Advertisement

Women's decision making for postpartum sterilization: does the Medicaid waiting period add value?

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Currently, patients with federally funded insurance are required to sign a sterilization consent form (SCF) at least 30 days prior to sterilization, while privately insured patients are not. Although this policy was designed to protect the reproductive rights of vulnerable populations, it has had the unintended effect of creating a disparity in access to an effective contraceptive method. Our qualitative study aims to clarify the decision-making process surrounding postpartum sterilization and assess if patients perceive that the SCF adds value.

      Study design

      We interviewed 25 women who underwent postpartum sterilization procedures, 10 with private insurance and 15 with Medicaid. Topics discussed included reproductive history, reason for choosing sterilization, decision-making timeline and value of the SCF. We transcribed and coded the interviews and identified themes.

      Results

      Participant responses indicated that decision-making processes were similar between patients with private insurance and those with Medicaid. For most women, the decision to undergo sterilization took place over the course of their reproductive lives. Participants expressed that nonbiased provider counseling, autonomy and information from other women were helpful to their decision making. Most subjects felt that the SCF might benefit other women but did not/would not affect their own decision making.

      Conclusions

      We did not find evidence suggesting that women with private insurance and women with Medicaid should be subjected to disparate restrictions on sterilization based on differences in decision-making processes. Characteristics of the decision-making process that women value, which in this population did not include the SCF, should be prioritized.

      Implications

      Given the potential negative consequences associated with the SCF including its disproportionate burden on women of low socioeconomic status, the lack of value added to the decision-making process for postpartum sterilization reported by our participants provides further evidence for reevaluation of the policy.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Daniels K.
        • Mosher W.D.
        Contraceptive methods women have ever used: United States, 1982–2010.
        Natl Health Stat Report. 2013; : 1-15
        • Daniels K.
        • Daugherty J.
        • Jones J.
        • Mosher W.
        Current contraceptive use and variation by selected characteristics among women aged 15–44: United States, 2011–2013.
        Natl Health Stat Report. 2015; 86: 1-14
        • Brown B.P.
        • Chor J.
        Adding injury to injury: ethical implications of the Medicaid sterilization consent regulations.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 1348-1351https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000265
        • ACOG
        Committee on Health Care for Underserved Women. Committee opinion no. 530: access to postpartum sterilization.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 120: 212-215https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318262e354
        • Raine S.P.
        Federal sterilization policy: unintended consequences.
        Virtual Mentor. 2012; 14: 152-157https://doi.org/10.1001/virtualmentor.2012.14.2.mhst1-1202
        • Stern A.M.
        Sterilized in the name of public health: race, immigration, and reproductive control in modern California.
        Am J Public Health. 2005; 95: 1128-1138https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2004.041608
        • Zite N.
        • Wuellner S.
        • Gilliam M.
        Barriers to obtaining a desired postpartum tubal sterilization.
        Contraception. 2006; 73 ([doi:S0010-7824(05)00432-4 [pii]): 404-407
        • Borrero S.
        • Zite N.
        • Potter J.E.
        • Trussell J.
        Medicaid policy on sterilization—anachronistic or still relevant?.
        N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 102-104https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1313325
        • Thurman A.R.
        • Janecek T.
        One-year follow-up of women with unfulfilled postpartum sterilization requests.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 116: 1071-1077https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181f73eaa
        • Wolfe K.K.
        • Wilson M.D.
        • Hou M.Y.
        • Creinin M.D.
        An updated assessment of postpartum sterilization fulfillment after vaginal delivery.
        Contraception. 2017; 96: 41-46https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.05.005
        • Gilliam M.
        • Davis S.D.
        • Berlin A.
        • Zite N.B.
        A qualitative study of barriers to postpartum sterilization and women's attitudes toward unfulfilled sterilization requests.
        Contraception. 2008; 77 ([doi:S0010-7824(07)00427-1 [pii]): 44-49
        • Zite N.B.
        • Philipson S.J.
        • Wallace L.S.
        Consent to sterilization section of the Medicaid-title XIX form: is it understandable?.
        Contraception. 2007; 75: 256-260https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.12.015
        • The Kaiser Family Foundation State Health Facts
        Data Sources: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Vital Statistics Reports (NVSR), Vol 66, No 1: Births: Final Data for 2015. Births financed by Medicaid.
        • ACOG
        Sterilization of women: ethical issues and considerations committee on ethics.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 775https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002023