Pregnancies conceived after a short interpregnancy interval (IPI), within 18 months of delivery, and unintended pregnancies are both associated with health risks. We studied risk factors for conception after a short IPI among postpartum women who plan long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).
A retrospective review of a cohort of women who delivered at University of Illinois Hospital from 2005 to 2010 and were discharged with a plan for interval LARC was performed. Outcomes were (1) attendance at a postpartum visit (PPV), (2) LARC placement (3) and conception after a short IPI. We compared variables using chi-squared test, Student's t tests and multivariable logistic regression.
Of 3548 women, 62.0% attended a PPV, 36.5% received LARC and 11.4% conceived after a short IPI. After logistic regression, women who were multiparous [odds ratio (OR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–0.91] or chose a temporary contraceptive “bridge” to LARC (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.94) were less likely to attend their PPV. Women who missed their PPV (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.05–0.08) or chose a bridge (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88) were less likely to receive LARC. Finally, women who did not receive LARC (OR 4.8, 95% CI 3.50–6.70), were multiparous (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.32–2.15) or teenaged (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.61–2.79) were more likely to conceive after a short IPI.
Women who receive postpartum LARC are less likely to become pregnant after a short IPI. Missing the PPV, multiparity and plan for a contraceptive bridge may all contribute to a patient not receiving planned LARC.
Efforts to decrease unintended pregnancy after a short IPI should focus on decreasing barriers to planned postpartum LARC. Provision of temporary bridge contraception until interval LARC may not mitigate the significant barriers associated with interval postpartum placement protocols.
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Contraception
Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
- Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 297-308
- Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent US studies.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 89: S25-S33
- Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1075-1082
- Healthy People 2020.([cited 2015 October 27]; Objective FP-5. Available from:)Date: 2015
- Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States.Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 64-71
- Interpregnancy interval and subsequent perinatal outcomes among women delaying initiation of childbearing.J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008; 34: 941-947
- Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review.Matern Child Health J. 2011; 15: 205-216
- The postpartum visit: it's time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception.Contraception. 2008; 78: 90-98
- Barriers to receiving long-acting reversible contraception in the postpartum period.Womens Health Issues. 2015;
- Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas.Contraception. 2014; 90: 488-495
- ACOG practice bulletin no. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 184-196
- Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States.Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 1471-1477
- Report to the general assembly (PA 93-0536).2014
- The contraceptive CHOICE project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 115.e1-115.e7
- Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives.Contraception. 2014; 90: 466-467
- Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception.Contraception. 2015; 92: 523-531
- Postpartum contraception: optimizing interpregnancy intervals.Contraception. 2014; 89: 487-488
Published online: August 30, 2016
Accepted: August 24, 2016
Received in revised form: August 24, 2016
Received: March 16, 2016
© 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.