Original research article| Volume 89, ISSUE 2, P109-115, February 2014

Download started.


Medical termination of pregnancy during the second versus the first trimester and its effects on subsequent pregnancy



      The objective was to compare the risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, small for gestational age (SGA) infants and placental complications in subsequent pregnancy after second vs. first trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP) in primigravid women.

      Study Design

      A total of 88,522 women who underwent termination of pregnancy during 2000–2009 were identified using Finnish health registers. Of them, primigravid women who underwent MTOP and had subsequent pregnancy ending in live birth up to the end of 2009 (n=3843) were included in the study. The incidences and risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, SGA infants and placental complications after first- (n=3427) vs. second-trimester MTOP (n=416) were compared.


      Differences between the study groups in the incidences of preterm birth (3.9% in both groups), low birth weight (3.9% in the second- vs. 3.2% in the first-trimester group), SGA infants (2.4% vs. 2.5%) and placental complications (1.9% vs. 2.6%) were statistically insignificant. Second-trimester MTOP was associated with similar risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, SGA infants and placental complications compared with first-trimester MTOP after adjustment for background characteristics. After second-trimester MTOP, 51.2% of women underwent surgical evacuation, and 4.3% were diagnosed with infection. The differences in the risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, SGA infants and placental complications were statistically insignificant between women with vs. without these complications following second-trimester MTOP.


      Second-trimester MTOP among primigravid women did not increase the risks of preterm birth, low birth weight, SGA infants or placental complications in subsequent pregnancy compared with first-trimester MTOP.


      The present study suggests that medical termination of pregnancy in primigravid women during second vs. first trimester does not increase the risks of adverse outcomes in subsequent pregnancy and delivery. The data are of value when counseling women undergoing second-trimester TOP.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Sedgh G.
        • Singh S.
        • Shah I.H.
        • Ahman E.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        • Bankole A.
        Induced abortion: incidence and trends worldwide from 1995 to 2008.
        Lancet. 2012; 379: 625-632
        • Department of Health
        Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2011.
        (Available at:) (Accessed Jan. 16, 2013)
        • Socialstyrelsen
        (Available at:) (Accessed Jan. 16, 2013)
        • Guttmacher Institute
        Facts on induced abortion in the United States.
        (Available at:) (Accessed Jan. 16, 2013.)
        • National Institute for Health and Welfare
        Induced abortions 2011.
        (Available at:) (Accessed Jan. 16, 2013)
        • Gemzell-Danielsson K.
        • Lalitkumar S.
        Second trimester medical abortion with mifepristone–misoprostol and misoprostol alone: a review of methods and management.
        Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16: 162-172
        • Mannisto J.
        • Mentula M.
        • Bloigu A.
        • et al.
        Medical versus surgical termination of pregnancy in primigravid women-is the next delivery differently at risk? A population-based register study.
        BJOG. 2013; 120: 331-337
        • Virk J.
        • Zhang J.
        • Olsen J.
        Medical abortion and the risk of subsequent adverse pregnancy outcomes.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 357: 648-653
        • Chen A.
        • Yuan W.
        • Meirik O.
        • et al.
        Mifepristone-induced early abortion and outcome of subsequent wanted pregnancy.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2004; 160: 110-117
        • Zhu Q.X.
        • Gao E.S.
        • Chen A.M.
        • Luo L.
        • Cheng Y.M.
        • Yuan W.
        Mifepristone-induced abortion and placental complications in subsequent pregnancy.
        Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 315-319
        • Jackson J.E.
        • Grobman W.A.
        • Haney E.
        • Casele H.
        Mid-trimester dilation and evacuation with laminaria does not increase the risk for severe subsequent pregnancy complications.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2007; 96: 12-15
        • Kalish R.B.
        • Chasen S.T.
        • Rosenzweig L.B.
        • Rashbaum W.K.
        • Chervenak F.A.
        Impact of midtrimester dilation and evacuation on subsequent pregnancy outcome.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 187: 882-885
        • Schneider D.
        • Halperin R.
        • Langer R.
        • Caspi E.
        • Bukovsky I.
        Abortion at 18–22 weeks by laminaria dilation and evacuation.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 88: 412-414
        • Mentula M.J.
        • Niinimaki M.
        • Suhonen S.
        • Hemminki E.
        • Gissler M.
        • Heikinheimo O.
        Immediate adverse events after second trimester medical termination of pregnancy: results of a nationwide registry study.
        Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 927-932
        • Finlex
        Finnish legislation on induced abortion.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 20, 2013)
        • Finnish Medical Society Duodecim
        The Finnish current care guidelines. Feb. 6, 2013. Induced abortion.
        (Available at:) (Accessed May 28, 2013)
        • Pihkala J.
        • Hakala T.
        • Voutilainen P.
        • Raivio K.
        Uudet suomalaiset sikiön kasvukäyrät (Characteristics of recent fetal growth curves in Finland [in Finnish]).
        Duodecim. 1989; 105: 1540-1546
        • Statistics Finland
        Classification of education, Dec. 31, 1991. Handbook 1.
        Statistics Finland, Helsinki, Finland1992
        • Statistics Finland
        Classification of socioeconomic groups. Handbook 17.
        Helsinki, Finland, Statistics Finland1989
        • Statistics Finland
        Classification of occupations. Handbook 14.
        Helsinki, Finland, Statistics Finland1987
        • World Health Organization
        International classification of diseases (ICD).
        (Available at:) (Accessed Jan. 17, 2013)
        • Nordic Centre for Classifications in Health Care
        NCSP—the NOMESCO classification of surgical procedures.
        (Available at:) (Accessed Jan. 17, 2013)
        • Gissler M.
        • Teperi J.
        • Hemminki E.
        • Merilainen J.
        Data quality after restructuring a national medical registry.
        Scand J Soc Med. 1995; 23: 75-80
        • Gissler M.
        • Ulander V.M.
        • Hemminki E.
        • Rasimus A.
        Declining induced abortion rate in Finland: data quality of the Finnish abortion register.
        Int J Epidemiol. 1996; 25: 376-380
        • Heikinheimo O.
        • Gissler M.
        • Suhonen S.
        Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 149-154
        • Raatikainen K.
        • Heiskanen N.
        • Heinonen S.
        Induced abortion: not an independent risk factor for pregnancy outcome, but a challenge for health counseling.
        Ann Epidemiol. 2006; 16: 587-592
        • Zhou W.
        • Olsen J.
        Are complications after an induced abortion associated with reproductive failures in a subsequent pregnancy?.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2003; 82: 177-181
        • Heikinheimo O.
        • Gissler M.
        • Suhonen S.
        Can the outcome of the next pregnancy be predicted at the time of induced abortion?.
        Hum Reprod. 2009; 24: 820-826
        • Bhattacharya S.
        • Lowit A.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        • et al.
        Reproductive outcomes following induced abortion: a national register-based cohort study in Scotland.
        BMJ Open. 2012; 2: e000911
        • Shah P.S.
        • Zao J.
        Knowledge Synthesis Group of Determinants of Preterm/LBW births. Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses..
        BJOG. 2009; 116: 1425-1442
        • Thorp Jr., J.M.
        • Hartmann K.E.
        • Shadigian E.
        Long-term physical and psychological health consequences of induced abortion: review of the evidence.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2003; 58: 67-79
        • Atrash H.K.
        • Hogue C.J.
        The effect of pregnancy termination on future reproduction.
        Baillieres Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 1990; 4: 391-405
        • Frank P.I.
        • McNamee R.
        • Hannaford P.C.
        • Kay C.R.
        • Hirsch S.
        The effect of induced abortion on subsequent pregnancy outcome.
        BJOG. 1991; 98: 1015-1024
        • Mirmilstein V.
        • Rowlands S.
        • King J.F.
        Outcomes for subsequent pregnancy in women who have undergone misoprostol mid-trimester termination of pregnancy.
        Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009; 49: 195-197