Original article| Volume 99, ISSUE 6, P363-367, June 2019

Download started.


Access to contraception in local health departments, four Midwest states, 2017–2018



      Describe contraception availability at local health departments (LHDs) serving largely rural populations.

      Study design

      We invited administrators at LHDs located in four Midwest states to participate in an online survey conducted from September 2017–April 2018. We collected data on clinic staffing, patient population, receipt of Title X funds, and services provided to assess the proportion of LHDs providing any prescription method of contraception; secondary outcomes included healthcare staff training level and other reproductive health services provided.


      Of 344 LHDs invited, 237 administrators completed the survey (68.9%). Three-quarters served rural populations. One-third (34.6%) provided short-acting hormonal contraception; however, availability varied by state (Kansas: 58.0%, 40/69; Missouri: 37.5%, 33/88; Nebraska: 16.7%, 3/18; Iowa: 9.7%, 6/62; p<.01). Only 8.4% of LHDs provided IUDs; 7.6% provided implants, and 5.9% provided both methods. LHDs in Nebraska and Kansas provided any long-acting method more frequently (Kansas: 17.4%, Nebraska: 16.7%, Iowa: 8.1%, Missouri: 4.6%; p=.04). LHDs receiving Title X funds (27.0%) were much more likely to provide any prescription contraception (85.1% vs. 14.2%, p<.01). Most LHDs relied on registered nurses (RNs) to provide medical care; 81.0% reported that RNs provided care≥20 days per month. Pregnancy testing was widely available in Missouri and Kansas (>87%) and less commonly available in Iowa and Nebraska (<18%) (p<.01).


      LHDs in these states are currently ill-equipped to offer comprehensive contraceptive services. Women seeking care at LHDs have limited, if any, contraceptive options.


      Local health departments in the Midwest, serving a largely rural population, rarely offer prescription contraception, especially long-acting reversible methods. Women residing in settings without broad access to publicly-funded healthcare providers may have limited access to comprehensive contraceptive services. Efforts to ensure rural access are needed.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        Access to contraception. Committee opinion no. 615.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 250-255
        • Pace L.E.
        • Dusetzina S.B.
        • Keating N.L.
        Early impact of the affordable care act on uptake of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
        Med Care. 2016; 54: 811-817
        • Ricketts S.
        • Klingler G.
        • Schwalberg R.
        Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014; 46: 125-132
        • Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment
        Taking the unintended out of pregnancy: Colorado's success with long-acting reversible contraception, January 2017.
        • Sanders J.N.
        • Myers K.
        • Gawron L.M.
        • Simmons R.G.
        • Turok D.K.
        Contraceptive method use during the community-wide HER salt Lake contraceptive initiative.
        Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: 550-556
        • Allison M.
        • Musser B.
        • Satterwhite C.
        • Ault K.
        • Kelly P.
        • Ramaswamy M.
        Human papillomavirus vaccine knowledge and intention among adult inmates in Kansas, 2016-2017.
        Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: 1000-1002
        • Kansas Department of Health and Environmental Resources
        Bureau of Community Health Systems, Kansas Public Health Directory.
        • Iowa Department of Public Health
        • Bureau of Local Public Health Services
        • County Public Health Contacts
        • Missouri Department of Health & Senior Services Local Public Health Agencies
        • Department of Health & Human Services Nebraska Health Departments
        • Harris P.A.
        • Taylor R.
        • Thielke R.
        • Payne J.
        • Gonzalez N.
        • Conde J.G.
        Research electronic data capture (REDCap) – a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.
        J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381
        • National Association of County & City Health Officials
        2016 National Profile of Local Health Departments.
        • Office of Population Affairs
        Title X Family Planning Directory, September 2017.
        • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
        Providing quality family planning services: Recommendations of CDC and the U.S. Office of Population Affairs.
        MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014; 63: 1-29
        • Gunter J.
        • Hurd G.M.
        • Wedel S.
        • Weller T.
        Kansas statistical abstract 2017.
        University of Kansas Institute for policy and Social Research
        Date: 2018
        • Beeson T.
        • Wood S.
        • Bruen B.
        • Goetz Goldberg D.
        • Mead H.
        • Rosenbaum S.
        Accessibility of long-acting reversible contraceptives (LARCs) in federally qualified health centers (FQHCs).
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 91-96
        • Bornstein M.
        • Carter M.
        • Zapata L.
        • Gavin L.
        • Moskosky S.
        Access to long-acting reversible contraception among US publicly funded health centers.
        Contraception. 2018; 97: 405-410
        • Sonfield A.
        • Kost K.
        Public Costs from Unintended Pregnancies and the Role of Public Insurance Programs in Paying for Pregnancy-Related Care: National and State Estimates for 2010.
        • Cleland K.
        • Peipert J.F.
        • Westhoff C.
        • Spear S.
        • Trussell J.
        Family planning as a cost-saving preventive health service.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: e37
        • Frost J.J.
        • Sonfield A.
        • Zolna M.R.
        • Finer L.B.
        Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.
        Milbank Q. 2014; 92: 696-749
        • Trussell J.
        • Lalla A.M.
        • Doan Q.V.
        • Reyes E.
        • Pinto L.
        • Gricar J.
        Cost effectiveness of contraceptives in the United States.
        Contraception. 2009; 79: 5-14
        • Dehlendorf C.
        • Rodriguez M.I.
        • Levy K.
        • Borrero S.
        • Steinauer J.
        Disparities in family planning.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 202: 214-220
        • The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation
        Women's coverage, access, and affordability: Key findings from the 2017 Kaiser Women's health survey. Women's health policy.
      1. Power to Decide. Access to Birth Control.
        • DeSalvo K.B.
        • O'Carroll P.W.
        • Koo D.
        • Auerbach J.M.
        • Monroe J.A.
        Public health 3.0: time for an upgrade.
        Am J Public Health. 2016; 106: 621-622
        • Sobel L.
        • Rosenzweig C.
        • Salganicoff A.
        Proposed changes to title X: Implications for women and family planning providers.
      2. An overview of Minors' consent law. Guttmacher Institute, New York2018