Original research article| Volume 89, ISSUE 6, P564-571, June 2014

Download started.


Who chooses vasectomy in Rwanda? Survey data from couples who chose vasectomy, 2010-2012



      Vasectomy is safe and highly effective; however, it remains an underused method of family planning (FP) in Africa. In view of this, three Rwandan physicians were trained in no-scalpel vasectomy with thermal cautery and fascial interposition on the prostatic end as vasectomy trainers in 2010, and this initiative has resulted in over 2900 vasectomy clients from February 2010 to December 2012.

      Study design

      This cross-sectional descriptive study describes vasectomy clients (n=316) and their wives (n=300) from 15 randomly selected hospitals in Rwanda.


      The vasectomy clients were mainly over age 40, had young children (age <3) and were married and cohabiting. Limited financial resources, satisfaction with existing family size and avoiding side effects from hormonal methods (wives′) were key motivators for vasectomy uptake. High rates of previous FP use and high degree of interspousal communication are known correlates of higher FP use.


      Future and current Rwandan FP programs and other interested parties will benefit from understanding which couples elect vasectomy, their motivations for doing so and their service utilization experiences. Better integration of vasectomy counseling and postvasectomy procedures will benefit the program.


      Until this project, vasectomy projects in sub-Saharan Africa were viewed as unrealistic. This study confirms factors influencing vasectomy uptake identified in earlier research, but does so within a robust sample of vasectomy users and their wives and provides a strong understanding of who likely vasectomy users are in this context. Promotion of vasectomy services should be considered as an essential element of a healthy contraceptive method mix.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Trussell J.
        Update on and correction to the cost-effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.
        Contraception. 2012; 85: 611
        • Shih G.
        • Dube K.
        • Sheinbein M.
        • Borrero S.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        He's a real man: a qualitative study of the social context of couples' vasectomy decisions among a racially diverse population.
        Am J Mens Health. 2012; 7: 206-213
        • Shih G.
        • Turok D.K.
        • Parker W.J.
        Vasectomy: the other (better) form of sterilization.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 310-315
        • Pile J.M.
        • Barone M.A.
        Demographics of vasectomy—USA and international.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2009; 36: 295-305
      1. United Nations, Department of Social and Economic Affairs, Division P. World contraceptive use — 2011.

        • Dunmoye O.O.
        • Moodley J.
        • Popis M.
        Vasectomy in developing countries.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2001; 21: 295-297
      2. USAID. The Acquire Project: ‘Get a Permanent Smile' — increasing awareness of, access to, and utilization of vasectomy services in Ghana. 2005.

        • Bunce A.
        • Guest G.
        • Searing H.
        • Frajzyngier V.
        • Riwa P.
        • Kanama J.
        • et al.
        Factors affecting vasectomy acceptability in Tanzania.
        Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2007; 33: 13-21
      3. National Population Commission (NPC) [Nigeria] and ICF Macro. Nigeria demographic and health survey 2008. Abuja, Nigeria, 2009.

        • Ezegwui H.U.
        • Enwereji J.O.
        Attitude of men in Nigeria to vasectomy.
        Int Health. 2009; 1: 169-172
      4. Lynam P, Dwyer J, Wilkinson D, Landry E. Vasectomy in Kenya: the first steps. AVSC working paper. 1993; no. 4.

        • Manhoso F.R.
        • Hoga L.A.
        Men's experiences of vasectomy in the Brazilian Public Health Service.
        Int Nurs Rev. 2005; 52: 101-108
        • Shih G.
        • Dube K.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        “We never thought of a vasectomy”: a qualitative study of men and women's counseling around sterilization.
        Contraception. 2012; 88: 376-381
        • Labrecque M.
        • Kagabo L.
        • Shattuck D.
        • Wesson J.
        • Rushanika C.
        • Tshibanbe D.
        • et al.
        Strengthening vasectomy services in Rwanda: introduction of thermal cautery with fascial interposition.
        Contraception. 2012; 87: 375-379
        • Labrecque M.
        • Dufresne C.
        • Barone M.A.
        • St-Hilaire K.
        Vasectomy surgical techniques: a systematic review.
        BMC Med. 2004; 2: 21
        • Sokal D.C.
        • Labrecque M.
        Effectiveness of vasectomy techniques.
        Urol Clin North Am. 2009; 36: 317-329
      5. National Institute of Statistics of Rwanda (NISR) [Rwanda], Ministry of Health (MOH) [Rwanda] and ICF International. Rwanda demographic and health survey 2010. Calverton, Maryland, USA: 2011.

        • Shattuck D.
        • Kerner B.
        • Gilles K.
        • Hartmann M.
        • Ng'ombe T.
        • Guest G.
        Encouraging contraceptive uptake by motivating men to communicate about family planning: the Malawi Male Motivator project.
        Am J Public Health. 2011; 101: 1089-1095
        • Hartmann M.
        • Gilles K.
        • Shattuck D.
        • Kerner B.
        • Guest G.
        Changes in couples' communication as a result of a male-involvement family planning intervention.
        J Health Commun. 2012; 17: 802-819
      6. USAID Africa Bureau. Three successful sub-Saharan Africa family planning programs: lessons for meeting the MDGs. 2012. p. 1–31.