Advertisement

Patient-provider conversations about sterilization: A qualitative analysis

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Although female sterilization is the second most commonly used contraceptive method in the US, research suggests that providers may serve as barriers to desired sterilization.

      Study design

      We conducted a modified grounded theory analysis of audio-recorded contraceptive counseling visits with 52 women who specified on a previsit survey that they wanted no future children and a supplemental analysis of visits with 14 women who wanted or were unsure about future children in which sterilization was mentioned.

      Results

      Sterilization was discussed in only 19 of the 52 visits, primarily with patients who were older women with children. Although some framed sterilization positively, many clinicians discouraged patients from pursuing sterilization, encouraging them instead to use long-acting reversible methods and framing the permanence of sterilization as undesirable. In the 33 remaining sessions, sterilization was not mentioned, and clinicians largely failed to solicit patients' future reproductive intentions. We found no clear patterns regarding discussion of sterilization in the 14 supplemental cases.

      Conclusion

      Clinicians did not discuss sterilization with all patients for whom it might have been appropriate and thus missed opportunities to discuss sterilization as part of the full range of appropriate methods. When they did discuss sterilization, they only infrequently presented the method in positive ways and more commonly encouraged patients to choose a long-acting reversible method instead. Clinicians may want to reflect on their counseling practices around sterilization to ensure that counseling is centered on patient preferences, rather than driven by their own assumptions about the desirability of reversibility.

      Implications

      Clinicians often fail to discuss sterilization as a contraceptive option with potentially appropriate candidates and, when they do, often discourage its selection. Clinicians should consider assessing reproductive intentions to ensure that potentially relevant methods are included in counseling.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jones J.
        • Mosher W.
        • Daniels K.
        Current contraceptive use in the United States, 2006-2010, and changes in patterns of use since 1995.
        Natl Health Stat Report. 2012; : 1-25
      1. Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 212-215
        • Borrero S.
        • Nikolajski C.
        • Rodriguez K.L.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Arnold R.M.
        • Ibrahim S.A.
        “Everything I know I learned from my mother...or not”: perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2009; 24: 312-319
        • Borrero S.
        • Zite N.
        • Potter J.E.
        • Trussell J.
        Medicaid policy on sterilization--anachronistic or still relevant?.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 102-104
        • Borrero S.
        • Zite N.
        • Potter J.E.
        • Trussell J.
        • Smith K.
        Potential unintended pregnancies averted and cost savings associated with a revised Medicaid sterilization policy.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 691-696
        • Brown B.P.
        • Chor J.
        Adding injury to injury: ethical implications of the Medicaid sterilization consent regulations.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 1348-1351
        • Gilliam M.
        • Davis S.D.
        • Berlin A.
        • Zite N.B.
        A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requests.
        Contraception. 2008; 77: 44-49
        • Potter J.E.
        • White K.
        • Hopkins K.
        • et al.
        Frustrated demand for sterilization among low-income Latinas in El Paso.
        Texas, Perspect Sex Reprod Health2012
        • Zite N.
        • Wuellner S.
        • Gilliam M.
        Failure to obtain desired postpartum sterilization: risk and predictors.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2005; 105: 794-799
        • Zite N.
        • Wuellner S.
        • Gilliam M.
        Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization.
        Contraception. 2006; 73: 404-407
        • Yee L.M.
        • Simon M.A.
        Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low-income minority women.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011; 22: 1387-1400
        • White K.
        • Hopkins K.
        • Potter J.E.
        • Grossman D.
        Knowledge and attitudes about long-acting reversible contraception among Latina women who desire sterilization.
        Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23: e257-e263
        • Jensen J.
        Permanent contraception: modern approaches to justify a new name.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 493-494
        • Allen R.H.
        • Goldberg A.B.
        • Grimes D.A.
        Expanding access to intrauterine contraception.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 201: 456e451-456e455
        • Charmaz K.
        Constructing grounded theory.
        Sage, London2006
        • Lawrence R.
        • Rasiniski K.
        • Yoon J.
        • Curlin F.A.
        Factors influencing physicians' advice about female sterilization in USA: a National Survey.
        Hum Reprod. 2011; 26: 106-111
        • Schoen J.
        Choice & coercion: birth control, sterilization, and abortion in public health and welfare.
        University of North Carolina Press, Chapel Hill, NC2005
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Fox E.
        • Sobel L.
        • Borrero S.
        Patient-centered contraceptive counseling: evidence to inform practice.
        Curr Obstet Gynecol Rep. 2016; 5: 55-63