Advertisement

Advance supply of emergency contraception: a systematic review

      Abstract

      Background

      Emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) are an underutilized means to reduce unintended pregnancy. Advance provision of ECPs may increase timely use, thereby decreasing risk of unintended pregnancy.

      Study Design

      We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE through February 2012 for randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) pertaining to safety and efficacy of advance provision of ECP. The quality of each individual study was evaluated using the United States Preventive Services Task Force evidence grading system.

      Results

      The search strategy identified 714 articles. Seventeen papers reported on safety or efficacy of advance ECPs in adult or adolescent women. Any use of ECPs was two to seven times greater among women who received an advanced supply of ECP. However, a summary estimate (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69���1.18) of four RCTs did not demonstrate a significant reduction in unintended pregnancy over 12 months when advance provision was compared with standard provision of ECPs. Patterns of contraceptive use, pregnancy rates and incidence of sexually transmitted infections did not vary between treatment and control groups in the majority of studies among either adults or adolescents.

      Conclusion

      Available evidence supports the safety of advance provision of ECPs. Efficacy of advance provision compared with standard provision of ECPs in reducing unintended pregnancy rates at the population level has not been demonstrated.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Schreiber C.A.
        • Ratcliffe S.J.
        • Barnhart K.T.
        A randomized controlled trial of the effect of advanced supply of emergency contraception in postpartum teens: a feasibility study.
        Contraception. 2010; 81: 435-440
        • Berer M.
        • Coutinho E.
        • Delano G.
        • Ellertson C.
        • Garzaflores J.
        • Glasier A.
        • et al.
        Consensus statement on emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 1995; 52: 211-213
        • Finer L.B.
        • Zolna M.R.
        Unintended pregnancy in the United States: incidence and disparities, 2006.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: 478-485
        • Trussell J.
        • et al.
        Preventing unintended pregnancy: the cost-effectiveness of three methods of emergency contraception.
        Am J Public Health. 1997; 87: 932-937
        • World Health Organization
        Task Force on Postovulatory Methods of Fertility Regulation. Randomized controlled trial of levonorgestrel versus the Yuzpe regimen of combined oral contraceptives for emergency contraception.
        Lancet. 1998; 352: 428-433
        • Yuzpe A.A.
        • Lancee W.J.
        Ethinylestradiol and dl-nogestrel as a potcoital contraceptive.
        Fertil Steril. 1977; 28: 932-936
        • World Health Organization
        Medical Eligibility Criteria for Contraceptive Use. 4th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva2010
        • Glasier A.
        Emergency contraception.
        Br Med Bull. 2000; 56: 729-738
        • Cheng L.
        • Gulmenzoglu A.M.
        • Piaggio G.
        • Ezcurra E.
        • Van Look P.F.
        Interventions for emergency contraception.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16; (Review): CD001324
        • Piaggio G.
        • Kapp N.
        • von H.H.
        Effect on pregnancy rates of the delay in the administration of levonorgestrel for emergency contraception: a combined analysis of four WHO trials.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: 35-39
        • Ellertson C.
        • et al.
        Emergency contraception: randomized comparison of advance provision and information only.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2001; 98: 570-575
        • Ellertson C.
        • et al.
        Should emergency contraceptive pills be available without prescription?.
        J Am Med Womens Assoc. 1998; 53: 226-229
        • Trussell J.
        • et al.
        Emergency contraceptive pills: a simple proposal to reduce unintended pregnancies.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1992; 24: 269-273
        • Ziebland S.
        • Wyke S.
        • Seaman P.
        • Fairhurst K.
        • Walker J.
        • Glasier A.
        What happened when Scottish women were given advance supplies of emergency contraception? A survey and qualitative study of women's views and experiences.
        Soc Sci Med. 2004; 60: 1767-1779
        • Shelton J.D.
        Repeat contraception: facing our fears.
        Contraception. 2002; 66: 15-17
        • Harris R.P.
        • Helfand M.
        • Woolf S.H.
        • Lohr K.N.
        • Mulrow C.D.
        • Teutsch S.M.
        • et al.
        Current methods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process.
        Am J Prev Med. 2001; 20: 21-35
        • Mohllajee A.P.
        • Curtis K.M.
        • Flanagan R.G.
        • Rinehart W.
        • Gaffield M.L.
        • Peterson H.B.
        Keeping up with evidence a new system for WHO's evidence-based family planning guidance.
        Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28: 483-490
        • Baecher L.
        • Weaver M.A.
        • Raymond E.G.
        Increased access to emergency contraception: why it may fail.
        Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 815-819
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Stewart F.
        • Weaver M.
        • Monteith C.
        • Van Der Pol B.
        Impact of increased access to emergency contraceptive pills: a randomized, controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 108: 1098-1106
        • Baecher L.
        • Weaver M.A.
        • Raymond E.G.
        Increased access to emergency contraception: why it may fail.
        Hum Reproduc. 2009; 24: 815-819
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Gerbert B.
        • Gonzales R.
        Computer-assisted provision of emergency contraception a randomized controlled trial.
        J Gen Inter Med. 2008; 2: 794-799
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Weaver M.A.
        Effect of an emergency contraceptive pill intervention on pregnancy risk behavior.
        Contraception. 2008; 77: 333-336
        • Walsh T.L.
        • Frezieres R.G.
        Patterns of emergency contraception use by age and ethnicity from a randomized trial comparing advance provision and information only.
        Contraception. 2006; 74: 110-117
        • Harper C.C.
        • Cheong M.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • Darney P.D.
        • Raine T.R.
        The effect of increased access to emergency contraception among young adolescents.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 106: 483-491
        • Baerwald A.R.
        • Olatunbosun O.A.
        • Pierson R.A.
        Ovarian follicular development is initiated during the hormone-free interval of oral contraceptive use.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 371-377
        • Jackson R.A.
        • et al.
        Advance supply of emergency contraception: effect on use and usual contraception ��� a randomized trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2003; 102: 8-16
        • Hazari K.
        Use of emergency contraception by women as a back-up method.
        Health Popul Perspec Iss. 2000; 23: 115-122
        • Glasier A.
        • Baird D.T.
        The effects of self-administering emergency contraception.
        New Eng J Med. 1998; 339: 1-4
        • Ekstrand M.
        • Larsson M.
        • Darj E.
        • Tyden T.
        Advance provision of emergency contraceptive pills reduces treatment delay: a randomised controlled trial among Swedish teenage girls.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008; 87: 354-359
        • Belzer M.
        • et al.
        Advance supply of emergency contraception: a randomized trial in adolescent mothers.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2005; 18: 347-354
        • Gold M.A.
        The effects of advance provision of emergency contraception on adolescent women's sexual and contraceptive behaviors.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2004; 17: 87-96
        • Lo S.S.T.
        • Fan S.Y.S.
        • Ho P.C.
        • Glasier A.F.
        Effect of advanced provision of emergency contraception on women's contraceptive behavior: a randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reproduc. 2004; 19: 2404-2410
        • Weaver M.A.
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Baecher L.
        Attitude and behavior rffects in a randomized trial of increased access to emergency contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 107-116
        • Raine T.R.
        • Harper C.C.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • Padian N.
        • Klausner J.D.
        • Darney P.D.
        Direct access to emergency contraception through pharmacies and effect on unintended pregnancy and STIs.
        JAMA. 2005; 293: 62
        • Trussell J.
        • Raymond E.
        • Stewart F.
        Letter to the Editor.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2006; 19: 251
        • Polis C.B.
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Schaffer K.
        • Blanchard K.
        • Glasier A.
        • Harper C.
        Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention (2010 update).
        Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2007; : CD005497https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD005497.pub2
        • Hu X.Y.
        • Cheng L.N.
        • Hua X.L.
        • Glasier A.
        Advanced provision of emergency contraception to postnatal women in China makes no difference in abortion rates: a randomized controlled trial.
        Contraception. 2005; 72: 111-116