Original research article| Volume 98, ISSUE 1, P69-73, July 2018

Download started.


The prevalence and impacts of crisis pregnancy center visits among a population of pregnant women



      Investigations into Crisis Pregnancy Centers (CPCs) have documented the provision of deceptive information about abortion, but it is unclear how many pregnant women actually visit CPCs and what impact visits have on their pregnancy decision-making.

      Study design

      We conducted a mixed-methods study. We surveyed patients at one of two local abortion clinics and three prenatal clinics in Southern Louisiana about whether they had visited a CPC for this pregnancy and conducted in-depth interviews with prenatal patients who reported a CPC visit about their experience.


      We surveyed 114 abortion patients and 269 prenatal patients, and interviewed 12 prenatal patients about their CPC visit. Just 6% of abortion patients (n=7) and 5% of prenatal patients (n=14) visited a CPC for this pregnancy. Prenatal patients went to CPCs primarily for free pregnancy tests and reported receiving information about abortion from CPC staff that was inaccurate. They also generally recognized the CPC was antiabortion, ideologically Christian, and not a medical establishment. Only three had been considering abortion at the time of their visit and reported that the visit impacted their plan for the pregnancy. However, all three also faced additional barriers to abortion, including inability to find an abortion provider, difficulty securing funding, gestational limits, ambivalence about choosing abortion, and opposition to abortion from family members.


      We do not find evidence that pregnant women regularly seek CPC services or that CPCs persuade women who are certain abortion is the right decision for them to continue their pregnancies.


      Given little evidence that CPCs impact pregnant women's decision-making on a broad scale, future research should examine other aspects of CPCs, such as their role in the antiabortion movement and/or the impact of CPC visits on maternal health and birth outcomes among women who continue their pregnancies.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Kelly K.
        In the name of the mother: renegotiating conservative women's authority in the crisis pregnancy center movement.
        Signs. 2012; 38: 203-230
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Levi E.E.
        Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 752-756
        • Bryant A.G.
        • Narasimhan S.
        • Bryant-Comstock K.
        • Levi E.E.
        Crisis pregnancy center websites: information, misinformation, and disinformation.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 601-605
        • LaRoche K.J.
        • Foster A.M.
        Toll free but not judgment free: evaluating postabortion support services in Ontario.
        Contraception. 2015; 92: 469-474
        • Kelly K.
        The spread of ‘post abortion syndrome’ as social diagnosis.
        Soc Sci Med. 2014; 102: 18-25
        • Daniels J
        From Crisis Pregnancy Centers to Anti-abortion Activism's Use of Cloaked Websites.
        in: McCaughey M. Cyberactivism on the Participatory Web. Routledge, New York2014: 140-154
      1. NARAL Pro-Choice America. Crisis Pregnancy Centers Lie: The Insidious Threat to Reproductive Freedom,; 2015 [accessed 16 December 2015].

        • Ahmed A.
        Informed decision making and abortion: crisis pregnancy centers, informed consent, and the first amendment.
        J Law Med Ethics. 2015; 43: 51-58
        • Rosen J.D.
        The public health risks of crisis pregnancy centers.
        Perspect Sex Repro H. 2012; 44: 201-205
      2. National Abortion Federation. Crisis Pregnancy Centers: An Affront to Choice, 2006,; 2006 [accessed 27 October 2017].

      3. United States House of Representatives Committee on Government Reform - Minority Staff Special Investigations Division. False and Misleading Health Information Provided by Federally Funded Pregnancy Resource Centers,; 2006 [accessed 16 March 2016].

        • Kimport K.
        • Dockray J.P.
        • Dodson S.
        What women seek from a pregnancy resource center.
        Contraception. 2016; 94: 168-172
        • Fonow M.M.
        • Cook J.A.
        Feminist methodology: new applications in the academy and public policy.
        Signs. 2005; 30: 2211-2236
        • Kelly K.
        Evangelical underdogs, intrinsic success, organizational solidarity, and marginalized identities as religious movement resources.
        J Contemp Ethnogr. 2014; 43: 419-455
        • Hussey L.S.
        Political action versus personal action Understanding Social Movements' Pursuit of Change Through Nongovernmental Channels.
        Am Polit Res. 2013; 42: 409-440
        • Hussey L.S.
        Crisis pregnancy centers, poverty, and the expanding frontiers of american abortion politics.
        Polit Policy. 2013; 41: 985-1011
        • Haugeberg K.
        Women against abortion: inside the largest moral reform movement of the twentieth century.
        University of Illinois Press, Chicago2017
        • Munson Z.W.
        The making of pro-life activists: how social movement mobilization works.
        University of Chicago Press, Chicago2008