Original Research Article| Volume 103, ISSUE 6, P408-413, June 2021

“It prevents a fertilized egg from attaching…and causes a miscarriage of the baby”: A qualitative assessment of how people understand the mechanism of action of emergency contraceptive pills



      The mechanism of action (MOA) of emergency contraceptive pills (ECPs) is frequently mischaracterized. Our objective was to identify how members of the general public understand the mechanisms of ECPs.

      Study design

      We recruited a convenience sample from social media for a survey about reproductive health attitudes and analyzed spontaneous descriptions of how ECPs work. We inductively coded responses to create themes and subthemes, and collapsed subthemes into three MOA categories based on previous research.


      Among 1443 respondents, 533 mentioned an MOA in their description of ECPs. While nearly half of these responses (49.5%) stated that ECPs prevent pregnancy before fertilization occurs (in accordance with most biomedical ECP research), over 60% described a mechanism related to preventing implantation of a fertilized egg. Nine percent of responses described a postimplantation mechanism that would be considered abortion by mainstream medical standards. Some respondents conveyed significant confusion about the biological processes involved with pregnancy and pregnancy prevention.


      Confusion about how ECPs work was common among our sample. The largest group of responses described a mechanism—preventing implantation of a fertilized egg—listed on the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved ECP labels that does not reflect most relevant biomedical research. Mischaracterizations of ECPs’ mechanisms have been used to limit access to EC. These misunderstandings were common in our sample and may reflect poor quality sex education and public information, and confusion introduced by the FDA-approved labels. Additional research should identify whether public perception of ECPs’ mechanisms influences policy, health care provision, and use of ECPs.


      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Cleland K
        • Zhu H
        • Goldstuck N
        • Cheng L
        • Trussell J.
        The efficacy of intrauterine devices for emergency contraception: a systematic review of 35 years of experience.
        Hum Reprod. 2012; 27: 1994-2000
        • Wynn L.L.
        • Trussell J
        The social life of emergency contraception in the United States: disciplining pharmaceutical use, disciplining sexuality, and constructing zygotic bodies.
        Med Anthropol Q. 2006; 20: 297-320
        • ChoGlueck C.
        Broadening the scope of our understanding of mechanisms: lessons from the history of the morning-after pill.
        Synthese. 2019;
        • Foundation Consumer Healthcare
        Plan B One-Step Drug Facts.
        • HRA Pharma America, Inc.
        Ella (Ulipristal Acetate) Prescribing Information.
      1. CFR - Code of Federal Regulations Title 21 n.d. Available at: CFRPart=201&showFR=1 (Accessed November 7, 2020).

        • Novikova N
        • Weisberg E
        • Stanczyk FZ
        • Croxatto HB
        • Fraser IS.
        Effectiveness of levonorgestrel emergency contraception given before or after ovulation—a pilot study.
        Contraception. 2007; 75: 112-118
        • Noe G
        • Croxatto HB
        • Maria Salvatierra A
        • Reyes V
        • Villarroel C
        • Munoz C
        • et al.
        Contraceptive efficacy of emergency contraception with levonorgestrel given before or after ovulation.
        Contraception. 2011; 84: 486-492
        • Brache V
        • Cochon L
        • Jesam C
        • Maldonado R
        • Salvatierra AM
        • Levy DP
        • et al.
        Immediate pre-ovulatory administration of 30 mg ulipristal acetate significantly delays follicular rupture.
        Hum Reprod. 2010; 25: 2256-2263
        • Li HWR
        • Lo SST
        • Ng EHY
        • Ho PC
        Efficacy of ulipristal acetate for emergency contraception and its effect on the subsequent bleeding pattern when administered before or after ovulation.
        Hum Reprod. 2016; 31: 1200-1207
        • Li HWR
        • Resche-Rigon M
        • Bagchi IC
        • Gemzell-Danielsson K
        • Glasier A.
        Does ulipristal acetate emergency contraception (ella®) interfere with implantation?.
        Contraception. 2019; 100: 386-390
        • Kahlenborn C
        • Peck R
        • Severs WB.
        Mechanism of action of levonorgestrel emergency contraception.
        Linacre Q. 2015; 82: 18-33
        • Mozzanega B
        • Nardelli GB.
        UPA and LNG in emergency contraception: the information by EMA and the scientific evidences indicate a prevalent anti-implantation effect.
        Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2019; 24: 4-10
        • Keenan JA.
        Ulipristal acetate: contraceptive or contragestive?.
        Ann Pharmacother. 2011; 45: 813-815
        • ACOG
        Committee opinion no 579: definition of term pregnancy.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 122: 1139-1140
        • OPRR
        Reports: protection of human subjects.
        Code of Federal Regulations 45CFR. 46. 1983
        • Card RF.
        Conscientious objection and emergency contraception.
        Am J Bioeth. 2007; 7: 8-14
        • Cleland K
        • Wagner B
        • Batur P
        • McNamara M
        • Wu J
        • Rothberg MB.
        The politics of place: presidential voting patterns and providers’ prescription of emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 2018; 98: 237-242
        • Yang C.
        The inequity of conscientious objection: refusal of emergency contraception.
        Nurs Ethics. 2020; 27: 1-10
        • Batur P.
        Emergency contraception: separating fact from fiction.
        Cleve Clin J Med. 2012; 79: 771-776
        • Miller LM.
        College student knowledge and attitudes toward emergency contraception.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 68-73
        • Garrett Wagner KP
        • Widman L
        • Nesi J
        • Noar SM
        Intentions to use emergency contraception: the role of accurate knowledge and information source credibility.
        Am J Health Educ. 2018; 49: 264-270
        • Hickey MT.
        Female college students’ knowledge, perceptions, and use of emergency contraception.
        J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2009; 38: 399-405
        • Richman AR
        • Daley EM
        • Baldwin J
        • Kromrey J
        • O'Rourke K
        • Perrin K
        The role of pharmacists and emergency contraception: are pharmacists’ perceptions of emergency contraception predictive of their dispensing practices?.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 370-375
        • Ahern R
        • Frattarelli LA
        • Delto J
        • Kaneshiro B.
        Knowledge and awareness of emergency contraception in adolescents.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2010; 23: 273-278
        • Mooney-Somers J
        • Lau A
        • Bateson D
        • Richters J
        • Stewart M
        • Black K
        • et al.
        Enhancing use of emergency contraceptive pills: a systematic review of women's attitudes, beliefs, knowledge, and experiences in Australia.
        Health Care Women Int. 2019; 40: 174-195
        • Heller C
        • Perreira KM
        • Shartzer A
        • Johnston EM
        • Courtot B.
        Emergency contraception use: the influence of awareness, attitudes, and beliefs among non-Hispanic white, non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic women in the United States.
        Womens Health Issues. 2019; 29: 161-169
        • Braun V
        • Clarke V.
        Using thematic analysis in psychology.
        Qual Research Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101
        • Batur P
        • Cleland K
        • McNamara M
        • Wu J
        • Pickle S
        • EC Survey Group
        Emergency contraception: a multispecialty survey of clinician knowledge and practices.
        Contraception. 2016; 93: 145-152
        • Shigesato M
        • Elia J
        • Tschann M
        • Bullock H
        • Salcedo J.
        Pharmacy access to the emergency contraceptive ulipristal acetate in major cities throughout the United States.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2017; 30: 283
        • Willetts SJ
        • MacDougall M
        • Cameron ST
        A survey regarding acceptability of oral emergency contraception according to the posited mechanism of action.
        Contraception. 2017; 96: 81-88
        • Perreault W.D.
        • Leigh L.E.
        Reliability of nominal data based on qualitative judgments.
        J Market Res. 1989; 26: 135-148
        • Banerjee M
        • Capozzoli M
        • McSweeney L
        • Sinha D.
        Beyond Kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures.
        Can J Stat. 1999; 27: 3-23
        • Lindberg LD
        • Maddow-Zimet I
        • Boonstra H.
        Changes in adolescents’ receipt of sex education, 2006-2013.
        J Adolesc Health. 2016; 58: 621-627
        • Wynn LL
        • Foster AM
        • Trussell J.
        Can I get pregnant from oral sex? Sexual health misconceptions in e-mails to a reproductive health website.
        Contraception. 2009; 79: 91-97
        • Guzzo KB
        • Hayford SR.
        Adolescent reproductive and contraceptive knowledge and attitudes and adult contraceptive behavior.
        Matern Child Health J. 2018; 22: 32-41
        • Buhi ER
        • Daley EM
        • Oberne A
        • Smith SA
        • Schneider T
        • Fuhrmann HJ.
        Quality and accuracy of sexual health information web sites visited by young people.
        J Adol Health. 2010; 47: 206-208
        • Buhi ER
        • Daley EM
        • Fuhrmann HJ
        • Smith SA.
        An observational study of how young people search for online sexual health information.
        J Am Coll Health. 2009; 58: 101-111
      2. Laboratoire HRA Pharma. NorLevo 1.5mg Patient Information Leaflet, 2017. (accessed Decmber 18, 2020).

      3. Laboratoire HRA Pharma. EllaOne Package Leaflet. (accessed Decmber 18, 2020).

      4. Supreme Court of the United States. Burwell, Secretary of Health and Human Services et al. v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc., et al. 2014;13-354:1-95.

      5. (Supreme Court of the United States). Little Sisters of the Poor Saints Peter and Paul Home v Pennsylvania et al. 2020;19-431:1-78.

        • Charo RA.
        The Supreme Court decision in the Hobby Lobby Case: conscience, complicity, and contraception.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2014; 174: 1537-1538