Abstract
Objective
Study design
Results
Conclusion
Implications
Keywords
1. Introduction
2. Material and methods
2.1 Data sources
Country and year of survey | Geographic region | Country income classification a Categories based on the World Bank's classification of income groups (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups): low-income countries have a gross national income (GNI) per capita less than $1025; lower-middle income countries have GNI per capita between $1026 and $4035; upper-middle income countries have GNI per capita between $4036 and $12,475; and high-income countries are those with a GNI per capita of $12,476 or more. Classifications based on GNI per capita from the year of data collection. | Circumstances under which abortion is legal b Classifications reflect country abortion laws at the time of data collection. These categories are, from most to least restrictive: to save the woman's life or prohibited altogether; to preserve health; socioeconomic grounds; and without restriction as to reason. Data are from the Center for Reproductive Rights, “The World's Abortion Laws”: http://worldabortionlaws.com/map/. | Total fertility rate (TFR) | Modern contraceptive prevalence (%) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Armenia, 2010 | Central Asia | Lower-middle income | Without restriction as to reason | 1.6 | 27.2 |
Azerbaijan, 2006 | Central Asia | Lower-middle income | Without restriction as to reason | 2.0 | 14.3 |
Belgium, 2011 | Europe | High income | Without restriction as to reason | 1.8 | 69.1 |
Congo Republic, 2011–2012 | Sub-Saharan Africa | Lower-middle income | To save the woman's life or prohibited altogether | 5.0 | 20.0 |
Gabon, 2012 | Sub-Saharan Africa | Upper-middle income | To save the woman's life or prohibited altogether | 4.0 | 19.4 |
Georgia, 2010 | Central Asia | Lower-middle income | Without restriction as to reason | 1.8 | 34.7 |
Ghana, 2007 | Sub-Saharan Africa | Low income | To preserve health | 4.3 | 15.7 |
Jamaica, 2002 | Latin America & Caribbean | Lower-middle income | To preserve health | 2.5 | 66.2 |
Kyrgyz Republic, 2012 | Central Asia | Lower-middle income | Without restriction as to reason | 3.2 | 33.7 |
Nepal, 2011 | South Asia | Low income | Without restriction as to reason | 2.5 | 43.2 |
Russia, 2011 | Central Asia | Upper-middle income | Without restriction as to reason | 1.6 | 55.0 |
Sweden, 2009 | Europe | High income | Without restriction as to reason | 1.9 | NA |
Turkey, 2003 a Categories based on the World Bank's classification of income groups (https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519-world-bank-country-and-lending-groups): low-income countries have a gross national income (GNI) per capita less than $1025; lower-middle income countries have GNI per capita between $1026 and $4035; upper-middle income countries have GNI per capita between $4036 and $12,475; and high-income countries are those with a GNI per capita of $12,476 or more. Classifications based on GNI per capita from the year of data collection. | Central Asia | Lower-middle income | Without restriction as to reason | 2.3 | 42.5 |
United States, 2004 | North America | High income | Without restriction as to reason | 2.1 | 68.1 |
2.2 Categories of reasons
2.3 Measures
2.4 Analyses
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, State Planning Organization and European Union. Ankara, Turkey.
3. Results
3.1 Main reasons for abortion
3.2 Main reasons for abortion by women's sociodemographic characteristics




3.3 Multiple reasons for abortion
Country and year of survey | Wants to postpone/space childbearing | Wants no (more) children | Socioeconomic concerns | Partner-related | Too young; parents/others object to pregnancy | Risk to maternal health | Risk to fetal health | Other | Total | N |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Armenia, 2010 | 9.7 | 47.8 | 17.9 | 3.8 | - | 9.8 | 2.8 | 8.3 | 100 | 456 |
Azerbaijan, 2006 | 3.6 | 64.1 | 10.1 | 9.6 | - | 7.0 | 1.1 | 4.5 | 100 | 1368 |
Belgium, 2011 | 18.4 | 13.3 | 22.9 | 23.0 | 11.1 | 2.9 | 1.1 | 7.3 | 100 | 29,431 |
Congo Republic, 2011–2012 | 22.6 | 5.2 | 30.4 | 15.2 | 12.3 | 8.1 | - | 6.3 | 100 | 1231 |
Gabon, 2012 | 12.6 | 6.3 | 39.5 | 15.4 | 9.8 | 9.8 | - | 6.6 | 100 | 847 |
Georgia, 2010 | 18.1 | 51.1 | 20.2 | 1.5 | - | 7.8 | - | 1.4 | 100 | 2054 |
Ghana, 2007 | 21.8 | - | 39.8 | 15.2 | 12.8 | 4.4 | 1.1 | 5.0 | 100 | 558 |
Jamaica, 2002 | - | 11.2 | 30.0 | 6.5 | - | 23.4 | 2.5 | 26.4 | 100 | 102 |
Kyrgyz Republic, 2012 | 14.6 | 15.9 | 10.7 | 9.7 | - | 44.4 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 100 | 423 |
Nepal, 2011 | 19.0 | 19.7 | 13.6 | 13.4 | 2.2 | 9.6 | 2.9 | 19.6 | 100 | 506 |
Russia, 2011 | 10.0 | 24.0 | 33.0 | 17.0 | - | 11.0 | - | 5.0 | 100 | |
Turkey, 2003 | 17.3 | 30.1 | 24.3 | 4.5 | - | 7.4 | 7.2 | 9.1 | 100 | 1689 |
United States, 2004 | 24.7 | 19.1 | 27.2 | 8.2 | 7.6 | 3.8 | 2.7 | 6.8 | 100 | 957 |
Sweden, 2009 | United States, 2004 | United States, 2008–2010 | |
---|---|---|---|
Wants to postpone childbearing | - | 27 | - |
Wants no (more) children | 21 | 47 | - |
Not financially prepared | 32 | 56 | 40 |
Interferes with future opportunities (education, work) | - | 54 | 20 |
Partner-related | 32 | 55 | 31 |
Too young; parent(s) or other(s) object to pregnancy | 1 | 25 | - |
Risk to maternal health | 8 | 11 | - |
Risk to fetal health | 1 | 11 | - |
Risk to maternal/fetal health | - | - | 12 |
Not the right time for a baby | 60 | - | 36 |
Need to focus on other children | - | - | 29 |
Not emotionally or mentally prepared | - | - | 19 |
Want a better life for the baby than she could provide | - | - | 12 |
Not independent or mature enough for a baby | - | - | 7 |
Influences from family or friends | - | - | 5 |
Don't want a baby or place baby for adoption | - | - | 4 |
Other | 1 | 25 | 1 |
N | 773 | 1160 | 954 |
4. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Appendix A.
Country | Coverage | Type of data | Year of data | Data source |
---|---|---|---|---|
Armenia | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2010 | Demographic and Health Survey |
Azerbaijan | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2006 | Demographic and Health Survey |
Belgium | Nationally representative | Official statistics | 2011 | Commission Nationale d'Evaluation Interruption de Grossesse |
Congo Republic | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2011–12 | Demographic and Health Survey |
Gabon | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2012 | Demographic and Health Survey |
Georgia | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2010 | Reproductive Health Survey |
Ghana | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2007 | Maternal Health Survey |
Jamaica | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2002 | Reproductive Health Survey |
Kyrgyz Republic | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2012 | Demographic and Health Survey |
Nepal | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2011 | Demographic and Health Survey |
Russia | Nationally representative | Population-based | 2011 | Reproductive Health Survey |
Turkey | Nationally representative (ever-married women) | Population-based | 2003 | Demographic and Health Survey |
Sweden | 13 urban and rural abortion clinics in middle-third of Sweden | Facility-based | 2009 | Makenzius et al., Repeat induced abortion - a matter of individual behavior or societal factors? A cross-sectional study among Swedish Women, The European Journal of Contraception and Reproductive Health Care, 2011, 16:369–377 |
United States | 11 abortion providers | Facility-based | 2004 | National Survey of Women |
United States | 30 abortion providers in 21 states | Facility-based | 2008–2010 | Biggs MA, Gould H, Foster DG. Understanding why women seek abortions in the US. BMC Women's Health. 2013; 13:29. |
Country and year of survey | Main reason category | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Wants to postpone/space childbearing | Wants no (more) children | Socioeconomic concerns | Partner-related reasons | Too young; parent(s) or other(s) object to pregnancy | Risk to maternal health | Risk to fetal health | Other | |
Armenia, 2010 | Spacing next pregnancy | Did not want (any more) children | Socioeconomic reasons | Partner did not want the child | - | Health of mother | Risk of birth defects | Sex selection (wanted a boy), sex selection (wanted a girl), other |
Azerbaijan, 2006 | Spacing next pregnancy | Did not want (any more) children | Socioeconomic reasons | Partner did not want the child | - | Health of mother | Risk of birth defects | Child's sex selection, other |
Belgium, 2011 | No desire for a child at the moment | Woman is too old, family complete | Student, financial problems, professional situation, housing problems | Recently broke up, partner did not want the child, casual relationship, new relationship, not married, couple problems, family/friends have problems with the relationship, divorce | Woman is too young | Health problems of mother, mental health problems | Health problems of unborn child | Rape, incest, political refugee, other |
Congo Republic, 2012 | Too short birth interval | Too old to have a child, has many children | Lack of money, to keep with schooling, to keep working | Husband/partner does not like to have any more children | Too young to have a child, fear of parents | Health problems | - | Other |
Gabon, 2012 | Too short birth interval | Too old to have a child, has many children | Lack of money, to keep with schooling, to keep working | Husband/partner does not want to have any more children | Too young to have a child, fear of parents | Health problems | - | Other |
Georgia, 2010 | Want to postpone childbearing | Want no (more) children | Socioeconomic reasons | Partner objected to pregnancy | - | Pregnancy was life or health threatening | Risk of birth defects | Other |
Ghana, 2007 | Wanted to delay childbearing, wanted to space childbearing | - | No money to take care of baby, wanted to continue schooling, wanted to continue working | Did not love the father, did not want to stay w/the father, partner did not want child/denied paternity, father of child died | Too young to have child, not ready to be a mother, to avoid shame, afraid of parents, parents insisted | Health of mother | Risk of birth defect | Because of rape, no one to help me look after the child, other |
Jamaica, 2002 | - | Respondent did not want (any) children | Could not afford to have another child | Partner did not want (any) children, did not have a partner | - | Pregnancy was life threatening | Risk of birth defects | Don't know, other |
Kyrgyz Republic, 2012 | Spacing next pregnancy | Respondent did not want (any more) children | Socioeconomic reasons | Partner did not want child, not married | - | Health of mother | Risk of birth defect | Sex selection/wanted boy, sex selection/wanted girl, other |
Nepal, 2011 | Wanted to delay childbearing, wanted to space child | Did not want (any more) children | No money to take care of baby, wanted to continue schooling, wanted to continue working | Did not love the father, partner did not want child, father of child died | Too young to have a child, not ready to be a mother | Health of mother | Risk of birth defect | Child's sex, b/c of rape, to avoid shame, no one to look after child, other |
Russia, 2011 | Birth spacing | She did not want another child | Could not afford another child | Partner opposed to another child | - | Health reasons | - | Other |
Turkey, 2003 | Just delivered/had little child | Like to limit, has enough children, woman too old | Economic problems (lack of money, unemployment), economic and other problems, she is working/nobody to look after the child | Husband was in the army/was abroad, husband does not want it, problems within the family/planning to divorce, husband too old/disabled, not married | - | Health problem - woman, health problem - woman and fetus | Health problem - fetus, usage of medicine during pregnancy | Does not want the child/too early for a child, problems w/pregnancy (probability of spontaneous abortion), unwanted pregnancy, unintended pregnancy, IUD failure, not able to take care of children (unspecified), other |
United States, 2004 | Not ready for a(nother) child, timing is wrong | Have completed my childbearing, have other people/children depending on me, children are grown | Can't afford a baby now; unemployed; can't afford basic needs of life; can't leave job to take care of baby; would have to find a new place to live; not enough financial support from partner; partner unemployed; on welfare; would interfere w/education or career plans; I'm a student or planning to study | Don't want to be single mother, am having relationship problems, husband or partner wants me to have an abortion, partner abusive | Don't feel mature enough to raise a(nother) child, feel too young, parents want me to have an abortion | Physical problem w/my health | Possible problems affecting the health of the fetus | Was a victim of rape, don't want people to know I had sex or got pregnant, other |
References
- Induced abortion and effecting factors of ever married women in the southeast Anatolian project region, Turkey: a cross sectional study.BMC Public Health. 2004; 4: 65
- Knowledge about complications and practice of abortion among female undergraduates in the university of Ibadan, Nigeria.Ann Ib Postgrad Med. 2011; 9: 19-23
- Unsafe induced abortions among adolescent girls in Lusaka.Health Care Women Int. 2007; 28: 654-676
- Social and psychological consequences of abortion in Iran.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012; 118: S172-7
- Reasons, methods used and decision-making for pregnancy termination among adolescents and older women in Mulago hospital, Uganda.East Afr Med J. 2005; 82: 579-585
- Factors associated with induced abortion among women in Hohoe, Ghana.Afr J Reprod Health. 2010; 14: 110-116
- Reasons why women have induced abortions: evidence from 27 countries.Int Fam Plan Perspect. 1998; : 117-152
- Reasons women give for abortion: a review of the literature.Arch Womens Ment Health. 2009; 12: 365-378
- Second trimester abortions in India.Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16: 37-45
- Reasons for second trimester abortions in England and Wales.Reprod Health Matters. 2008; 16: 18-29
- Rapport bisannuel 2010-2011.2012
- Reasons U.S. women have abortions: quantitative and qualitative perspectives.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2005; 37: 110-118
- Understanding why women seek abortions in the US.BMC Womens Health. 2013; 13: 29
- Repeat induced abortion—a matter of individual behaviour or societal factors? A cross-sectional study among Swedish women.Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011; 16: 369-377
Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Turkey Demographic and Health Survey, 2003. Hacettepe University Institute of Population Studies, Ministry of Health General Directorate of Mother and Child Health and Family Planning, State Planning Organization and European Union. Ankara, Turkey.
- Reproductive Health Survey Jamaica 2002: Final report. Atlanta, GA and Kingston, Jamaica.2005
- Reproductive Health Survey Georgia 2010: Final Report.2012
- Characteristics of US abortion patients, 2008.Guttmacher Institute, New York2010: 20101-20108
- Characteristics of women obtaining induced abortions in selected low-and middle-income countries.PLoS One. 2017; 12e0172976
- Armenia Demographic and Health Survey 2010.ICF International, Yerevan, Armenia2012
Macro International, Inc., State Statistical Committee of Azerbaijan. Azerbaijan Demographic and Health Survey 2006. Baku, Azerbaijan: Macro International, Inc.
- Estimating induced abortion rates: a review.Stud Fam Plan. 2003; 34: 87-102
Article info
Publication history
Identification
Copyright
User license
Creative Commons Attribution – NonCommercial – NoDerivs (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) |
Permitted
For non-commercial purposes:
- Read, print & download
- Redistribute or republish the final article
- Text & data mine
- Translate the article (private use only, not for distribution)
- Reuse portions or extracts from the article in other works
Not Permitted
- Sell or re-use for commercial purposes
- Distribute translations or adaptations of the article
Elsevier's open access license policy