Advertisement

Trends in contraceptive use

      Abstract

      Background

      In the past 50–60 years, desired and actual family size have decreased and contraceptive use has increased, especially in developing countries. Unmet need for modern contraceptives and unintended pregnancy levels remain significant.

      Study Design

      Data compiled by the United Nations and information from national surveys of women of reproductive age are used to examine trends.

      Results

      Oral contraceptives and condoms have been predominant methods in developed countries; sterilization has been the most common in Latin America and the Caribbean and Asia; hormonal methods, in Africa. Some 222 million women in developing countries have unmet need for modern contraceptives, resulting in 2012 in an estimated 54 million unintended pregnancies and 79,000 maternal deaths more than if they used modern methods.

      Conclusions

      Improvements are needed in contraceptive information and services as well as in contraceptive methods themselves to increase couples' success in achieving their desired timing and number of children.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Total fertility by major area, region and country 1950–2100 (children per woman), World Population Prospects: The 2010 Revision, CD-ROM Edition, 2011.

        • Lightbourne R.E.
        • MacDonald A.L.
        Family size preferences. Comparative Studies Number 14. International Statistical Institute, Voorburg, Netherlands1982
        • Kent M.M.
        • Larson A.
        Fertility size preferences: evidence from the World Fertility Surveys. Reports on the World Fertility Survey. Population Reference Bureau, Washington, DC1982
        • Westoff C.F.
        Reproductive preferences: a comparative view.
        in: Demographic and Health Surveys Comparative Studies No. 3. 1991: 1-23
      2. Tabulations from Statcompiler: Macro International Inc, 2012. MEASURE DHS STATcompiler. http://www.measuredhs.com, July 27 2012.

      3. Adapted from Shah I, levels and trends in contraceptive use http://www.gfmer.ch/Endo/Course2003/PDF/Contraceptive_use.pdf, accessed May 22, 2007.

        • Population Division, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
        World Contraceptive Use 2005. United Nations, New York2005
        • Population Division, United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs
        World Contraceptive Use 2011. United Nations, New York2011
        • Mauldin W.P.
        • Segal S.J.
        Prevalence of contraceptive use: trends and issues.
        Stud Fam Plann. 1988; 19: 335-353
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Singh S.
        Adding it up: the costs and benefits of investing in family planning and maternal and newborn health — estimation methodology. Guttmacher Institute, New York2011
        • Singh S.
        • Darroch J.E.
        Adding it up: costs and benefits of contraceptive services — estimates for 2012. Guttmacher Institute and United Nations Population Fund (UNFPA), New York2012
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Sedgh G.
        • Ball H.
        Contraceptive technologies: responding to women's needs. Guttmacher Institute, New York2011
      4. London Summit on Family Planning. http://www.londonfamilyplanningsummit.co.uk/. Accessed July 22, 2012.

      5. Third Bellagio Conference on Population May 10–12, 1973 Working Papers. New York: Rockefeller Foundation. 1973.

        • Greep R.O.
        • Koblinsky M.A.
        • Jaffe F.S.
        Reproduction and human welfare: A challenge to research.
        Bioscience. 1976; 26: 677-684
      6. Atkinson L, Schearer SB, Harkavy O, Lincoln R. Prospects for improved contraception. Fam Plann Perspect 1980; 12:173–5, 178–92.

        • Office of Technology Assessment
        World Population and Fertility Planning Technologies: The Next 20 Years. Office of Technology Assessment, Washington, DC1982
        • Atkinson L.E.
        • Lincoln R.
        • Forrest J.D.
        The next contraceptive revolution.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1986; 18: 19-26
      7. Djerassi C, The bitter pill, Science, 1989, New Series, 245(4916): 356–361.

      8. Mastroianni L. Donaldson P.J. Kane T.T. Developing new contraceptives: obstacles and opportunities. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.1990
      9. Harrison P.F. Rosenfield A. Contraceptive research and development: looking to the future. National Academy Press, Washington, DC1996
        • Nass S.L.
        • Strauss J.F.
        New frontiers in contraceptive research: a blueprint for action. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC2004
      10. Duncan GW, External Review of USAID's Current and Future Role in Contraceptive Research and Development, October 5, 2006 (revised version issued February 14, 2007).