Advertisement

Refining paracervical block techniques for pain control in first trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled noninferiority trial

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Our objective was to evaluate two different aspects of the paracervical block (PCB) technique for first trimester surgical abortion, to compare a 3-min wait prior to cervical dilation to no wait and to compare four-site with two-site injection.

      Study design

      We conducted two consecutive randomized, single-blinded noninferiority trials. In the first trial, women <11 weeks gestational age received a 20-mL 1% buffered lidocaine four-site PCB with either a 3-min wait between PCB injection and dilation or no wait. In the second trial, we compared a four-site with a two-site PCB. We evaluated dilation pain [100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS)] as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included pain at additional time points, anxiety, satisfaction and adverse events.

      Results

      Both trials fully enrolled (total n=332). Results were inconclusive as to whether no wait was noninferior to waiting 3-min prior to cervical dilation for dilation pain [VAS: 63 mm (SD, 24 mm) vs. 56 mm (SD, 32 mm)] and as to whether a two-site PCB was noninferior to a four-site block [VAS: 68 mm (SD, 21 mm) vs. 60 mm (SD, 30 mm)]. Noninferiority analysis was inconclusive because the confidence interval of the mean pain score difference between groups included the predefined inferiority margin of 13-mm pain difference. Superiority analysis showed the four-site PCB to be superior to the two-site PCB.

      Conclusion

      It remained inconclusive whether a 3-min wait time between PCB and cervical dilation provides noninferior pain control for first trimester surgical abortion. However, a four-site PCB appeared to be superior to a two-site PCB.

      Implications

      It remained inconclusive whether a 3-min wait time between PCB and cervical dilation or using a two-site instead of a four-site PCB provided noninferior pain control for first trimester surgical abortion. This study did not assess whether the combination of the two separate factors provides additive benefit.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Guttmacher
        Fact on induced abortion worldwide.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2011
        • O'Connell K
        • Jones HE
        • Simon M
        • Saporta V
        • Paul M
        • Lichtenberg ES
        First-trimester surgical abortion practices: a survey of National Abortion Federation members.
        Contraception. 2009; 79: 385-392
        • Renner RM
        • Jensen JT
        • Nichols MD
        • Edelman A
        Pain control in first trimester surgical abortion.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; CD006712
        • Renner RM
        • Nichols MD
        • Jensen JT
        • Li H
        • Edelman AB
        Paracervical block for pain control in first-trimester surgical abortion: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 1030-1037
        • Piaggio G
        • Elbourne DR
        • Pocock SJ
        • Evans SJ
        • Altman DG
        • Group C
        Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement.
        JAMA. 2012; 308: 2594-2604
        • Jensen MP
        • Chen C
        • Brugger AM
        Interpretation of visual analog scale ratings and change scores: a reanalysis of two clinical trials of postoperative pain.
        J Pain. 2003; 4: 407-414
        • Rowbotham MC
        What is a “clinically meaningful" reduction in pain?.
        Pain. 2001; 94: 131-132
        • Todd KH
        • Funk KG
        • Funk JP
        • Bonacci R
        Clinical significance of reported changes in pain severity.
        Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 27: 485-489
        • Phair N
        • Jensen JT
        • Nichols MD
        Paracervical block and elective abortion: the effect on pain of waiting between injection and procedure.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002; 186: 1304-1307
        • Glantz JC
        • Shomento S
        Comparison of paracervical block techniques during first trimester pregnancy termination.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2001; 72: 171-178