Original research article| Volume 94, ISSUE 2, P168-172, August 2016

What women seek from a pregnancy resource center



      Twenty-nine states enable taxpayer funding to go to pregnancy resource centers (PRCs, often called crisis pregnancy centers), which are usually antiabortion organizations that aim to dissuade women from abortion. Some abortion rights advocates have called for the elimination of PRCs. However, we know little about why women visit PRCs.

      Study design

      We analyzed deidentified intake survey data from first-time clients to a secular, all-options PRC located in Indiana between July and December 2015 on their reason(s) for seeking services, material resources provided and content of any peer counseling. We analyzed visitor logs of all (not just first-time) clients for repeat clients. Frequencies were computed in Excel.


      A total of 273 first-time clients visited the PRC during the study period. Their most frequent reason for seeking services was free diapers (87%), followed by baby clothes/items (44%). They most frequently discussed parenting resources/referrals in peer counseling (55%). Only 6% of clients discussed pregnancy options and only 2% discussed abortion during peer counseling. Nearly half of the PRC's total clients were repeat visitors.


      PRC clients largely sought parenting, not pregnancy, resources. The underutilization of pregnancy-options counseling and high demand for parenting materials and services point to unmet needs among caregivers of young children, particularly for diapers. Our findings are limited in their generalizability to typical PRCs, which are conservative Christian and antiabortion. Nonetheless, our results suggest the need to rethink the allocation of resources toward funding or eliminating PRCs solely for the purpose of influencing women's decisions about abortion.


      Understanding the services women who go to PRCs seek (i.e. diapers and parenting support) can help women's health advocates better meet those needs, notably in contexts that are nonjudgmental about women's pregnancy decisions.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • NARAL Pro-Choice America
        Crisis Pregnancy Centers Lie: The Insidious Threat to Reproductive Freedom.
        Date: 2015
        (December 16, 2015; Available from:)
        • Edsall T.
        Grants Flow To Bush Allies On Social Issues, in Washington Post.
        • Kelly K.
        In the name of the mother: renegotiating conservative Women's Authority in the Crisis Pregnancy Center Movement.
        Signs. 2012; 38: 203-230
        • Munson Z.W.
        The making of pro-life activists: how social movement mobilization works.
        University of Chicago Press, Chicago2008
        • Kelly K.
        Evagelical underdogs, intrinsic success, organizational solidarity, and marginalized identities as religious movement resources.
        J Contemp Ethnogr. 2014; 43: 419-455
        • Jones R.K.
        • Jerman J.
        Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2011.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014; 46: 3-14
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Levi E.E.
        Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 752-756
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Narasimhan S.
        • Bryant-Comstock K.
        • Levi E.E.
        Crisis pregnancy center websites: information, misinformation, and disinformation.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 601-605
        • Ahmed A.
        Informed decision making and abortion: crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the first amendment.
        J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43: 51-58
        • Marcotte A.
        How Crisis Pregnancy Centers Trick Women.
        Date: 2014
        (February 29, 2015; Available from:)
        • Winter M.
        The Stealth Attack on Abortion Access.
        Date: 2015
        (February 29, 2016; Available from:)
        • United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform - Minority Staff Special Investigations Division
        False and Misleading Health Information Provided by Federally Funded Pregnancy Resource Centers.
        Date: 2006
        (March 16, 2016; Available from:)
        • Hussey L.S.
        Crisis pregnancy centers, poverty, and the expanding Frontiers of American abortion politics.
        Polit Policy. 2013; 41: 985-1011
        • Hussey L.S.
        Political action versus personal action: understanding social Movements' pursuit of change through nongovernmental channels.
        Am Polit Res. 2013; 42: 409-440
        • Kelly K.
        The spread of 'Post abortion Syndrome' as social diagnosis.
        Soc Sci Med. 2014; 102: 18-25
        • LaRoche K.J.
        • Foster A.M.
        Toll free but not judgment free: evaluating Postabortion support Services in Ontario.
        Contraception. 2015; 92: 469-474
        • All-Options Pregnancy Resource Center
        Date: 2015
        (January 8, 2016; Available from:)
        • Guttmacher Institute
        State Facts About Abortion: Indiana.
        Date: 2015
        (January 22, 2016; Available from:)
        • Ellison K.
        DeLauro Introduce Legislation to Provide Diaper Assistance.
        Date: 2015
        (January 22, 2016; Available from:)
        • Finer L.B.
        • Frohwirth L.F.
        • Dauphinee L.A.
        • Singh S.
        • Moore A.M.
        Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005; 37: 110-118