Abstract
Objective
Most states with 24-h waiting periods prior to abortion provide state resource directories
to women seeking abortion. Our objective was to evaluate the information on abortion
provided on the websites of crisis pregnancy centers listed in these resource directories.
Study design
We performed a survey of the websites of crisis pregnancy centers referenced in state
resource directories for pregnant women. We searched for these state-provided resource
directories online. We contacted state Departments of Health and Human Services for
a print copy when a directory could not be found online. The crisis pregnancy center
websites were evaluated for the information provided on abortion. Standardized data
collection tools were used. Descriptive statistics were generated.
Results
Resource directories of 12 states were procured. A total of 254 websites referring
to 348 crisis pregnancy centers were identified. Overall, a total of 203/254 [80%,
95% confidence interval (CI) 75%–84%] of websites provided at least one false or misleading
piece of information. The most common misleading or false information included on
the websites were a declared link between abortion and mental health risks (122/254
sites; 48%, 95% CI 42%–54%), preterm birth (54/254; 21%, 95% CI 17%–27%), breast cancer
(51/254; 20%, 95% CI 16%–25%) and future infertility (32/254; 13%, 95% CI 9%–17%).
Conclusion
Most crisis pregnancy centers listed in state resource directories for pregnant women
provide misleading or false information regarding the risks of abortion. States should
not list agencies that provide inaccurate information as resources in their directories.
Keywords
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ContraceptionAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- An overview of abortion laws.State policies in brief. Guttmacher, New York2013 ([http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_OAL.pdf, accessed October 24, 2013])
- False and misleading health information provided by federally-funded pregnancy resource centers.United States House of Representatives, 2006
- Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.Contraception. 2012; 86: 752-756
- Shortcomings of health information on the Internet.Health Promot Int. 2003; 18: 381-386
- Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63: 24-28
- Counseling and waiting periods for abortion.State Policies In Brief. Guttmacher, New York2013 ([http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_MWPA.pdf, accessed October 24, 2013])
- Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.Stat Med. 1998; 17: 857-872
- ‘Choose Life’ license plates.State policies in brief. Guttmacher, New York2013 ([http://www.guttmacher.org/statecenter/spibs/spib_CLLP.pdf accessed October 24, 2013])
- The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 215-219
- Stigma and abortion complications in the United States.Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 1472-1474
- Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences.Womens Health Issues. 2011; 21: S49-S54
- Abortion and mental health: evaluating the evidence.Am Psychol. 2009; 64: 863-890
- Examining the association of abortion history and current mental health: a reanalysis of the National Comorbidity Survey using a common-risk-factors model.Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72: 72-82
- Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion.2008 ([Washington, D.C.])
- Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995–2009.Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 199: 180-186
- Fatal flaws in a recent meta-analysis on abortion and mental health.Contraception. 2012; 86: 430-437
- Post-abortion syndrome: creating an affliction.Bioethics. 2010; 24: 445-452
- Does the outcome of a first pregnancy predict depression, suicidal ideation, or lower self-esteem? Data from the National Comorbidity Survey.Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011; 81: 193-201
- Birth outcomes after induced abortion: a nationwide register-based study of first births in Finland.Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 3315-3320
- Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses.BJOG. 2009; 116: 1425-1442
- Reproductive outcomes following induced abortion: a national register-based cohort study in Scotland.BMJ Open. 2012; 2: 1-11
- The environment and disease: association or causation?.Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58: 295-300
- Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2008; 34: 185-190
- Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth.Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 964-973
- Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth.World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2012: 20-22
- Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83?000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries.Lancet. 2004; 363: 1007-1016
Article info
Publication history
Published online: July 12, 2014
Accepted:
July 8,
2014
Received in revised form:
June 16,
2014
Received:
January 28,
2014
Footnotes
☆Presented at the Society of Family Planning Annual Meeting, Denver, Colorado, October 27–28, 2012.
☆☆Implications: Eighty percent of crisis pregnancy centers listed in state resource directories for pregnant women provide misleading or false information regarding abortion.
Identification
Copyright
© 2014 Elsevier Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.