Advertisement

The intrauterine device as emergency contraception: how much do young women know?

      Abstract

      Background

      Unprotected intercourse is common, especially among teens and young women. Access to intrauterine device (IUD) as emergency contraception (EC) can help interested patients more effectively prevent unintended pregnancy and can also offer ongoing contraception. This study evaluated young women's awareness of IUD as EC and interest in case of need.

      Study design

      We conducted a secondary analysis of data from young women aged 18–25 years, not desiring pregnancy within 12 months, and receiving contraceptive counseling within a cluster-randomized trial in 40 US Planned Parenthood health centers in 2011–2013 (n=1500). Heath centers were randomized to receive enhanced training on contraceptive counseling and IUD placement, or to provide standard care. The intervention did not focus specifically on IUD as EC. We assessed awareness of IUD as EC, desire to learn more about EC and most trusted source of information of EC among women in both intervention and control groups completing baseline and 3- or 6-month follow-up questionnaires (n=1138).

      Results

      At follow-up, very few young women overall (7.5%) visiting health centers had heard of IUD as EC. However, if they needed EC, most (68%) reported that they would want to learn about IUDs in addition to EC pills, especially those who would be very unhappy to become pregnant (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.0–1.6, p<.05). Most (91%) reported a doctor or nurse as their most trusted source of EC information, over Internet (6%) or friends (2%), highlighting providers' essential role.

      Conclusion

      Most young women at risk of unintended pregnancy are not aware of IUD as EC and look to their providers for trusted information. Contraceptive education should explicitly address IUD as EC.

      Implications

      Few young women know that the IUD can be used for EC or about its effectiveness. However, if they needed EC, most reported that they would want to learn about IUDs in addition to EC pills, especially those very unhappy to become pregnant. Contraceptive education should explicitly address IUD as EC.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Finer L.B.
        • Zolna M.R.
        Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 843-852
        • Turok D.K.
        • Jacobson J.C.
        • Dermish A.I.
        • Simonsen S.E.
        • Gurtcheff S.
        • McFadden S.M.
        • et al.
        Emergency contraception with a copper IUD or oral levonorgestrel: an observational study of 1-year pregnancy rates.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 222-228
        • Abma J.C.
        • Martinez G.M.
        Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers in the US, 2011–2015.
        Ntl Health Stat Rep. 2017; 104
        • Ahern R.
        • Frattarelli L.
        • Delto J.
        • Kaneshiro B.
        Knowledge and awareness of emergency contraception in adolescents.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010; 23: 273-278
        • Yen S.
        • Parmar D.
        • Lin E.
        • Ammerman S.
        Emergency contraception pill awareness and knowledge in uninsured adolescents: high rates of misconceptions concerning indications for use, side effects, and access.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2015; 28: 337-342
        • Fleming K.L.
        • Sokoloff A.
        • Raine T.R.
        Attitudes and beliefs about the intrauterine device among teenagers and young women.
        Contraception. 2010; 82: 178-82.12
        • Whitaker A.K.
        • Johnson L.M.
        • Harwood B.
        • Chiappetta L.
        • Creinin M.D.
        • Gold M.A.
        Adolescent and young adult women's knowledge of and attitudes toward the intrauterine device.
        Contraception. 2008; 78: 211-217
        • Cleland K.
        • Zhu H.
        • Goldstuck N.
        • Cheng L.
        • Trussell J.
        The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.
        Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 1994-2000
        • Cheng L.
        • Che Y.
        • Gulmezoglu A.M.
        Interventions for emergency contraception.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; 15
        • Glasier A.
        • Cameron S.T.
        • Blithe D.
        • Scherrer B.
        • Mathe H.
        • Levy D.
        • et al.
        Can we identify women at risk of pregnancy despite using emergency contraception? Data from randomized trials of ulipristal acetate and levonorgestrel.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: 363
        • Harper C.C.
        • Speidel J.J.
        • Drey E.A.
        • Trussell J.
        • Blum M.
        • Darney P.D.
        Copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception: clinical practice among contraceptive providers.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 220-226
        • Luchowski A.T.
        • Anderson B.L.
        • Power M.L.
        • Raglan G.B.
        • Espey E.
        • Schulkin J.
        Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 572-577
        • Batur P.
        • Cleland K.
        • McNamara M.
        • Wu J.
        • Pickle S.
        • EC Survey Group
        Emergency contraception: a multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices.
        Contraception. 2016; 93: 145-15
        • Schubert F.D.
        • Bisop E.S.
        • Gold M.
        Access to the copper IUD as post-coital contraception: results from a mystery caller study.
        Contraception. 2016; 94: 561-566
        • Edwards C.
        • Panjwani D.
        • Pendrith C.
        • Ly A.
        • Dunn S.
        Knowledge of and interest in the copper intrauterine device among women seeking emergency contraception.
        J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2017; 40 ([pii: S1701–2163(17)30441–3]): 41-47
        • Turok D.K.
        • Gurtcheff S.E.
        • Handley E.
        • Simonsen S.E.
        • Sok C.
        • North R.
        • et al.
        A survey of women obtaining emergency contraception: are they interested in using copper IUD?.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 441-446
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Kavanaugh M.
        • Douglas E.
        • Dubowitz T.
        • Creinin M.D.
        Interest in intrauterine contraception among seekers of emergency contraception and pregnancy testing.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2009; 113: 833-839
        • Harper C.C.
        • Rocca C.H.
        • Thompson K.M.
        • Morfesis J.
        • Goodman S.
        • Darney P.D.
        • et al.
        Reductions in pregnancy rates in the USA with long-acting reversible contraception: a cluster randomised trial.
        Lancet. 2015; 386: 562-568
        • Raine T.R.
        • Ricciotti N.
        • Sokoloff A.
        • Brown B.A.
        • Hummel A.
        • Harper C.C.
        An over-the-counter simulation study of a single tablet emergency contraceptive in young females.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 119: 1-8
        • Royer P.A.
        • Turok D.K.
        • Sanders J.N.
        • Saltzman H.M.
        Choice of emergency contraceptive and decision making regarding subsequent unintended pregnancy.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2016; 25: 1038-1043
        • Envall N.
        • Groes Kofoed N.
        • Kopp-Kallner H.
        Use of effective contraception 6 months after emergency contraception with a copper intrauterine device or ulipristal acetate—a prospective observational cohort study.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2016; 95: 887-893
      1. ACOG Practice Bulletin, Number 152. 2015 ([Emergency Contraception])
      2. MMWR Recomm Rep. 2016; 65: 1-66
        • Clement K.M.
        • Mansour D.J.
        Improving uptake of the copper intrauterine device for emergency contraception by educating pharmacists in the community.
        J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014; 40: 41-45
        • Kohn J.E.
        • Nucatola D.L.
        EC4U: results from a pilot project integrating the copper IUC into emergency contraceptive care.
        Contraception. 2016; 94: 48-51
      3. EC4U Toolkit. Planned Parenthood Federation of America, 2014
        • Turok D.K.
        • Sanders J.N.
        • Thompson I.S.
        • Royer P.A.
        • Eggebroten J.
        • Gawron L.M.
        Preference for and efficacy of oral levonorgestrel for emergency contraception with concomitant placement of a levonorgestrel IUD: a prospective cohort study.
        Contraception. 2016; 93: 526-532
        • Sanders J.N.
        • Turok D.K.
        • Royer P.A.
        • Thompson I.S.
        • Gawron L.M.
        • Storck K.E.
        One-year continuation of copper or levonorgestrel intrauterine devices initiated at the time of emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 2017; 96: 99-105
        • Jackson A.V.
        • Karasek D.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Foster D.G.
        Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods.
        Contraception. 2016; 93: 406-411
        • Donnelly K.Z.
        • Foster T.C.
        • Thompson R.
        What matters most? The content and concordance of patients' and providers' information priorities for contraceptive decision making.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 280-287
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Henderson J.T.
        • Vittinghoff E.
        • Grumbach K.
        • Levy K.
        • Schmittdiel J.
        • et al.
        Association of the quality of interpersonal care during family planning counseling with contraceptive use.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 215: 78.e1-78.e9
        • Lessard L.N.
        • Karasek D.
        • Ma S.
        • Darney P.D.
        • Deardorff J.
        • Lahiff M.
        • et al.
        Contraceptive features preferred by women at high risk of unintended pregnancy.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 194-200
        • Amico J.R.
        • Bennett A.H.
        • Karasz A.
        • Gold M.
        “I wish they could hold on a little longer”: physicians' experiences with requests for early IUD removal.
        Contraception. 2017; 96: 106-110
        • Foster D.G.
        • Grossman D.
        • Turok D.K.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Prine L.
        • Schreiber C.A.
        • et al.
        Interest in and experience with IUD self-removal.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 54-59
        • Planned Parenthood Federation of America
        PPFA Annual Report 2015–2016.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Krajewski C.
        • Borrero S.
        Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 57: 659-673