Original research article| Volume 90, ISSUE 6, P601-605, December 2014

Crisis pregnancy center websites: Information, misinformation and disinformation



      Most states with 24-h waiting periods prior to abortion provide state resource directories to women seeking abortion. Our objective was to evaluate the information on abortion provided on the websites of crisis pregnancy centers listed in these resource directories.

      Study design

      We performed a survey of the websites of crisis pregnancy centers referenced in state resource directories for pregnant women. We searched for these state-provided resource directories online. We contacted state Departments of Health and Human Services for a print copy when a directory could not be found online. The crisis pregnancy center websites were evaluated for the information provided on abortion. Standardized data collection tools were used. Descriptive statistics were generated.


      Resource directories of 12 states were procured. A total of 254 websites referring to 348 crisis pregnancy centers were identified. Overall, a total of 203/254 [80%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 75%–84%] of websites provided at least one false or misleading piece of information. The most common misleading or false information included on the websites were a declared link between abortion and mental health risks (122/254 sites; 48%, 95% CI 42%–54%), preterm birth (54/254; 21%, 95% CI 17%–27%), breast cancer (51/254; 20%, 95% CI 16%–25%) and future infertility (32/254; 13%, 95% CI 9%–17%).


      Most crisis pregnancy centers listed in state resource directories for pregnant women provide misleading or false information regarding the risks of abortion. States should not list agencies that provide inaccurate information as resources in their directories.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. An overview of abortion laws.
        State policies in brief. Guttmacher, New York2013 ([, accessed October 24, 2013])
        • United States House of Representatives
        • Committee on Government Reform- Minority Staff
        • Special Investigations Division
        False and misleading health information provided by federally-funded pregnancy resource centers.
        United States House of Representatives, 2006
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Levi E.E.
        Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 752-756
        • Benigeri M.
        • Pluye P.
        Shortcomings of health information on the Internet.
        Health Promot Int. 2003; 18: 381-386
        • McMullan M.
        Patients using the Internet to obtain health information: how this affects the patient-health professional relationship.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2006; 63: 24-28
      2. Counseling and waiting periods for abortion.
        State Policies In Brief. Guttmacher, New York2013 ([, accessed October 24, 2013])
        • Newcombe R.G.
        Two-sided confidence intervals for the single proportion: comparison of seven methods.
        Stat Med. 1998; 17: 857-872
      3. ‘Choose Life’ license plates.
        State policies in brief. Guttmacher, New York2013 ([ accessed October 24, 2013])
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Grimes D.A.
        The comparative safety of legal induced abortion and childbirth in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 215-219
        • Harris L.H.
        Stigma and abortion complications in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 1472-1474
        • Norris A.
        • Bessett D.
        • Steinberg J.R.
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        • De Zordo S.
        • Becker D.
        Abortion stigma: a reconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences.
        Womens Health Issues. 2011; 21: S49-S54
        • Major B.
        • Appelbaum M.
        • Beckman L.
        • Dutton M.A.
        • Russo N.F.
        • West C.
        Abortion and mental health: evaluating the evidence.
        Am Psychol. 2009; 64: 863-890
        • Steinberg J.R.
        • Finer L.B.
        Examining the association of abortion history and current mental health: a reanalysis of the National Comorbidity Survey using a common-risk-factors model.
        Soc Sci Med. 2011; 72: 72-82
        • APA Task Force on Mental Health, Abortion
        Report of the APA Task Force on Mental Health and Abortion.
        2008 ([Washington, D.C.])
        • Coleman P.K.
        Abortion and mental health: quantitative synthesis and analysis of research published 1995–2009.
        Br J Psychiatry. 2011; 199: 180-186
        • Steinberg J.R.
        • Trussell J.
        • Hall K.S.
        • Guthrie K.
        Fatal flaws in a recent meta-analysis on abortion and mental health.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 430-437
        • Dadlez E.M.
        • Andrews W.L.
        Post-abortion syndrome: creating an affliction.
        Bioethics. 2010; 24: 445-452
        • Steinberg J.R.
        • Becker D.
        • Henderson J.T.
        Does the outcome of a first pregnancy predict depression, suicidal ideation, or lower self-esteem? Data from the National Comorbidity Survey.
        Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2011; 81: 193-201
        • Klemetti R.
        • Gissler M.
        • Niinimaki M.
        • Hemminki E.
        Birth outcomes after induced abortion: a nationwide register-based study of first births in Finland.
        Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 3315-3320
        • Shah P.S.
        • Zao J.
        Induced termination of pregnancy and low birthweight and preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analyses.
        BJOG. 2009; 116: 1425-1442
        • Bhattacharya S.
        • Lowit A.
        • Bhattacharya S.
        • Raja E.A.
        • Lee A.J.
        • Mahmood T.
        • et al.
        Reproductive outcomes following induced abortion: a national register-based cohort study in Scotland.
        BMJ Open. 2012; 2: 1-11
        • Hill A.B.
        The environment and disease: association or causation?.
        Proc R Soc Med. 1965; 58: 295-300
        • Shapiro S.
        Causation, bias and confounding: a hitchhiker's guide to the epidemiological galaxy Part 2. Principles of causality in epidemiological research: confounding, effect modification and strength of association.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2008; 34: 185-190
        • Committee on Practice Bulletins-Obstetrics TACoO, Gynecologists
        Practice bulletin no. 130: prediction and prevention of preterm birth.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 964-973
        • Howson C.P.K.
        • Lawn M.V.
        • Lawn J.E.
        Born too soon: the global action report on preterm birth.
        World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2012: 20-22
        • Beral V.
        • Bull D.
        • Doll R.
        • Peto R.
        • Reeves G.
        Breast cancer and abortion: collaborative reanalysis of data from 53 epidemiological studies, including 83?000 women with breast cancer from 16 countries.
        Lancet. 2004; 363: 1007-1016