Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 90, ISSUE 5, P542-547, November 2014

A systematic approach to improving intrauterine device services in family planning clinics

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To improve the quality of intrauterine device (IUD) services at Title X clinics.

      Study Design

      Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) is a step-by-step approach, adopted for healthcare, in which team members evaluate the systems and processes of a specific type of clinical care (e.g., IUD care) in order to identify practices that contribute to poor quality, unsafe, unreliable, or inefficient care. These weaknesses are termed “failures.” The FMECA uses qualitative (e.g., meetings) and quantitative (e.g., clinical operations) data to determine failure frequency and impact in order to prioritize the parts of a clinical care system or process to be redesigned and improved.
      An FMECA was conducted in three community-based Title X family planning clinics on the South and West Sides of Chicago, IL with all care team members; IUD clients were also interviewed regarding their visit. Clinic administrative data was also assessed to determine the frequency and impact of the identified failures.

      Results

      After combining the FMECA and clinical operations data, “critical” areas across all three clinics were: (1) client does not show up for or cancels appointment; (2) client is ineligible for an IUD insertion due to unprotected intercourse; and (3) limited time for counseling, informing, and placing IUDs. As most insertions were successful, failed IUD insertion was not considered a high-risk failure.

      Conclusions

      This process revealed that the failures most in need of improvement and redesign were the scheduling and intake processes and the lack of time for counseling during certain types of visits.

      Implications

      A systematic assessment of the underlying problems in IUD-care revealed three important issues across three clinics: (1) client does not show up for appointment or cancels appointment; (2) client recently had unprotected intercourse; and (3) limited time for counseling, informing, and placing IUDs.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer L.B.
        • Zolna M.R.
        Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001–2008.
        Am J Public Health. 2014; 104: S43-S48https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2013.301416
        • Finer L.B.
        • Jerman J.
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007–2009.
        Fertil Steril. 2012; 98: 893-897
        • Bergin A.
        • Tristan S.
        • Terplan M.
        • Gilliam M.L.
        • Whitaker A.K.
        A missed opportunity for care: two-visit IUD insertion protocols inhibit placement.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 694-697
        • Services NSE
        Failure modes and effects analysis.
        Report No.: NS-ES-0127 (75370). Westinghouse Electric Company 2008, Pittsburgh2008
      1. Implementing safety management systems in aviation.
        in: JJ Goglia C.H. Stolzer A.J. Ashgate Publishing Co, Burlington, VT2011
        • Burgmeier J.
        Failure mode and effect analysis: an application in reducing risk in blood transfusion.
        Jt Comm J Qual Client Saf. 2002; 28: 331-339
        • Robinson D.
        • Heigham M.
        • Clark J.
        Using failure mode and effects analysis for safe administration of chemotherapy to hospitalized children with cancer.
        Jt Comm J Qual Client Saf. 2006; 32: 161-166
        • Nickerson T.
        • Jenkins M.
        • Greenall J.
        Using ISMP Canada’s framework for failure mode and effects analysis: A tale of two FMEAs.
        Healthc Q. 2008; 11 ([spec. no. 1]): 40-46
        • Esmail R.
        • Cummings C.
        • Dersch D.
        • Duchscherer G.
        • Glowa J.
        • Ligget G.
        • et al.
        Using healthcare failure mode and effect analysis tool to review the process of ordering and administering potassium chloride and potassium phosphate.
        Healthc Q. 2005; 8: 73-80
        • Apkon M.
        • Leonard J.
        • Probst L.
        • DeLizio L.
        • Vitale R.
        Design of a safer approach to intravenous drug infusions: Failure mode effects analysis.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2004; 13: 265-271
        • Kunac D.
        • Reith D.
        Identification of priorities for medication safety in neonatal intensive care.
        Drug Saf. 2005; 28: 251-261
        • van Tilburg C.
        • Leistikow I.
        • Rademaker C.
        • Bierings M.
        • van Dijk A.
        Health care failure mode and effect analysis: A useful proactive risk analysis in a paediatric oncology ward.
        Qual Saf Health Care. 2006; 15: 58-64
        • Kimehi-Woods J.
        • Shultz J.
        Using HFMEA to assess potential for client harm from tubing misconnections.
        Jt Comm J Qual Client Saf. 2006; 32: 373-381
        • Saxena S.
        • Kempf R.
        • Wilcox S.
        • et al.
        Critical laboratory value notification: a failure mode effects and criticality analysis.
        Jt Comm J Qual Client Saf. 2005; 31: 495-506
        • Linkin D.
        • Sausman C.
        • Santos L.
        • Lyons C.
        • Fox C.
        • Aumiller L.
        • et al.
        Applicability of healthcare failure mode and effects analysis to healthcare epidemiology: Evaluation of the sterilization and use of surgical instruments.
        Clin Infect Dis. 2005; 41: 1014-1019
        • Kozakiewicz J.
        • Benis L.
        • Fisher S.
        • Marseglia J.
        Safe chemotherapy administration: using failure mode and effects analysis in computerized prescriber order entry.
        Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005; 62: 1813-1816
        • Steinberger D.M.
        Use of failure mode and effects analysis for proactive identification of communication and handoff failures from organ procurement to transplantation.
        Prog Transplant. 2009; 19: 208-214
      2. Institute for healthcare improvement.
        (Available from:) ([Accessed April 14, 2014])
        • Coles G.
        • Young J.
        Use of failure modes effects and criticality analyses to improve impatient safety.
        Safety Analysis and Risk Assessment Division of the 2002 ASME International Congress and Exposition, New Orleans, LA2002
        • Institute of Medicine
        A review of the HHS family planning program: mission, management and measurement of results.
        Institute of Medicine, Washington, DC2009
        • Turock D.K.
        • Godfrey E.M.
        • Wojdyla D.
        • Dermish A.
        • Torres L.
        • Wu S.C.
        Copper T380 intrauterine device for emergency contraception: highly effective at any time in the menstrual cycle.
        Hum Reprod. 2013; 28: 2672-2676https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/det330. Epub 2013 Aug 14