Original research article| Volume 95, ISSUE 3, P257-262, March 2017

Intrauterine contraception after medical abortion: factors affecting success of early insertion



      To assess the success and factors affecting early intrauterine device (IUD) provision after first trimester medical termination of pregnancy (MTOP).

      Study design

      Subgroup analysis of a randomized contraceptive trial assessing the long-term effects of early provision of intrauterine contraception following abortion. Altogether, 606 women undergoing MTOP were included and followed for 3 months. The intervention group (n=307) was offered an IUD (either the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system or copper-IUD) at a follow-up visit 1–4 weeks after MTOP. The control group (n=299) contacted primary health care for follow-up and contraceptive provision. Adverse events (infections, bleeding, residual tissue and incomplete abortion) were analyzed on intention-to-treat basis and IUD expulsions on per-protocol (PP) basis.


      In the intervention group, 234 women (76.2%) received the IUD as scheduled, 46 later (altogether 91.2%). In the control group, the corresponding figures were 8 (2.7%) and 64 [altogether 24.1%, Odds ratio (OR) (95% Confidence interval (CI)) = 32.7 (20.3–52.6)]. Eighty-five (27.7%) women in the intervention group and 38 (12.7%) in the control group received treatment (administration of antibiotics, misoprostol or surgical evacuation) because of presumed adverse event [2.63 (1.72–4.01)], mainly residual tissue. In the control group, 23 (60.5%) of these occurred during the first 2 weeks. IUD expulsion occurred in 12 (5.4%) of the 222 women in the intervention group (PP basis).


      When provided as part of abortion service, most early insertions following MTOP were performed as planned. The main reason for postponement was overdiagnosis of adverse events suspected at follow-up. The rate of IUD expulsion was similar to that reported previously.


      Early insertion following MTOP is safe, and the rate of IUD expulsion is low. Most adverse events possibly delaying IUD insertion occur early. Based on timing of adverse events in the control group, IUD insertion at approximately 2 weeks after completed MTOP seems optimal.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Heikinheimo O.
        • Gissler M.
        • Suhonen S.
        Age, parity, history of abortion and contraceptive choices affect the risk of repeat abortion.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 149-154
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Madden T.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Secura G.M.
        Preventing unintended pregnancies by providing no-cost contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 1291-1297
        • Rose S.B.
        • Lawton B.A.
        Impact of long-acting reversible contraception on return for repeat abortion.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 206: 37.e1-37.e6
        • Cameron S.T.
        • Berugoda N.
        • Johnstone A.
        • Glasier A.
        Assessment of a 'fast-track' referral service for intrauterine contraception following early medical abortion.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2012; 38: 175-178
        • Grimes D.A.
        • Lopez L.M.
        • Schulz K.F.
        • Stanwood N.L.
        Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; : CD001777
        • Okusanya B.O.
        • Oduwole O.
        • Effa E.E.
        Immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine devices.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; 7: CD001777
      1. Safe abortion: technical and policy guidance for health systems.
        2nd ed. WHO, 2012 ([Geneva],
        • Goodman S.
        • Hendlish S.K.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Foster-Rosales A.
        Impact of immediate postabortal insertion of intrauterine contraception on repeat abortion.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 143-148
        • Fox M.C.
        • Oat-Judge J.
        • Severson K.
        • Jamshidi R.M.
        • Singh R.H.
        • McDonald-Mosley R.
        • et al.
        Immediate placement of intrauterine devices after first and second trimester pregnancy termination.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 34-40
        • Pohjoranta E.
        • Suhonen S.
        • Heikinheimo O.
        Attendance at post-abortal follow-up visits is low - can the risks of non-attendance be identified?.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2011; 90: 543-546
      2. Abortion statistics 2014.
        National Institute for Health and Welfare, 2015 ([, Last accessed: 8.6.2016])
      3. Abortion statistics, England and Wales 2014.
        Department of Health, 2015 ([, Last accessed: 8.6.2016])
      4. Abort - fakta med statistikk.
        Folkehelseinstituttet Norway, 2016 ([, Last accessed: 8.6.2016])
      5. Termination of pregnancy statistics.
        National Health Service Scotland, Information Services Division, 2016 ([, Last accessed: 8.6.2016])
      6. Statistik om aborter 2015. Socialstyrelsen; 2016. [, Last accessed: 8.6.2016].

      7. Induced abortion in the United States.
        Guttmacher Institute, 2016 ([, Last accessed: 8.6.2016])
        • Niinimäki M.
        • Pouta A.
        • Bloigu A.
        • Gissler M.
        • Hemminki E.
        • Suhonen S.
        • et al.
        Immediate complications after medical compared with surgical termination of pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 114: 795-804
        • Saav I.
        • Stephansson O.
        • Gemzell-Danielsson K.
        Early versus delayed insertion of intrauterine contraception after medical abortion - a randomized controlled trial.
        PLoS One. 2012; 7: e48948
        • Cameron S.
        Postabortal and postpartum contraception.
        Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28: 871-880
        • Shimoni N.
        • Davis A.
        • Ramos M.E.
        • Rosario L.
        • Westhoff C.
        Timing of copper intrauterine device insertion after medical abortion: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 623-628
        • Pohjoranta E.
        • Mentula M.
        • Gissler M.
        • Suhonen S.
        • Heikinheimo O.
        Provision of intrauterine contraception in association with first trimester induced abortion reduces the need of repeat abortion: first-year results of a randomized controlled trial.
        Hum Reprod. 2015; 30: 2539-2546
        • Current Care Guidelines: Abortion
        The Finnish medical society Duodecim.
        ([Last accessed: 29.6.2016])
        • Bednarek P.H.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Cwiak C.
        • Espey E.
        • Jensen J.T.
        • et al.
        Immediate versus delayed IUD insertion after uterine aspiration.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: 2208-2217
        • Fiala C.
        • Safar P.
        • Bygdeman M.
        • Gemzell-Danielsson K.
        Verifying the effectiveness of medical abortion; ultrasound versus hCG testing.
        Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 109: 190-195
        • Suhonen S.
        • Heikinheimo O.
        • Tikka M.
        • Haukkamaa M.
        The learning curve is rapid in medical termination of pregnancy--first-year results from the Helsinki area.
        Contraception. 2003; 67: 223-227
        • Reeves M.F.
        • Fox M.C.
        • Lohr P.A.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Endometrial thickness following medical abortion is not predictive of subsequent surgical intervention.
        Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 34: 104-109
        • Shimoni N.
        • Davis A.
        • Westhoff C.
        Can ultrasound predict IUD expulsion after medical abortion?.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 434-439