Advertisement

Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs)

      Abstract

      Objective(s)

      This study examines the on-site availability of long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) methods, defined here as intrauterine devices and contraceptive implants, at Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs). We also describe factors associated with on-site availability and specific challenges and barriers to providing on-site access to LARC as reported by FQHCs.

      Study design

      An original survey of 423 FQHC organizations was fielded in 2011.

      Results

      Over two thirds of FQHCs offer on-site availability of intrauterine devices yet only 36% of FQHCs report that they offer on-site contraceptive implants. Larger FQHCs and FQHCs receiving Title X Family Planning program funding are more likely to provide on-site access to LARC methods. Other organizational and patient characteristics are associated with the on-site availability of LARC methods, though this relationship varies by the type of method. The most commonly reported barriers to providing on-site access to LARC methods are related to the cost of stocking or supplying the drug and/or device, the perceived lack of staffing and training, and the unique needs of special populations.

      Conclusion

      Our findings indicate that patients seeking care in small FQHC organizations, FQHCs with limited dedicated family planning funding and FQHCs located in rural areas may have fewer choices and limited access to LARC methods on-site.

      Implications

      Despite the presumed widespread coverage of contraceptives for women as a result of provisions in the Affordable Care Act, there is a limited understanding of how FQHCs may redesign their practices to provide on-site availability of LARC methods. This study sheds light on the current state of practice and challenges related to providing LARC methods in FQHC settings.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Increasing use of contraceptive implants and intrauterine devices to reduce unintended pregnancy.
        ([Internet]) Committee on Gynecologic Practice, ACOG, Washington, DC2009 ([cited 2013 April 18]. Available from:)
        • Finer L.B.
        • Jerman J.
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009, fertility and sterility.
        (Available from:)
        • Winner B.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Zhao Q.
        • Buckel C.
        • Madden T.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • et al.
        Long-acting reversible contraception: a practical solution to reduce unintended pregnancy.
        N Engl J Med. 2012 May; 366: 1998-2007
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        Contraceptive methods available to patients of office-based physicians and Title X clinics — United States, 2009–2010.
        MMWR Weekly. 2011; 60: 1-4
        • Speidel J.J.
        • Harper C.C.
        • Shields W.C.
        The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy.
        Contraception. 2008 Sep; 78: 197-200
        • Eisenberg D.
        • McNicholas C.
        • Peipert J.F.
        Cost as a barrier to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use in adolescents.
        J Adolescent Health. 2013; 52: s59-s63
        • Rose S.B.
        • Cooper A.J.
        • Baker N.K.
        • Lawton B.
        Attitudes toward long-acting reversible contraception among young women seeking abortion.
        J Womens Health. 2011 Nov; 20: 1729-1735
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Madden T.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Secura G.M.
        Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 1291-1297
        • Harper C.C.
        • Henderson J.T.
        • Raine T.R.
        • Goodman S.
        • Darney P.D.
        • Thompson K.M.
        • et al.
        Evidence-based IUD practice: family physicians and obstetrician–gynecologists.
        Fam Med. 2012; 44: 637-645
        • Morse J.
        • Freedman L.
        • Speidel J.J.
        • Thompson K.M.
        • Stratton L.
        • Harper C.C.
        Postabortion contraception: qualitative interviews on counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
        Perspect Sex Repro H. 2012; 44: 100-106
        • Vaaler M.L.
        • Kalanges L.K.
        • Fonseca V.P.
        • Castrucci B.C.
        Urban–rural differences in attitudes and practices toward long-acting reversible contraceptives among family planning providers in Texas.
        Women's Health Iss. 2012; 22: e157-e162
        • Blumoff Greenberg K.
        • Makino K.K.
        • Coles M.S.
        Factors associated with provision of long-acting reversible contraception among adolescent health care providers.
        J Adolescent Health. 2013; 52: 372-374
        • Thompson K.M.
        • Speidel J.J.
        • Saporta V.
        • Waxman N.J.
        • Harper C.C.
        Contraceptive policies affect post-abortion provision of long-acting reversible contraception.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 41-47
        • Health Resources and Services Administration [HRSA]
        The Affordable Care Act and health centers. Fact sheet.
        (Available at:)
      2. 2011 National UDS data.
        ([Internet]) Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, MD2012 ([cited 2013 April 18]. Available from:)
      3. Grants for Community Health Services, Primary Health Services, 42 C.F.R. §51c.102(b) Grants for community health services. Primary health services (2002).

        • Wood S.
        • Beeson T.
        • Bruen B.
        • Goetz Goldberg D.
        • Mead H.
        • Shin P.
        • Rosenbaum S.
        Scope of family planning services available in Federally Qualified Health Centers.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 85-90
        • Rosenbaum S.
        • Shin P.
        • Paradise J.
        FQHCs: the challenge of growing to meet the need for primary health care in medically underserved communities. Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured.
        ([Internet]) Kaiser Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured, Washington, DC2012 ([cited 2013 April 18]. Available from:)
        • Office of Population Affairs, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
        [Internet]. Title X family planning. Available at.
        • Frost J.
        • Gold R.
        • Frohwirth L.
        • Blades N.
        Variation in service delivery practices among clinics providing publicly funded family planning services in 2010.
        Guttmacher Institute, Washington (DC)2012 (Available from:)
        • Census regions and divisions [Internet]
        Bureau of Labor Statistics, Washington, DC2001 (Available from:)
        • Wood S.
        • Goldberg D.G.
        • Beeson T.
        • Bruen B.
        • Johnson K.
        • Mead H.
        • et al.
        Health centers and family planning: results from a nationwide study.
        ([Internet]) The George Washington University School of Public Health and Health Services, Department of Health Policy, Washington, DC2013 ([cited 2013 April 18]. Available from:)
        • StataCorp
        Stata statistical software: release 11.
        StataCorp LP, College Station, TX2009
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Rodriguez M.I.
        • Levy K.
        • Borrero S.
        • Steinauer J.
        Disparities in family planning.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar; 8: 214-221
        • Ranjit N.
        • Bankole A.
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Singh S.
        Contraceptive failure in the first two years of use: differences across socioeconomic subgroups.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 2001; 33: 19-27
        • Trussell J.
        • Vaughan B.
        Contraceptive failure, method related discontinuation and resumption of use: results from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 31: 64-72
        • Fu H.
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Haas T.
        • Ranjit N.
        Contraceptive failure rates: new estimates from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 1: 56-63
        • Vaughan B.
        • Trussell J.
        • Kost K.
        • Singh S.
        • Jones R.
        Discontinuation and resumption of contraceptive use: results from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 271-283
      4. Health Insurance Reform Requirements for the Group and Individual Health Insurance Markets, Exemption and Accommodations in Connection with Coverage of Preventive Health Services, 45 C.F.R. Part 147.131 (2010).

      5. Women’s preventive services: required health plan coverage guidelines [Internet]. Rockville, MD: Health Resources and Services Administration; [date unknown] [cited 2013 April 18]. Available from: http://www.hrsa.gov/womensguidelines/.