Advertisement
Commentary| Volume 89, ISSUE 2, P73-74, February 2014

The public health threat of anti-abortion legislation

  • Daniel Grossman
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA 94612, USA. Tel.: +1 510 986 8941; fax: +1 510 986 8960.
    Affiliations
    Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Austin, TX 78712, USA

    Ibis Reproductive Health, Oakland, CA 94612, USA

    Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94110, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kari White
    Affiliations
    Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Austin, TX 78712, USA

    Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Kristine Hopkins
    Affiliations
    Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Austin, TX 78712, USA

    Population Research Center and the Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Joseph E. Potter
    Affiliations
    Texas Policy Evaluation Project, Austin, TX 78712, USA

    Population Research Center and the Department of Sociology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX 78712, USA
    Search for articles by this author
      What happens when abortion access is severely restricted for 26 million Americans? Texas is about to find out. In July 2013, the Texas legislature passed one of the country’s most restrictive laws that not only bans most abortions after 22 weeks and limits the use of medical abortion but also contains several provisions that are likely to lead to the closure of most abortion clinics in the state. The law requires facilities to meet the standards of ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs) and mandates physicians to have admitting privileges at nearby hospitals. Proponents of the law claim it will improve safety, despite overwhelming evidence that abortions provided in outpatient clinics have a very low level of complications [
      • Weitz T.A.
      • Taylor D.
      • Desai S.
      • et al.
      Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver.
      ]. This legislation comes on the heels of measures passed in 2011 that drastically reduced funding for family planning, effectively removed Planned Parenthood from all state-funded family planning programs and required women seeking abortion to make an extra visit at least 24 hours before the abortion in order to undergo an ultrasound and listen to a detailed description of its images.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Weitz T.A.
        • Taylor D.
        • Desai S.
        • et al.
        Safety of aspiration abortion performed by nurse practitioners, certified nurse midwives, and physician assistants under a California legal waiver.
        Am J Public Health. 2013; 103: 454-461
        • Winikoff B.
        • Dzuba I.G.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • et al.
        Two distinct oral routes of misoprostol in mifepristone medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2008; 112: 1303-1310
        • Cleland K.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Nucatola D.
        • Nshom M.
        • Trussell J.
        Significant adverse events and outcomes after medical abortion.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 121: 166-171
        • Jones R.K.
        How commonly do US abortion patients report attempts to self-induce?.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 204: 23.e1-23.e4
        • World Health Organization
        Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems. 2nd ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2012: 4
        • Ashok P.W.
        • Templeton A.
        • Wagaarachchi P.T.
        • Flett G.M.
        Midtrimester medical termination of pregnancy: a review of 1002 consecutive cases.
        Contraception. 2004; 69: 51-58
        • Faúndes A.
        • Santos L.C.
        • Carvalho M.
        • et al.
        Post-abortion complications after interruption of pregnancy with misoprostol.
        Adv Contracept. 1996; 12: 1-9
        • Grossman D.
        • Holt K.
        • Peña M.
        • et al.
        Self-induction of abortion among women in the United States.
        Reprod Health Matters. 2010; 18: 136-146
        • Bartlett L.A.
        • Berg C.J.
        • Shulman H.B.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 729-737
      1. Grimes DA, Benson J, Singh S, et al. Unsafe abortion: the preventable pandemic. Lancet 2006; 25;368(9550):1908–19.

        • Sedgh G.
        • Singh S.
        • Shah I.H.
        • Ahman E.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        • Bankole A.
        Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 625-632