Advertisement

Who attends a crisis pregnancy center in Ohio?

      Abstract

      Objectives

      We sought to quantify the prevalence of ever attendance at a crisis pregnancy center (CPC) among adult, reproductive-age women in Ohio and identify demographic factors associated with ever attendance.

      Study Design

      We analyzed data from the Ohio Survey of Women, a survey of adult, reproductive-age women (N = 2529) conducted in 2018 to 2019. We calculated unadjusted and adjusted prevalence ratios (PRs) to evaluate the possible associations between demographic factors and ever CPC attendance. Analyses used statistical weights to be population-representative.

      Results

      Analyses are based on women reporting ever (n = 291) or never CPC attendance (n = 2151). Prevalence of ever CPC attendance was 13.5%. Ever CPC attendance was higher among women of Black, non-Hispanic race/ethnicity (adjusted PR, 2.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.4–3.2) and currently in the lowest socioeconomic status (SES) stratum (defined as less than a college degree and annual household income less than $75,000) (aPR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1–2.3) compared to those of other race/ethnicity and in the highest SES stratum.

      Conclusions

      Disparities exist among adult women in Ohio regarding their ever use of CPCs. Because CPCs typically are not medical facilities and may provide inaccurate information, future studies should evaluate a wider range of correlates of recent CPC attendance.

      Implications

      Findings from a population-based survey of adult, reproductive-age women in Ohio indicate that ever attendance to a CPC for pregnancy-related care is not rare, and this attendance is higher among Black/non-Hispanic women and those of low SES compared to other women.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shah JS
        • Revere FL
        • Toy EC.
        Improving rates of early entry prenatal care in an underserved population.
        Matern Child Health J. 2018; 22: 1738-1742
        • Downe S
        • Finlayson K
        • Tunçalp Ö
        • Gülmezoglu AM.
        Provision and uptake of routine antenatal services: a qualitative evidence synthesis.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 6CD012392
        • Dobkin LM
        • Perrucci AC
        • Dehlendorf C.
        Pregnancy options counseling for adolescents: overcoming barriers to care and preserving preference.
        Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care. 2013; 43: 96-102
      1. U.S. House of Representatives. Committee on Government Reform-Minority Staff. Special Investigations Division. False and misleading health information provided by federally-funded pregnancy resource centers. Available at: https://www.chsourcebook.com/articles/waxman2.pdf

      2. Swartzendruber A, Lambert D. Crisis pregnancy center map. 2018. Available at: https://crisispregnancycentermap.com

        • Kimport K
        • Kriz R
        • Roberts SCM.
        The prevalence and impacts of crisis pregnancy center visits among a population of pregnant women.
        Contraception. 2018; 98: 69-73
        • Bryant AG
        • Levi EE.
        Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.
        Contraception. 2012; 86: 752-756
        • Stotland NL.
        The myth of the abortion trauma syndrome.
        JAMA. 1992; 268: 2078-2079
        • Kelly K.
        The spread of 'Post Abortion Syndrome' as social diagnosis.
        Soc Sci Med. 2014; 102: 18-25
        • Rosen JD.
        The public health risks of crisis pregnancy centers.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2012; 44: 201-205
        • Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine
        Abstinence-only-until-marriage policies and programs: an updated position paper of the Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine.
        J Adolesc Health. 2017; 61: 400-403
        • Swartzendruber A
        • Lambert DN.
        A web-based geolocated directory of crisis pregnancy centers (CPCs) in the United States: description of CPC map methods and design features and analysis of baseline data.
        JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2020; 6 (Ohio Revised Code. 5101.804 Ohio Parenting and Pregnancy Program. Available at) (Ohio House Bill 166): e16726
      3. Guttmacher, State Laws and Policies. ‘Choose life’ license plates. 2020. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/choose-life-license-plates

        • Lichter DT
        • Garratt J
        • Marshall ML
        • Cardella M.
        Emerging patterns of population redistribution and migration in Appalachia. Demographic and Socioeconomic Change in Appalachia.
        Population Reference Bureau and Appalachian Regional Commission, 2005
        • Song X
        • Massey CG
        • Rolf KA
        • Ferrie JP
        • Rothbaum JL
        • Xie Y.
        Long-term decline in intergenerational mobility in the United States since the 1850s.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2020; 117: 251-258
        • Hout M.
        Americans' occupational status reflects the status of both of their parents.
        Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2018; 115: 9527-9532
      4. Newport F. Five key findings on religion in the U.S. 2016. Available at: https://news.gallup.com/poll/200186/five-key-findings-religion.aspx

      5. Delaware Contraceptive Access Now. Evaluation of the Delaware contraceptive access now initiative. Available at: https://popcenter.umd.edu/delcaneval. Accessed April 29, 2020.

      6. U.S. Census Bureau; American Community Survey (ACS), Public Use Summary and Microdata Sample (PUMS), 2014, generated by Robin Rice; accessed via American Fact Finder; (27 June 2014).

        • Slaughter-Acey JC
        • Sneed D
        • Parker L
        • Keith VM
        • Lee NL
        • Misra DP.
        Skin tone matters: racial microaggressions and delayed prenatal care.
        Am J Prev Med. 2019; 57: 321-329
        • Gadson A
        • Akpovi E
        • Mehta PK.
        Exploring the social determinants of racial/ethnic disparities in prenatal care utilization and maternal outcome.
        Semin Perinatol. 2017; 41: 308-317
        • Andaya E.
        Race-ing time: clinical temporalities and inequality in public prenatal care.
        Med Anthropol. 2019; 38: 651-663
        • Heaman MI
        • Sword W
        • Elliott L
        • Moffatt M
        • Helewa ME
        • Morris H
        • et al.
        Barriers and facilitators related to use of prenatal care by inner-city women: perceptions of health care providers.
        BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015; 15: 2
        • Foster DG
        • Biggs MA
        • Ralph L
        • Gerdts C
        • Roberts S
        • Glymour MM.
        Socioeconomic outcomes of women who receive and women who are denied wanted abortions in the United States.
        Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: 407-413
      7. Ohio Revised Code (ORC) Sec 2317.56(B)2b and ORC Section 2317.56(C)1. Available at https://codes.ohio.gov/ohio-revised-code/section-2317.56.

      8. Guttmacher, Misinformed consent: the medical accuracy of state-developed abortion counseling materials. Guttmacher 2006. Available at: https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2006/10/misinformed-consent-medical-accuracy-state-developed-abortion-counseling-materials#.

      9. Guttmacher, Misinformed Consent: The medical accuracy of state-developed abortion counseling materials. Guttmacher 2006. Available at https://www.guttmacher.org/gpr/2006/10/misinformed-consent-medical-accuracy-state-developed-abortion-counseling-materials#.