halpern V.
        • Lopez L.M.
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Gallo M.F.
        Strategies to improve adherence and acceptability of hormonal methods of contraception.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011; 4 ([Review]): CD004317
        • Jain J.
        • Dutton C.
        • Nicosia A.
        • Wajszczuk C.
        • Bode F.R.
        • Mishell D.R.
        Pharmacokinetics, ovulation suppression and return to ovulation following a lower dose subcutaneous formulation of Depo-Provera��.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 11-18
        • Jain J.
        • Jakimiuk A.J.
        • Bode F.R.
        • Ross D.
        • Kaunitz A.M.
        Contraceptive efficacy and safety of DMPA-SC.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 269-275
        • Lakha F.
        • Henderson C.
        • Glasier A.
        • Lakha F.
        • Henderson C.
        • Glasier A.
        The acceptability of self-administration of subcutaneous Depo-Provera.
        Contraception. 2005; 72: 14-18
        • Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare
        Clinical Effectiveness Unit Guidance. Progestogen only injectable contraception.
        ([access date 28th April 2011])
        • Mcloone P.
        Carstairs scores for Scottish postcode sectors from the 2001 Census Report; 2004.
        ([access date 10 th June 2011])
        • World Health Organization
        Selected practice recommendations for contraceptive use. 2nd ed. WHO, Department of Reproductive Health and Research, 2004 ([access date 7th july 2011])
        • Bahamondes L.
        • Marchi N.M.
        • Nakagava H.M.
        • et al.
        Self- administration with Uniject of the once-a-month injectable contraceptive Cyclofem.
        Contraception. 1997; 56: 301-304
        • Stanwood N.L.
        • Eastwood K.
        • Carletta A.
        Self-injection of monthly combined hormonal contraceptive.
        Contraception. 2006; 73: 53-55
        • Keder L.M.
        • Rulin M.C.
        • Gruss J.
        Compliance with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a randomized controlled trial of intensive reminders.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995; 169: 583-585
        • Picardo C.
        • Ferreri S.
        Pharmacist-administered subcutaneous depot medroxyprogesterone acetate: a pilot randomized controlled trial.
        Contraception. 2010; 82: 160-167
        • Kaunitz A.M.
        • Darney P.D.
        • Ross D.
        • Wolter K.D.
        • Speroff L.
        Subcutaneous DMPA vs. intramuscular DMPA: a 2-year randomized study of contraceptive efficacy and bone mineral density.
        Contraception. 2009; 80: 7-17
        • Arias R.D.
        • Jain J.K.
        • Brucker C.
        • Ross D.
        • Ray A.
        Changes in bleeding patterns with depot medroxyprogesterone acetate subcutaneous injection 104 mg.
        Contraception. 2006; 74: 234-238
        • Bohannon N.J.
        • Ohannesian J.P.
        • Burdan A.L.
        • Holcombe J.H.
        • Zagar A.
        Patient and physician satisfaction with the Humulin/Humalog Pen, a new 3.0-mL prefilled pen device for insulin delivery.
        Clin Ther. 2000; 22: 1049-1067
        • Kamal A.D.
        • Dixon A.N.
        • Bain S.C.
        Safety and side effects of the insulin analogues.
        Expert Opinion on Drug Safety. 2006; 5: 131-143
        • Touraine P.
        • D'Souza G.A.
        • Kourides I.
        • et al.
        The GH Lipoatrophy Study Group. Lipoatrophy in GH deficient patients treated with a long-acting pegylated GH.
        Eur J Endocrinol. 2009; 161: 533-540
        • Dorai V.
        • Hazard M.C.
        • Paris J.
        • Delansorne R.
        Lipolytic activity of progesterone and synthetic progestins on rat parametrial adipocytes in vitro.
        J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1991; 258: 620-625
        • Faculty of Sexual and Reproductive Healthcare, Clinical effectiveness unit
        First prescription of combined oral contraception. 2006 ([access date 7th July 2011])
        • Malarcher S.
        • Meirik O.
        • Lebetkin E.
        • Shah I.
        • Spieler J.
        • Stanback J.
        Provision of DMPA by community health workers: what the evidence shows.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 495-503