Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Estimates of contraceptive failure from the 2002 National Survey of Family Growth.Contraception. 2008; 77: 10-21
- Coitus interruptus is not contraception.Sex Transm Dis. 2011; 38: 356
- Withdrawal: “a very great deal better than nothing".Can J Hum Sex. 2003; 12: 189-190
- Use of contraception in the United States: 1982–2008.Vital Health Stat. 2010; 23: 1-44
- 2006-2010, National Survey of Family Growth.Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD2011
- Better than nothing or savvy risk-reduction practice? The importance of withdrawal.Contraception. 2009; 79: 407-410
- Prevalence, correlates, and sexually transmitted infection risk related to coitus interruptus among African–American adolescents.Sex Transm Dis. 2009; 36: 218-220
- Race, ethnicity and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001–2007.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011; 43: 181-187
- Factors associated with contraceptive choice and inconsistent method use, United States, 2004.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 94-104
- Do racial and ethnic differences in contraceptive attitudes and knowledge explain disparities in method use?.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 150-158
- Comparability of contraceptive prevalence estimates for women from the 2002 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.Public Health Rep. 2008; 123: 147-154
- Pleasure, prophylaxis and procreation: a qualitative analysis of intermittent contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 130-137
- Withdrawal (coitus interruptus) as a sexual risk reduction strategy: perspectives from African–American adolescents.Arch Sex Behav. 2009; 38: 779-787
- Withdrawal attitudes and experiences: a qualitative perspective among young urban adults.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010; 42: 102-109
- Changes in out-of-pocket payments for contraception by privately insured women during implementation of the federal contraceptive coverage requirement.Contraception. 2014; 89: 97-102
- Design and implementation of an online weekly journal to study unintended pregnancies.Vienna Yearb Popul Res. 2011; 9: 327-334
- Why withdrawal? Why not withdrawal? Men's perspectives.Reprod Health Matters. 2015; 13: 164-173
- Delayed application of condoms, withdrawal and negotiation of safer sex among heterosexual young adults.AIDS Care. 2004; 16: 315-322
- Sexual event-level characteristics of condom use during anal intercourse among HIV-negative men who have sex with men.Sex Transm Dis. 2012; 39: 550-555
- Arousal loss related to safer sex and risk of pregnancy: implications for women's and men's sexual health.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009; 41: 150-157
- Condom use during most recent anal intercourse event among a U.S. sample of men who have sex with men.J Sex Med. 2012; 9: 1037-1047
- Use of withdrawal (coitus interruptus) for both pregnancy and HIV prevention among young adults in Rakai, Uganda.University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI2013
- Use of withdrawal and unintended pregnancy among females 15–24 years of age.Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 595-600
☆Conflicts of interest: The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.
☆☆Funding: The Continuity and Change in Contraceptive Use Study, on which this analysis was based, was supported by the JPB Foundation.