Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Contraception
Frontline Physicians Call on Politicians to End Political Interference in the Delivery of Evidence Based Medicine. American Academy of Family Phyicians n.d. https://www.aafp.org/media-center/releases-statements/all/2019/physicians-call-on-politicians-to-end-political-interference-in-the-delivery-of-evidence-based-medicine.html (accessed November 22, 2019).
AMA lawsuit to protect patient-physician relationship in North Dakota. Am Med Assoc n.d. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-lawsuit-protect-patient-physician-relationship-north-dakota (accessed November 22, 2019).
AMA opposes proposed rule on Title X family planning program. Am Med Assoc n.d. https://www.ama-assn.org/press-center/press-releases/ama-opposes-proposed-rule-title-x-family-planning-program(accessed November 22, 2019).
- Abortion rights in peril — What clinicians need to know.N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 497-499https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1906972
- Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 49: 17-27https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12015
State Abortion Policy Landscape: From Hostile to Supportive. Guttmacher Inst 2018. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/08/state-abortion-policy-landscape-hostile-supportive (accessed September 17, 2020).
Abortion. vol. § 940.04. 1849.
Abortion Policy in the Absence of Roe. Guttmacher Inst 2016. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/abortion-policy-absence-roe (accessed September 17, 2020).
State facts about abortion: wisconsin. Guttmacher Institute; 2019. https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/state-facts-about-abortion-wisconsin [accessed May 27, 2021].
- Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2017.Guttmacher Institute, 2019 (https://www.guttmacher.org/report/abortion-incidence-service-availability-us-2017 [accessed May 27, 2021])
- Trusted colleagues or incompetent hacks? Development of the attitudes about abortion-providing physicians scale.Womens Health Issues. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.09.002
- The importance of physician concern and expertise in increasing abortion health care access in local contexts.Am J Public Health. 2020; : e1-e4https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2020.305997
- Attitudes toward Abortion among Providers of Reproductive Health Care.Womens Health Issues. 2016; 26: 511-516https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.06.005
- Contraception and abortion coverage: what do primary care physicians think?.Contraception. 2012; 86: 153-156https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.11.069
- Estimating abortion provision and abortion referrals among United States obstetrician-gynecologists in private practice.Contraception. 2018; 97: 297-302https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.11.004
- Abortion provision among practicing Obstetrician–Gynecologists.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 609-614https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822ad973
- She's on her own”: a thematic analysis of clinicians’ comments on abortion referral.Contraception. 2017; 95: 470-476https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.01.007
- Pregnancy options counseling and abortion referrals among US primary care physicians.Fam Med. 2017; : 10
- Medical students’ intentions to seek abortion training and to provide abortion services in future practice.J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015; 37: 236-244https://doi.org/10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30309-1
- Abortion providers, professional identity, and restrictive laws: a qualitative study.Health Care Women Int. 2017; 38: 222-237https://doi.org/10.1080/07399332.2016.1254218
- Obstacles to the integration of abortion into obstetrics and gynecology practice.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2010; 42: 146-151https://doi.org/10.1363/4214610
- Staff Perspectives. Abort. Care.Cambridge University Press, 2014: 211-218 (Ed Sam Rowlands)
- Distinctiveness and influence of subjective norms, personal descriptive and injunctive norms, and societal descriptive and injunctive norms on behavioral intent: a case of two behaviors critical to organ donation.Hum Commun Res. 2007; 33: 194-218https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.2007.00296.x
- Separating subjective norms, university descriptive and injunctive norms, and U.S. descriptive and injunctive norms for drinking behavior intentions.Health Commun. 2009; 24: 746-751https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230903265912
- The impact of pluralistic ignorance on the provision of health care for people who inject drugs.J Health Psychol. 2015; 20: 1240-1249https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105313510336
Rathbone JA, Cruwys T, Jetten J, Barlow FK.When stigma is the norm: how weight and social norms influence the healthcare we receive. J Appl Soc Psycholn.d.;n/a. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12689.
- Obstetrician–Gynecologists’ objections to and willingness to help patients obtain an abortion.Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118: 905-912https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31822f12b7
- Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.Eval Health Prof. 2013; 36: 352-381https://doi.org/10.1177/0163278713496630
- Medical students for choice's reproductive health externships: impact on medical students’ knowledge, attitudes and intention to provide abortions.Contraception. 2008; 78: 31-35https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2008.02.008
- Abortion providers, stigma and professional quality of life.Contraception. 2014; 90: 581-587https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.011
- Values clarification workshops to improve abortion knowledge, attitudes and intentions: a pre-post assessment in 12 countries.Reprod Health. 2018; 15: 40https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-018-0480-0