Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 90, ISSUE 5, P496-501, November 2014

Download started.

Ok

Change in abortion services after implementation of a restrictive law in Texas

      Abstract

      Objectives

      In 2013, Texas passed omnibus legislation restricting abortion services. Provisions restricting medical abortion, banning most procedures after 20 weeks and requiring physicians to have hospital-admitting privileges were enforced in November 2013; by September 2014, abortion facilities must meet the requirements of ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs). We aimed to rapidly assess the change in abortion services after the first three provisions went into effect.

      Study design

      We requested information from all licensed Texas abortion facilities on abortions performed between November 2012 and April 2014, including the abortion method and gestational age (<12 weeks vs. ≥12 weeks).

      Results

      In May 2013, there were 41 facilities providing abortion in Texas; this decreased to 22 in November 2013. Both clinics closed in the Rio Grande Valley, and all but one closed in West Texas. Comparing November 2012–April 2013 to November 2013–April 2014, there was a 13% decrease in the abortion rate (from 12.9 to 11.2 abortions/1000 women age 15–44). Medical abortion decreased by 70%, from 28.1% of all abortions in the earlier period to 9.7% after November 2013 (p<0.001). Second-trimester abortion increased from 13.5% to 13.9% of all abortions (p<0.001). Only 22% of abortions were performed in the state's six ASCs.

      Conclusions

      The closure of clinics and restrictions on medical abortion in Texas appear to be associated with a decline in the in-state abortion rate and a marked decrease in the number of medical abortions.

      Implications

      Supply-side restrictions on abortion — especially restrictions on medical abortion — can have a profound impact on access to services. Access to abortion care will become even further restricted in Texas when the ASC requirement goes into effect in 2014.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Nash E.
        • Gold R.B.
        • Rowan A.
        • Rathbun G.
        • Vierboom Y.
        Laws affecting reproductive health and rights: 2013 state, policy review.
        2014 ([cited June 15, 2014])
        • Joyce T.
        The supply-side economics of abortion.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 1466-1469
        • Joyce T.J.
        • Henshaw S.K.
        • Dennis A.
        • Finer L.B.
        • Blanchard K.
        The impact of state mandatory counseling and waiting period laws on abortion: a literature review.
        Guttmacher Institute, New York2009
        • Colman S.
        • Joyce T.
        Regulating abortion: impact on patients and providers in Texas.
        J Policy Anal Manage. 2011; 30: 775-797
      1. Brief of amici curiae American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the American Medical Association in support of plaintiffs-appellees and in support of affirmance.
        ([cited June 20, 2014] Available from:)
        • Raymond E.G.
        • Shannon C.
        • Weaver M.A.
        • Winikoff B.
        First-trimester medical abortion with mifepristone 200 mg and misoprostol: a systematic review.
        Contraception. 2013; 87: 26-37
        • Census Bureau U.S.
        Population estimates.
        ([cited May 15, 2014]; Available from:)
        • Ackerman T.
        Houston abortion clinic shut down by state.
        Chronicle, Houston2014 ([cited May 1, 2014]; Available from:)
        • Jones R.K.
        • Jerman J.
        Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014; 46: 3-14
        • Freedman L.
        • Landy U.
        • Darney P.
        • Steinauer J.
        Obstacles to the integration of abortion into obstetrics and gynecology practice.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010; 42: 146-151
        • Texas Department of State Health Services
        Induced terminations of pregnancy by age and county of residence; Texas.
        ([cited July 12, 2014]; Available from:)
        • Ura A.
        As abortion clinics close, student creates travel fund. Texas Tribune.
        ([cited June 22, 2014]; Available from:)
        • White K.
        • Grossman D.
        • Hopkins K.
        • Potter J.E.
        Cutting family planning in Texas.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 367: 1179-1181
        • Martin J.A.
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Osterman J.K.
        • et al.
        Births: Final data for 2012.
        in: National vital statistics reports. vol 62 no 9. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD2013
        • Hamilton B.E.
        • Martin J.A.
        • Osterman M.J.K.
        • Curtin S.C.
        Births: Preliminar y data for 2013.
        in: National vital statistics reports web release. vol 63 no 02. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville, MD2014
        • Harvey S.M.
        • Beckman L.J.
        • Satre S.J.
        Choice of and satisfaction with methods of medical and surgical abortion among U.S. clinic patients.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 2001; 33: 212-216
        • Shochet T.
        • Trussell J.
        Determinants of demand: method selection and provider preference among US women seeking abortion services.
        Contraception. 2008; 77: 397-404
        • Grossman D.
        • Holt K.
        • Peña M.
        • Lara D.
        • Veatch M.
        • Córdova D.
        • et al.
        Self-induction of abortion among women in the United States.
        Reprod Health Matters. 2010; 18: 136-146
        • Bartlett L.A.
        • Berg C.J.
        • Shulman H.B.
        • Zane S.B.
        • Green C.A.
        • Whitehead S.
        • et al.
        Risk factors for legal induced abortion-related mortality in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2004; 103: 729-737
        • Jones R.K.
        • Kooistra K.
        Abortion incidence and access to services in the United States, 2008.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2011; 43: 41-50
        • Grossman D.
        • White K.
        • Hopkins K.
        • Potter J.E.
        The public health threat of anti-abortion legislation.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 73-74