Original research article| Volume 99, ISSUE 1, P22-26, January 2019

Beyond intent: exploring the association of contraceptive choice with questions about Pregnancy Attitudes, Timing and How important is pregnancy prevention (PATH) questions



      To explore women's responses to PATH questions (Pregnancy Attitudes, Timing and How important is pregnancy prevention) about hypothetical pregnancies and associations with contraceptive method selection among individuals who present as new contraceptive clients and desire to prevent pregnancy for at least 1 year.

      Study design

      The HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative provided no-cost contraception to new contraceptive clients for 1 year at family planning health centers in Salt Lake County. Those who wanted to avoid pregnancy for at least 1 year and completed the enrollment survey are included in the current study. We used Poisson regression to explore the association between survey-adapted PATH questions and contraceptive method selection.


      Based on an analytic sample of 3121 individuals, we found pregnancy timing and happiness about hypothetical pregnancies to be associated with method selection. Clients who report plans to wait more than 5 years [prevalence rate (PR) 1.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.05–1.24], those who never wanted to become pregnant (PR 1.16; 95% CI 1.07–1.26) or those who were uncertain (PR=1.19; 95% CI 1.09–1.30) were all more likely to select IUDs and implants than women who reported wanting to become pregnant within 5 years. Greater happiness was associated with lower chance of choosing an IUD or implant (PR 0.98; 95% CI 0.96–0.999). Expressed importance of pregnancy prevention was not significantly associated with any specific contraceptive choice.


      Pregnancy intentions and happiness about a hypothetical pregnancy were independently associated with selection of IUDs and implants.


      Pregnancy attitudes, plans and emotions inform clients' contraceptive needs and behaviors. Client-centered contraceptive care may benefit from a more nuanced PATH approach rather than relying on a single time-oriented question about pregnancy intention.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Bachrach C.A.
        • Newcomer S.
        Intended pregnancies and unintended pregnancies: distinct categories or opposite ends of a continuum?.
        Fam Plann Perspect. 1999; 31: 251-252
        • Jones R.K.
        Change and consistency in US women's pregnancy attitudes and associations with contraceptive use.
        Contraception. 2017; 95: 485-490
        • Aiken A.R.
        • Borrero S.
        • Callegari L.S.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        Rethinking the pregnancy planning paradigm: unintended conceptions or unrepresentative concepts?.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016; 48: 147
        • Bellanca H.K.
        • Hunter M.S.
        ONE KEY QUESTION: preventive reproductive health is part of high quality primary care.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 3-6
        • Callegari L.S.
        • Aiken A.R.
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Cason P.
        • Borrero S.
        Addressing potential pitfalls of reproductive life planning with patient-centered counseling.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 216: 129-134
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Popkin R.A.
        • Santelli J.S.
        Pregnancy ambivalence and contraceptive use among young adults in the United States.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 236-243
        • Schwarz E.B.
        • Lohr P.A.
        • Gold M.A.
        • Gerbert B.
        Prevalence and correlates of ambivalence towards pregnancy among nonpregnant women.
        Contraception. 2007; 75: 305-310
        • Jones R.K.
        • Tapales A.
        • Lindberg L.D.
        • Frost J.
        Using longitudinal data to understand changes in consistent contraceptive use.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015; 47: 131-139
        • Higgins J.A.
        • Hirsch J.S.
        • Trussell J.
        Pleasure, prophylaxis and procreation: a qualitative analysis of intermittent contraceptive use and unintended pregnancy.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2008; 40: 130-137
        • Zabin L.S.
        Ambivalent feelings about parenthood may lead to inconsistent contraceptive use--and pregnancy.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 1999; 31: 250
        • Frost J.J.
        • Singh S.
        • Finer L.B.
        Factors associated with contraceptive use and nonuse, United States, 2004.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007; 39: 90-99
        • Aiken A.R.
        • Dillaway C.
        • Mevs-Korff N.
        A blessing I can't afford: factors underlying the paradox of happiness about unintended pregnancy.
        Soc Sci Med. 2015; 132: 149-155
        • Secura G.M.
        • Allsworth J.E.
        • Madden T.
        • Mullersman J.L.
        • Peipert J.F.
        The Contraceptive CHOICE Project: reducing barriers to long-acting reversible contraception.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 203 ([e1-. e7]): 115
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Grumbach K.
        • Schmittdiel J.A.
        • Steinauer J.
        Shared decision making in contraceptive counseling.
        Contraception. 2017; 95: 452-455
        • Sanders J.N.
        • Myers K.
        • Gawron L.M.
        • Simmons R.G.
        • Turok D.K.
        Contraceptive method use during the community-wide HER salt lake contraceptive initiative.
        Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: 550-556
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Krajewski C.
        • Borrero S.
        Contraceptive counseling: best practices to ensure quality communication and enable effective contraceptive use.
        Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 57: 659
        • Aiken A.R.
        • Potter J.E.
        Are Latina women ambivalent about pregnancies they are trying to prevent? Evidence from the Border Contraceptive Access Study.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013; 45: 196-203
        • Higgins J.A.
        Pregnancy ambivalence and long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) use among young adult women: a qualitative study.
        Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health. 2017; 49: 149-156

      Linked Article