Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 94, ISSUE 2, P122-126, August 2016

Download started.

Ok

Comparing office and telephone follow-up after medical abortion

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Compare proportion lost to follow-up, successful abortion, and staff effort in women who choose office or telephone-based follow-up evaluation for medical abortion at a teaching institution.

      Study design

      We performed a chart review of all medical abortions provided in the first three years of service provision. Women receiving mifepristone and misoprostol could choose office follow-up with an ultrasound evaluation one to two weeks after mifepristone or telephone follow-up with a scheduled telephone interview at one week post abortion and a second telephone call at four weeks to review the results of a home urine pregnancy test.

      Results

      Of the 176 medical abortion patients, 105 (59.7%) chose office follow-up and 71 (40.3%) chose telephone follow-up. Office evaluation patients had higher rates of completing all required follow-up compared to telephone follow-up patients (94.3% vs 84.5%, respectively, p=.04), but proportion lost to follow-up was similar in both groups (4.8% vs 5.6%, respectively, p=1.0). Medical abortion efficacy was 94.0% and 92.5% in women who chose office and telephone follow-up, respectively. We detected two (1.2%) ongoing pregnancies, both in the office group. Staff rescheduled 15.0% of appointments in the office group. For the telephone follow-up cohort, staff made more than one phone call to 43.9% and 69.4% of women at one week and four weeks, respectively.

      Conclusions

      Proportion lost to follow-up is low in women who have the option of office or telephone follow-up after medical abortion. Women who choose telephone-based evaluation compared to office follow-up may require more staff effort for rescheduling of contact, but overall outcomes are similar.

      Implications

      Although women who choose telephone evaluation may require more rescheduling of contact as compared to office follow-up, having alternative follow-up options may decrease the proportion of women who are lost to follow-up.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American College of Obstetricians and Gymecologists
        Practice bulletin no.143: medical management of first-trimester abortion.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 676-692
      1. Contraception. 2014; 89: 148-161
        • Horning E.L.
        • Chen B.A.
        • Meyn L.A.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Comparison of medical abortion follow-up with serum human chorionic gonadotropin testing and in-office assessment.
        Contraception. 2012; 85: 402-407
        • Grossman D.
        • Grindlay K.
        Alternatives to ultrasound for follow-up after medication abortion: a systematic review.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 504-510
        • Perriera L.K.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Chen B.A.
        • Hohmann H.L.
        • Hayes J.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Feasibility of telephone follow-up after medical abortion.
        Contraception. 2010; 81: 143-149
        • McKay R.J.
        • Rutherford L.
        Women's satisfaction with early home medical abortion with telephone follow-up: a questionnaire-based study in the U.K.
        J Obstet Gynaecol. 2013; 33: 601-604
        • Cameron S.T.
        • Glasie A.
        • Dewart H.
        • Johnstone A.
        • Burnside A.
        Telephone follow-up and self-performed urine pregnancy testing after early medical abortion: a service evaluation.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 67-73
        • Michie L.
        • Cameron S.T.
        Simplified follow-up after early medical abortion: 12-month experience of a telephone call and self-performed low-sensitivity urine pregnancy test.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 440-445
        • Ngoc N.T.
        • Bracken H.
        • Blum J.
        • Nga N.T.
        • Minh N.H.
        • van Nhang N.
        • et al.
        Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up after early medical abortion in Vietnam: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 88-95
        • Platais I.
        • Tsereteli T.
        • Comendant R.
        • Kurbanbekova D.
        • Winikoff B.
        Acceptability and feasibility of phone follow-up with a semiquantitative urine pregnancy test after medical abortion in Moldova and Uzbekistan.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 178-183
        • Rooney K.A.
        • Denny A.E.
        • Hou M.Y.
        • Creinin M.D.
        LARC utilization based on type of medical abortion follow-up at an academic center.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 403-405
        • Haimov-Kochman R.
        • Arbel R.
        • Sciaky-Tamir Y.
        • Brzezinski A.
        • Laufer N.
        • Yagel S.
        Risk factors for unsuccessful medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2007; 86: 462-466
        • Cameron S.T.
        • Glasier A.
        • Johnstone A.
        • Dewart H.
        • Campbell A.
        Can women determine the success of early medical termination of pregnancy themselves?.
        Contraception. 2015; 91: 6-11
        • Oppegaard K.S.
        • Qvigstad E.
        • Fiala C.
        • Heikinheimo O.
        • Benson L.
        • Gemzell-Danielsson K.
        Clinical follow-up compared with self-assessment of outcome after medical abortion: a multicentre, non-inferiority, randomised, controlled trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 385: 698-704
        • Rossi B.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Meyn L.A.
        Ability of the clinician and patient to predict the outcome of mifepristone and misoprostol medical abortion.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 313-317
        • Chen M.J.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Mifepristone with buccal misoprostol for medical abortion: a systematic review.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 12-21