Advertisement

Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach

      Few developments have received as much attention or palpable enthusiasm in the reproductive field in recent decades as long-acting reversible contraception (LARC). Though the term may be changing, here LARC refers to intrauterine contraception (IUC), implants and other in-development methods that prevent pregnancy for extended time periods without user action. Reproductive health journals and conferences increasingly — and even overwhelmingly — feature articles, panels and clinical trainings on LARC, and for good reason. Rates of unintended pregnancy have actually increased among the most socially disadvantaged women in recent years [
      • Finer L.B.
      • Henshaw S.K.
      Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
      ], suggesting an inadequacy of current prevention approaches.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer L.B.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        Disparities in rates of unintended pregnancy in the United States, 1994 and 2001.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2006; 38: 90-96
        • Trussell J.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404
        • Secura G.M.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Madden T.
        • Mullersman J.L.
        • Peipert J.F.
        The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 115.e1-115.e7
        • Speidel J.J.
        • Harper C.C.
        • Shields W.C.
        The potential of long-acting reversible contraception to decrease unintended pregnancy.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 197-200
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        • Jerman J.
        • Ethier K.
        • Moskosky S.
        Meeting the contraceptive needs of teens and young adults: youth-friendly and long-acting reversible contraceptive services in U.S. family planning facilities.
        J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52: 284-292
        • Madden T.
        Long-acting removable contraceptives prevent teen pregnancy.
        J Adolesc Health. 2013; 52: 255-256
        • Trussell J.
        • Henry N.
        • Hassan F.
        • Prezioso A.
        • Law A.
        • Filonenko A.
        Burden of unintended pregnancy in the United States: potential savings with increased use of long-acting reversible contraception.
        Contraception. 2013; 87: 154-161
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        • Frohwirth L.
        • Jerman J.
        • Popkin R.
        • Ethier K.
        Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2013; 26: 86-95
        • Hatcher R.A.
        Contraceptive technology. 20th rev. ed. Ardent Media, New York, NY2011
        • O'Neil-Callahan M.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Zhao Q.
        • Madden T.
        • Secura G.
        Twenty-four-month continuation of reversible contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 1083-1091
        • Varney S.J.
        • Guest J.F.
        Relative cost effectiveness of Depo-Provera, Implanon, and Mirena in reversible long-term hormonal contraception in the UK.
        Pharmacoeconomics. 2004; 22: 1141-1151
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Hirsch J.S.
        The pleasure deficit: revisiting the “sexuality connection” in reproductive health.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007; 39: 240-247
        • Skrzypulec V.
        • Drosdzol A.
        Evaluation of quality of life and sexual functioning of women using levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine contraceptive system—Mirena.
        Coll Antropol. 2008; 32: 1059-1068
        • Gorgen H.
        • Api M.
        • Akca A.
        • Cetin A.
        Use of the Levonorgestrel-IUS in the treatment of menorrhagia: assessment of quality of life in Turkish users.
        Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2009; 279: 835-840
        • Romer T.
        • Linsberger D.
        User satisfaction with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS): data from an international survey.
        Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2009; 14: 391-398
        • Lyus R.
        • Lohr P.
        • Prager S.
        Use of the Mirena LNG-IUS and Paragard CuT380A intrauterine devices in nulliparous women.
        Contraception. 2010; 81: 367-371
        • Hubacher D.
        Copper intrauterine device use by nulliparous women: review of side effects.
        Contraception. 2007; 75: S8-S11
        • Edin K.
        • Kefalas M.
        Promises I can keep: why poor women put motherhood before marriage. University of California Press, Berkeley2005
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Hirsch J.S.
        Pleasure and power: incorporating sexuality and inequality into research on contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1803-1813
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Hirsch J.S.
        • Trussell J.
        Pleasure, prophylaxis and procreation: a qualitative analysis of intermittent contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 130-137
        • Moskowitz E.
        • Jennings B.
        Directive counseling on long-acting contraception.
        Am J Public Health. 1996; 86: 787-790
        • Jones R.K.
        Beyond birth control: the overlooked benefits of oral contraceptive pills. The Guttmacher Institute, New York2011
        • Roberts D.E.
        Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. 1st. pbk. ed. Vintage, New York1999
        • Silliman J.M.
        • Fried M.G.
        • Ross L.
        • Gutierrez E.R.
        Undivided rights: women of color organize for reproductive justice. South End Press, Cambridge, MA2004
        • Gordon L.
        Woman's body, woman's right: a social history of birth control in America. Grossman, New York1976
        • Davis A.Y.
        Women, race, & class. 1st ed. Random House, New York1981
        • Dixon-Mueller R.
        Population policy & women's rights: transforming reproductive choice. Praeger, Westport, CT1993
        • Connelly M.J.
        Fatal misconception: the struggle to control world population. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA2008
        • Jones J.
        • Mosher W.D.
        • Daniels K.
        • Division of vital statistics
        Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006–2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995. National Council for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD2012 (Contract No.: no. 60.)
        • Roberts D.
        From Norplant to the contraceptive vaccine: new frontiers of population control.
        in: Ratcliff K.S. Women and health: power, technology, and conflict in a gendered world. Allyn and Bacon, Boston2002: 197-204
        • Finer L.B.
        • Jerman J.
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 98: 893-897
        • Malat J.
        Racial differences in Norplant use in the United States.
        Soc Sci Med. 2000; 50: 1297-1308
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Ruskin R.
        • Grumbach K.
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • Bibbins-Domingo K.
        • Schillinger D.
        • et al.
        Recommendations for intrauterine contraception: a randomized trial of the effects of patients' race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 319.e1-319.e8
        • Schoen J.
        Choice & coercion: birth control, sterilization, and abortion in public health and welfare. University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill2005
        • Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice
        A new vision for advancing our movement for reproductive health, reproductive rights, and reproductive justice. Asian Communities for Reproductive Justice, SisterSong Women of Color Reproductive Health Collective, Oakland, CA2005