Advertisement
Review article| Volume 87, ISSUE 6, P728-731, June 2013

Download started.

Ok

Controversies in family planning: management of second-trimester losses in the setting of an abdominal cerclage

      Abstract

      For women who have a fetal demise with an abdominal cerclage in place, route of uterine evacuation is a clinical dilemma. We review a case of a second trimester loss in the setting of an abdominal cerclage in an HIV positive woman. We provide other clinician's experience and management strategies and provide a review of cases found in the literature.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Davis G.
        • Berghella V.
        • Talucci M.
        • Wapner R.J.
        Patients with a prior failed transvaginal cerclage: a comparison of obstetric outcomes with either transabdominal or transvaginal cerclage.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000; 183: 836-839
        • Zaveri V.
        • Aghajafari F.
        • Amankwah K.
        • Hannah M.
        Abdominal versus vaginal cerclage after a failed transvaginal cerclage: a systematic review.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 868-872
        • Lotgering F.K.
        • Gaugler-Senden I.P.M.
        • Lotgering S.R.
        • Wallenburg H.C.
        Outcome after transabdominal cervicoisthmic cerclage.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 779-784
        • Mingione M.J.
        • Scibetta J.J.
        • Sanko S.R.
        • Phipps W.R.
        Clinical outcomes following interval laparoscopic transabdominal cervico-isthmic cerclage placement: case series.
        Hum Reprod. 2003; 18: 1716-1719
        • Thuesen L.L.
        • Diness B.R.
        • Langhoff-Roos J.
        Pre-pregnancy transabdominal cerclage.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2009; 88: 483-486
        • Agdi M.
        • Tulandi T.
        Placement and removal of abdominal cerclage by laparoscopy.
        Reprod Biomed Online. 2008; 16: 308-310
        • Carter J.F.
        • Soper D.E.
        Laparoscopic removal of abdominal cerclage.
        JSLS. 2007; 11: 375-377
        • Herron M.A.
        • Parer J.T.
        Transabdominal cerclage for fetal wastage due to cervical incompetence.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1988; 71: 865-868
        • Umstad M.P.
        • Quinn M.A.
        • Ades A.
        Transabdominal cervical cerclage.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2010; 50: 460-464
        • Foster T.L.
        • Moore E.S.
        • Sumners J.E.
        Operative complications and fetal morbidity encountered in 300 prophylactic transabdominal cervical cerclage procedures by one obstetric surgeon.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 31: 713-717
        • Smout E.M.
        • Shennan A.H.
        Uterine rupture following abdominal cerclage with prior classical caesarean section.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011; 31: 83-84
        • The Practice Committee of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine
        Guidelines for reducing the risk of viral transmission during fertility treatment.
        Fertil Steril. 2008; 90: S156-S162
        • Kushnir V.A.
        • Lewis W.
        Human immunodeficiency virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and infertility: emerging problems in the era of highly active antiretrovirals.
        Fertil Steril. 2011; 96: 546-553
        • Sauer M.V.
        American physicians remain slow to embrace the reproductive needs of human immunodeficiency virus���infected patients.
        Fertil Steril. 2006; 85: 295-297