Original research article| Volume 90, ISSUE 5, P522-528, November 2014

IUDs as EC? Limited awareness and high reported acceptability: evidence from Argentina



      We explored knowledge and attitudes regarding the copper intrauterine device (IUD) as emergency contraception (EC) among women in Buenos Aires, Argentina.

      Study design

      We interviewed a convenience sample of women attending a family planning center at a public hospital. Participants were asked about knowledge and use of contraceptives, including EC (pre-script). Then they were given information about the IUD as EC and subsequently asked about acceptability of using the copper IUD as EC (post-script), the primary outcome in this analysis.


      We analyzed data on 273 women. While only 1.83% of participants knew the IUD served as EC at baseline, 79.85% said they would be willing to use the device as such if the need arose after given relevant information. Multivariate results from a pre-script revealed that women with low levels of education and those born outside of Argentina were less knowledgeable about EC pills. Only previous use of the IUD was associated with high levels of IUD knowledge. Post-script, results indicated that being Argentine [odds ratio (OR)=2.15, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.21, 3.81] and previous IUD use (OR=2.12, 95% CI=1.07, 4.19) were positively associated with considering the IUD as EC. Nulliparity was negatively associated with willingness to use the IUD as EC (OR=0.44, 95% CI 0.22, 0.86).


      We examined acceptability of the copper IUD as EC in a Latin American setting and found that, while prior levels of knowledg'e were low, acceptability of the IUD as EC was high. Implications for programming and policy include outreach and education regarding this highly effective method and advocacy to change existing regulations in Argentina prohibiting the use of IUD as EC.


      After given information about the IUD as a method of EC, women interviewed said they would be willing to use the IUD EC despite their limited prior knowledge of this method. With more widespread information and availability of the IUD as EC, more women may opt for this highly effective method, which can provide additional protection against unwanted pregnancy for up to 10 years.


      intrauterine device (IUD), emergency contraception (EC), EC pill (ECP), odds ratio (OR), confidence interval (CI)


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Alton T.M.
        • Brock G.N.
        • Yang D.
        • Wilking D.A.
        • Hertweck S.P.
        • Loveless M.B.
        Retrospective review of intrauterine device in adolescent and young women.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2012; 25: 195-200
        • Grimes D.A.
        Intrauterine devices (IUDs).
        in: Hatcher R.A. Trussell J. Nelson A.L. Cates W. Stewart F.H. Kowal D. Contraceptive Technology. PDR Network, New York2008: 117-139
        • Dean G.
        • Schwarz E.B.
        Intrauterine contraceptives (IUCs).
        in: Hatcher Robert A. Trussell James Nelson Anita L. Contraceptive Technology. 20th revised ed. Ardent Media, New York2011: 147-191
        • World Health Organization
        Intrauterine devices: medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use.
        4th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva2009
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        ACOG Committee Opinion No. 392, December 2007. Intrauterine device and adolescents.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1493-1495
        • Lippes J.
        • Malik T.
        • Tatum H.J.
        The postcoital copper-T.
        Adv Plan Parent. 1976; 11: 24-29
        • Cleland K.
        • Zhu H.
        • Goldstuck N.
        • Cheng L.
        • Trussell J.
        The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.
        Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 1994-2000
        • Turok D.
        • Godfrey E.
        • Wojdyla D.
        • Dermish A.
        • Torres L.
        • Wu S.
        Copper T380 intrauterine device for emergency contraception: highly effective at any time in the menstrual cycle.
        Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 2672-2676
        • Wright R.L.
        • Frost C.J.
        • Turok D.K.
        A qualitative exploration of emergency contraception users’ willingness to select the copper IUD.
        Contraception. 2012; 85: 32-35
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Kavanaugh M.
        • Douglas E.
        • Dubowitz T.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Interest in intrauterine contraception among seekers of emergency contraception and pregnancy testing.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 833-839
        • Asker C.
        • Stokes-Lampard H.
        • Beavan J.
        • Wilson S.
        What is it about intrauterine devices that women find unacceptable? Factors that make women non-users: a qualitative study.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2006; 32: 89-94
        • Averbach S.
        • Lester F.
        • Fortin J.
        • Byamugisha J.
        • Goldberg A.
        • Kakaire O.
        Acceptability of the IUD among women who opted out of a randomized controlled trial of intracesarean insertion of the copper-T 380A in Kampala, Uganda.
        Contraception. 2012; 86 ([Abstract]): 318
        • Forrest J.D.
        U.S. women’s perceptions of and attitudes about the IUD.
        Obstet Gynecol Surv. 1996; 51: S30-S34
        • Gutin S.A.
        • Mlobeli R.
        • Moss M.
        • Buga G.
        • Morroni C.
        Survey of knowledge, attitudes and practices surrounding the intrauterine device in South Africa.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 145-150
        • Katz K.R.
        • Johnson L.M.
        • Janowitz B.
        • Carranza J.M.
        Reasons for the low level of IUD use in El Salvador.
        Int Fam Plan Perspect. 2002; 28: 26-31
        • McDonald-Mosley R.
        • Philips K.
        • Ditzian L.
        • Cremer M.
        Acceptability of the intrauterine device among women in El Salvador.
        Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2010; 108: 155-157
        • van Zijl S.
        • Morroni C.
        • van der Spuy Z.M.
        A survey to assess knowledge and acceptability of the intrauterine device in the Family Planning Services in Cape Town, South Africa.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2010; 36: 73-78
        • Whitaker A.K.
        • Johnson L.M.
        • Harwood B.
        • Chiappetta L.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Gold M.A.
        Adolescent and young adult women’s knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 211-217
        • Turok D.K.
        • Gurtcheff S.E.
        • Handley E.
        • Simonsen S.E.
        • Sok C.
        • North R.
        • et al.
        A survey of women obtaining emergency contraception: are they interested in using the copper IUD?.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 441-446
        • Bharadwaj P.
        • Saxton J.C.
        • Mann S.N.
        • Jungmann E.M.A.
        • Stephenson J.M.
        What influences young women to choose between the emergency contraceptive pill and an intrauterine device? A qualitative study.
        Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011; 16: 201-209
      1. Situación de la población en la Argentina.
        Population Fund of the United Nations in Argentina (UNFPA), Buenos Aires, Argentina2009
        • Pecheny M.
        Emergency contraception in Argentina: grey areas of common sense and public policy.
        Glob Public Health. 2010; 5: 266-279
        • Censo Nacional de Población Hogares y Viviendas
        Buenos Aires, Argentina: National Institute of Statistics and Census, National Census of Population and Housing.
        • National Population Advisory (ADNdP, Argentina)
        Encuesta sobre migración, fecundidad y familia, EMFF 2011.
        Dirección Nacional de Población, Registro Nacional de las Personas: Ministerio del Interior, Presidencia de la Nación, Buenos Aires2011
        • Belló M.
        • Becerril-Montekio V.
        Sistema de salud de Argentina.
        Salud Pública Méx. 2011; 53: S97-S108
        • Pantelides E.
        • Moreno M.J.
        Situación de la población en Argentina.
        UNFPA, Buenos Aires2009 ([9789871560134])
      2. Contraceptive Use in the United States.
        Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY2013
        • Palermo T.
        • Bleck J.
        • Westley E.
        Knowledge and use of emergency contraception: a multi-country analysis.
        International Perspectives in Sexual and Reproductive Health. 2014 ([in press])
        • Clement K.M.
        • Mansour D.J.
        Improving uptake of the copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception by educating pharmacists in the community.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2013; 40: 41-45