Advertisement
Original research article| Volume 95, ISSUE 3, P245-250, March 2017

Factors associated with short interpregnancy interval in women who plan postpartum LARC: a retrospective study

  • Clare Harney
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author. Tel.: +1-213-842-4019 (mobile), +1-404-520-2713 (secondary mobile).
    Affiliations
    University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 820 S Wood Street, M/C 808, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: Northwestern University, 250 East Superior Street, Suite 03-2303, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
    Annie Dude
    Footnotes
    1 Present address: Northwestern University, 250 East Superior Street, Suite 03-2303, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.
    Affiliations
    University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 820 S Wood Street, M/C 808, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sadia Haider
    Affiliations
    University of Illinois at Chicago, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 820 S Wood Street, M/C 808, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
    Search for articles by this author
  • Author Footnotes
    1 Present address: Northwestern University, 250 East Superior Street, Suite 03-2303, Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Pregnancies conceived after a short interpregnancy interval (IPI), within 18 months of delivery, and unintended pregnancies are both associated with health risks. We studied risk factors for conception after a short IPI among postpartum women who plan long-acting reversible contraception (LARC).

      Study design

      A retrospective review of a cohort of women who delivered at University of Illinois Hospital from 2005 to 2010 and were discharged with a plan for interval LARC was performed. Outcomes were (1) attendance at a postpartum visit (PPV), (2) LARC placement (3) and conception after a short IPI. We compared variables using chi-squared test, Student's t tests and multivariable logistic regression.

      Results

      Of 3548 women, 62.0% attended a PPV, 36.5% received LARC and 11.4% conceived after a short IPI. After logistic regression, women who were multiparous [odds ratio (OR) 0.77, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65–0.91] or chose a temporary contraceptive “bridge” to LARC (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58–0.94) were less likely to attend their PPV. Women who missed their PPV (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.05–0.08) or chose a bridge (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.50–0.88) were less likely to receive LARC. Finally, women who did not receive LARC (OR 4.8, 95% CI 3.50–6.70), were multiparous (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.32–2.15) or teenaged (OR 2.12, 95% CI 1.61–2.79) were more likely to conceive after a short IPI.

      Conclusions

      Women who receive postpartum LARC are less likely to become pregnant after a short IPI. Missing the PPV, multiparity and plan for a contraceptive bridge may all contribute to a patient not receiving planned LARC.

      Implications

      Efforts to decrease unintended pregnancy after a short IPI should focus on decreasing barriers to planned postpartum LARC. Provision of temporary bridge contraception until interval LARC may not mitigate the significant barriers associated with interval postpartum placement protocols.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Conde-Agudelo A
        • Rosas-Bermudez A
        • Kafury-Goeta AC
        Effects of birth spacing on maternal health: a systematic review.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 196: 297-308
        • Zhu BP
        Effect of interpregnancy interval on birth outcomes: findings from three recent US studies.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005; 89: S25-S33
        • Stamilio DM
        • DeFranco E
        • Pare E
        • Odibo AO
        • Peipert JF
        • Allsworth JE
        • et al.
        Short interpregnancy interval: risk of uterine rupture and complications of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1075-1082
        • Human Services Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion
        Healthy People 2020.
        Date: 2015
        ([cited 2015 October 27]; Objective FP-5. Available from:)
        • Gemmill A
        • Lindberg LD
        Short interpregnancy intervals in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 64-71
        • Nabukera SK
        • Wingate MS
        • Kirby RS
        • Owen J
        • Swaminathan S
        • Alexander GR
        • et al.
        Interpregnancy interval and subsequent perinatal outcomes among women delaying initiation of childbearing.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2008; 34: 941-947
        • Shah PS
        • Balkhair T
        • Ohlsson A
        • Beyene J
        • Scott F
        • Frick C
        Intention to become pregnant and low birth weight and preterm birth: a systematic review.
        Matern Child Health J. 2011; 15: 205-216
        • Speroff L
        • Mishell Jr., DR
        The postpartum visit: it's time for a change in order to optimally initiate contraception.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 90-98
        • Zerden ML
        • Tang JH
        • Stuart GS
        • Norton DR
        • Verbiest SB
        Barriers to receiving long-acting reversible contraception in the postpartum period.
        Womens Health Issues. 2015;
        • Potter JE
        • Hopkins K
        • Aiken AR
        • Hubert C
        • Stevenson AJ
        • White K
        • et al.
        Unmet demand for highly effective postpartum contraception in Texas.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 488-495
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        ACOG practice bulletin no. 121: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 184-196
        • White K
        • Teal SB
        • Potter JE
        Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 1471-1477
        • Illinois Department of Healthcare and Family Services
        Report to the general assembly (PA 93-0536).
        2014
        • Secura GM
        • Allsworth JE
        • Madden T
        • Mullersman JL
        • Peipert JF
        • et al.
        The contraceptive CHOICE project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203: 115.e1-115.e7
        • Aiken AR
        • Creinin MD
        • Kaunitz AM
        • Nelson AL
        • Trussell J
        Global fee prohibits postpartum provision of the most effective reversible contraceptives.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 466-467
        • Moniz MH
        • Dalton VK
        • Davis MM
        • Forman J
        • Iott B
        • Landgraf J
        • et al.
        Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception.
        Contraception. 2015; 92: 523-531
        • Teal SB
        Postpartum contraception: optimizing interpregnancy intervals.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 487-488