Advertisement

“The stakes are so high”: interviews with progressive journalists reporting on abortion

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Because news frames can influence public and policy agendas, proponents of abortion access should be concerned with how this issue is covered in the news. While previous research has examined the content of news on abortion, this analysis explores the process of newsmaking on abortion, examining how journalists understand their role in and experience of covering abortion.

      Study design

      We recruited journalists with experience reporting on abortion through listservs for progressive and feminist reporters. Thirty-one participants, with experiences at 75 diverse media outlets, completed in-depth, open-ended interviews. We used grounded theory to code interview transcripts in Dedoose to identity emergent themes.

      Results

      Journalists described many challenges that applied to reporting generally, but that they perceived to be more difficult around abortion: grappling with the meaning of “neutrality” on this issue, finding new angles for articles, and handling editors with varying knowledge of abortion. Over one-third (n=13) of participants mentioned feeling that the stakes were higher around abortion: this urgency and polarization left journalists frustrated by efforts to find new sources or angles on abortion stories. Finally, over 80% (n=28) of participants reported experiencing anti-abortion harassment as a result of their abortion work.

      Conclusions

      The difficulties journalists described when reporting on abortion were often rooted in abortion stigma and the political polarization around the issue. This pattern was true even for reporters who worked to counter abortion stigma through their reporting.

      Implications

      Advocates interested in accurate, destigmatizing news frames might work pro-actively to educate editors and increase reporters' access to providers, patients, and advocates.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rogers E.
        • Dearing J.
        • Bregman D.
        The anatomy of agenda-setting research.
        J Commun. 1993; 43: 68-84
        • McCombs M.
        Building consensus: the news media's agenda-setting roles.
        Pol Commun. 1997; 14: 433-443
        • McCombs M.
        • Shaw D.
        The agenda-setting function of mass media.
        Public Opin Q. 1972; 36: 176-187
        • Scheufele D.
        • Tewksbury D.
        Framing, agenda setting, and priming: the evolution of three media effects models.
        J Commun. 2007; 57: 9-20
        • Entman R.
        Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm.
        J Commun. 1993; 43: 51-58
        • Iyengar S.
        Is anyone responsible?.
        University of Chicago Press, Chicago1991
        • Condit C.
        Decoding abortion rhetoric: Communicating social change.
        University of Illinois Press, Chicago1990
        • Patterson M.
        • Hall M.
        Abortion, moral maturity, and civic journalism.
        Crit Stud Media Comm. 1998; 15: 91-115
        • Carmines E.
        • Gerrity J.
        • Wagner M.
        How abortion became a partisan issue: media coverage of the interest group-political party connection.
        Polit Policy. 2010; 38: 1135-1158
        • Rohlinger D.
        • Klein J.
        Visual landscapes and the abortion issue.
        Am Behav Sci. 2012; 56: 172-188
        • Husting G.
        When a war is not a war: abortion, desert storm, and representations of protest in American TV news.
        Sociol Q. 1999; 40: 159-178
        • Cannon C.
        Abortion: journalism's sacred cow. Real clear politics.
        (Available:)
        • Ginn J.
        Journalists struggle with three conflicts when covering abortion politics.
        Bioethics Forum. 1994; : 13-16
        • Shaw D.
        Abortion bias seeps into news. Los Angeles times.
        (Available:)
        http://www.latimes.com/food/la-me-shaw01jul01-story.html
        Date: 1990
        Date accessed: October 8, 2016
        • Parker K.
        Media, darlings, your abortion bias is showing again.
        Hum Life Rev. 2003; 29: 90-91
        • Maza C.
        Abortion stigma is ruining good abortion journalism. Media matters.
        (Available:)
        • Knight N.
        How authorities, media are abortion shaming an Arizona woman. Rewire.
        (Available:)
        • Purcell C.
        • Hilton S.
        • McDaid L.
        The stigmatisation of abortion: a qualitative analysis of print media in great Britain in 2010.
        Cult Health Sex. 2014; 16: 1141-1155
        • Miller D.
        A matter of consequence: Abortion rhetoric and media messages.
        in: Parrott R. Condit C. Evaluating women's health messages: A resource book. SAGE, Thousand Oaks1996
        • Kumar A.
        • Hessini L.
        • Mitchell E.
        Conceptualising abortion stigma.
        Cult Health Sex. 2009; 11: 625-639
        • Norris A.
        • Bessett D.
        • Steinberg J.R.
        • Kavanaugh M.L.
        • DeZordo S.
        • Becker D.
        Abortion stigma: areconceptualization of constituents, causes, and consequences.
        J Womens Health Issues. 2011; 21: S49-S54
        • Reinardy S.
        Need for speed onto internet clashes with journalistic values.
        Newsp Res J. 2010; 31: 69-83
        • Fisher M.
        Who cares if it's true? Modern-day newsrooms reconsider their values. Columbia journalism review.
        (Available:)
        http://archives.cjr.org/cover_story/who_cares_if_its_true.php
        Date: 2014
        Date accessed: December 11, 2016
        • Pew Research Center Journalism
        • Media Staff
        The changing newsroom. Pew research center.
        (Available:)
        http://www.journalism.org/2008/07/21/the-changing-newsroom/
        Date: 2008
        Date accessed: December 11, 2016
        • Mitchell A.
        • Holcomb J.
        State of the news media 2016. Pew research Center's journalism project.
        (Available:)
        • Women's Media Center
        The status of women in US media 2017. Women's media center.
        (Available:)
        • Solomon E.
        How freelance journalists can help shape journalism education.
        J Mass Commun Educ. 2016; 71: 241-247
        • Holton A.
        Intrapreneurial informants.
        J Pract. 2016; 10: 917-927
        • Charmaz K.
        Constructing grounded theory.
        SAGE, London2006
        • Kovach B.
        • Rosentiel T.
        The elements of journalism: What newspeople should know and the public should expect.
        Three Rivers Press, New York2007
        • Bryant A.
        • Levi E.
        Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 752-756
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Narasimhan S.
        • Bryant-Comstock K.
        • Levi E.
        Crisis pregnancy center websites: information, misinformation, and disinformation.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 601-605
        • Littman L.
        • Jacobs A.
        • Negron R.
        • Shochet T.
        • Gold M.
        • Cremer M.
        Beliefs about abortion risks in women returning to the clinic after their abortions: a pilot study.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 19-22
        • Kavanaugh M.
        • Bessett D.
        • Littman L.
        • Norris A.
        Connecting knowledge about abortion and sexual reproductive health to belief about abortion restrictions: findings from an online survey.
        J Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23: 239-247
        • Bessett D.
        • et al.
        Does state-leve context matter for individuals' knowledge about abortion, legality and health? Challenging the ‘red states v. Blue states’ hypothesis.
        Cult Health Sex. 2015; 17: 733-746
        • Cohen D.
        • Connon K.
        Living in the crosshairs: The untold stories of anti-abortion terrorism.
        Oxford University Press, New York2015
        • Duffy M.
        • Thorson E.
        • Vultee F.
        All communications is persuasive: Exploding the myth of objectivity.
        in: Duffy M. Thorson E. Persuasion ethics today. Routledge, New York2016
        • Judis J.
        Glenn Greenwald and bill Keller are wrong about objectivity in journalism. New Republic.
        (Available:)
        • Keller B.
        Is Glenn Greenwald the future of news? The New York times.
        (Available:)
        • Lanosga G.
        • et al.
        A breed apart? A comparative study of investigative journalists and US journalists.
        J Stud. 2015; 18: 265-287
        • Volz Y.
        • Lee F.
        What does it take for women journalists to gain professional recognition? Gender disparities among Pulitzer prize winners, 1917-2010.
        J Mass Commun Q. 2013; 90: 248-266
        • Barton A.
        • Storm H.
        Violence and harassment against women in the news media: a global picture. Women's media foundation and the international news safety institute.
        (Available:)
        • Scheufele D.
        Framing as a theory of media effects.
        J Commun. 1999; 49: 103-122
        • Goffman E.
        Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience.
        Northeastern University Press, Boston1986
        • Shaw E.
        Agenda-setting and mass communication theory.
        Int Commun Gaz. 1979; 25: 96-105
        • Iyengar S.
        • Kinder D.R.
        News that matters: Television and American opinion.
        2nd edition. University of Chicago Press, Chicago2010