Advertisement
Commentary| Volume 90, ISSUE 5, P472-475, November 2014

Global family planning metrics — time for new definitions?

      In 2012, the groundbreaking London Summit on Family Planning [
      • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
      • DFID Press Office
      Landmark summit puts women at heart of global health agenda [press release].
      ] galvanized support for the far-reaching benefits of contraception. Funders, government leaders and other global partners made commitments to expanding access to rights-based family planning services for an additional 120 million women and girls by 2020 [
      • Brown W.
      • Druce N.
      • Bunting J.
      • Radloff S.
      • Koroma D.
      • Gupta S.
      • et al.
      Developing the “120 by 120” Goal for the global FP 2020 initiative.
      ]. This ambitious goal has been branded as FP2020, and a formal secretariat was established under the UN Foundation to facilitate the implementation and coordinate contributions from key stakeholders.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
        • DFID Press Office
        Landmark summit puts women at heart of global health agenda [press release].
        Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and DFID, Seattle, WA, and London2012 ([cited 2012 Nov 12, Available from: http://www.londonfamilyplanningsummit.co.uk/1530%20FINAL%20press%20release.pdf])
        • Brown W.
        • Druce N.
        • Bunting J.
        • Radloff S.
        • Koroma D.
        • Gupta S.
        • et al.
        Developing the “120 by 120” Goal for the global FP 2020 initiative.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2014; 45: 73-84
        • Darroch J.E.
        • Singh S.
        Trends in contraceptive need and use in developing countries in 2003, 2008, 2012: An analysis of national surveys.
        Lancet. 2013; 381: 1756-1762
        • Cleland J.
        • Shah I.H.
        The contraceptive revolution: focused efforts are still needed.
        Lancet. 2013; 381: 1604-1606
        • Winner B.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Zhao Q.
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of longer-acting reversible contraception.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1998-2007
        • Peterson H.B.
        • Darmstadt G.L.
        • Bongaarts J.
        Meeting the unmet need for family planning. Now is the time.
        Lancet. 2013; 381: 1696-1699
        • Trussell T.
        • Guthrie K.A.
        Choosing a contraceptive: efficacy, safety, and personal considerations.
        (Chapter 3)in: Hatcher R.A. Trussell J.E. Nelson A.M. Cates Jr., W. Kowal D. Contraceptive technology. Twentieth ed. Ardent Media, New York2011: 45-54
        • Hardee K.
        • Kumar J.
        • Newman K.
        • Bakamjian L.
        • Harris S.
        • Rodríguez M.
        • et al.
        Voluntary, human rights–based family planning: a conceptual framework.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2014; 45: 1-18
        • Forrest J.D.
        Timing of reproductive life stages.
        Obstet Gynecol. 1993; 82: 105-111
        • Bruce J.
        Fundamental elements of the quality of care: a simple framework.
        Stud Fam Plann. 1990; 2: 61-91
      1. Hatcher R.A. Trussell J.E. Nelson A.M. Cates Jr., W. Kowal D. Contraceptive technology. Twentieth ed. Ardent Media, New York2011
        • World Health Organization Department of Reproductive Health and Research
        • Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health/Center for Communications Programs
        Family planning: a global handbook for providers (2011 update).
        WHO, Geneva2011
        • Ross J.
        • Stover J.
        Use of modern contraception increases when more methods become available: analysis of evidence from 1982-2009.
        Glob Health Sci Pract. 2013; ([Epub July 26, 2013])https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-13-00010
        • Ali M.M.
        • Cleland J.
        • Shah I.H.
        Causes and consequences of contraceptive discontinuation: evidence from 60 demographic and health surveys.
        World Health Organization, Geneva2012
        • Sonfield A.
        • Frost J.J.
        • Gold R.B.
        Estimating the impact of expanding Medicaid eligibility for family planning services: 2011 update.
        Guttmacher Institute, New York2011: 38
        • Fry K.
        • Weinberger M.
        • Marin C.
        • Nuccio O.
        • Reichwein B.
        Adding equity into our metrics: MSI's new High Impact CYPs.
        in: Presentation, International Conference on Family Planning, Addis Ababa. 2013
        • Seims S.
        • Khadduri R.
        Measuring improvements in sexual and reproductive health and rights in sub-Saharan Africa.
        Reprod Health Matters. 2012; 20: 177-187
        • Bradley S.E.K.
        • Croft T.N.
        • Fisher J.D.
        • Westoff C.F.
        Revising unmet need for family planning.
        DHS Analytical Studies No. 25. ICF International, Calverton, Maryland, USA2012
        • Starbird E.H.
        • Fabric M.S.
        • Choi V.
        USAID’s family planning and reproductive health portfolio.
        2014 ([Presented May 19, 2014])
        • Cates Jr., W.
        • Abdool-Karim Q.
        • El-Sadr W.
        • Haffner D.W.
        • Kalema-Zikusoka G.
        • Rogo K.
        • et al.
        Global development, family planning and the millennium development goals.
        Science. 2010; 329: 1603