Advertisement
Original Research Article| Volume 104, ISSUE 4, P401-405, October 2021

The emergency contraceptive pill in Brazil: High usage rates but schooling differences persist

      Abstract

      Objectives

      This paper aims to analyze usage rates for the emergency contraceptive pill (ECP) among women living in the city of São Paulo and their associated factors.

      Study design

      A population based cross-sectional survey was conducted in 2015 with a probabilistic sample of 4,000 women aged 15 to 44 living in São Paulo, Brazil. Response rate for households was 75% and 77% for eligible women. Binary logistic regression models were used to describe the association between each outcome and selected variables.

      Results

      A total of 51.4% of women living in the city of São Paulo had used ECP at least once in their lifetime. Women under 35 were more likely to use ECP, as were those with more than 9 years of schooling, having at least one live birth, not cohabiting with a partner, with more than two lifetime sexual partners and as length of sexual life decreased. Among ECP users, 32.6% used it only once, 47.5% used it 2 to 4 times, and 19.9% used it 5 or more times.

      Conclusions

      Our findings suggest that ECPs have been incorporated into the contraceptive method mix for many women as a fundamental strategy for regulating fertility. Particularly young women, unmarried women and those who have had more partners seem to take greater advantage of ECP to prevent pregnancy.

      Implications

      Despite the high use rate, lower levels of schooling are associated with lower levels of ECP use. There is a need for both policies to reduce schooling inequities and strategies to improve women's knowledge of reproduction and contraception.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Brasil. Pesquisa Nacional de Demografia e Saúde da Criança e da Mulher – PNDS 2006: Brasília: Ministério da Saúde/Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos/Departamento de Ciência e Tecnologia; 2008. (Report).

        • Prietsch SOM
        • Gonzalez-Chica DA
        • Cesar JA
        • Mendoza-Sassi RA.
        Unplanned pregnancy in Southern Brazil: prevalence and associated factors.
        Cad Saude Publica. 2011; 27 (https://doi:10.1590/0102-311x00188214): 1906-1916
        • Theme-Filha MM
        • Baldisserotto ML
        • Fraga ACSA
        • Ayers S
        • Gama SGN
        • Leal MC.
        Factors associated with unintended pregnancy in Brazil: cross-sectional results from the Birth in Brazil National Survey, 2011/2012.
        Reprod Health. 2016; 13 (https://doi:10.1186/s12978-016-0227-8): 118
        • Vieira CS
        • Braga GC
        • Lugarinho PTC
        • Stifani BM
        • Bettiol H
        • Barbieri MA
        • et al.
        Sociodemographic factors and prenatal care behaviors associated with unplanned pregnancy in a Brazilian birth cohort study.
        Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 151 (https://doi:10.1002/ijgo.13305): 237-243
        • Arilha M
        • Citelli MT.
        Intervenções restritivas ao acesso da contracepção de emergência no Brasil (1999-2009).
        um mapa geopolítico das barreiras aos direitos reprodutivos no país. In: Berquó E. organizadora. Demografia na Unicamp: um olhar sobre a produção do Nepo. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp. 2017: 51-79
        • Arilha M
        • Lapa TS
        • Pisaneschi TC.
        Contracepção de emergência no Brasil e América Latina: dinâmicas políticas e direitos sexuais e reprodutivos.
        Oficina Editorial, São Paulo2010
        • Brandão ER.
        O atendimento farmacêutico às consumidoras da contracepção de emergência.
        Saúde Soc. 2017; 26 (https://doi:10.1590/S0104-12902017000003): 1122-1135
        • Chofakian CBN
        • Borges ALV
        • Sato APS
        • Alencar GP
        • Santos OA
        • Fujimori E.
        Does the knowledge of emergency contraception affect its use among high school adolescents?.
        Cad Saude Publica. 2016; 32 (https://doi:10.1590/0102-311x00188214)
        • Chofakian C
        • Moreau C
        • Borges ALV
        • Santos OA.
        Contraceptive discontinuation and its relation to emergency contraception use among undergraduate women in Brazil.
        Sex Reprod Healthc. 2019; 21 (https://doi:10.1016/j.srhc.2019.06.008): 81-86
        • Figueiredo R
        • Borges ALV
        • Paula SHB.
        Panorama da contracepção de emergência no Brasil.
        Instituto de Saúde, São Paulo2016
      2. SEC – Sociedad Española de Contracepción. La Encuesta Nacional 2018 sobre la Anticoncepción en España. Espanha; 2018. Available from: http://sec.es/presentada-la-encuesta-nacional-2018-sobre-la-anticoncepcion-en-espana [Accessed 4 April 2021].

      3. CDC. Key statistics from the national survey of family growth. National Center for Health Statistics; 2017. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/key_statistics/e.htm#emergency. [Accessed 19 Jun 2020]

        • Han L
        • Saavedra-Avendano B
        • Fu R
        • Rodriguez MI
        • Edelman A
        • Darney B.
        Emergency contraception in Mexico: trends in knowledge and ever-use 2006-2014.
        Matern Child Health J. 2017; 21 (https://doi:10.1007/s10995-017-2328-6): 2132-2139
      4. Arilha M, Yazaki L. Contracepção de emergência em tempos de ZIKA: entre cenários passados e desafios futuros. In: VII Congreso de la Asociación Latinoamericana de Población e XX Encontro Nacional de Estudos Populacionais; 17/10/2016 a 22/10/2016.

        • Lago TG
        • Kalckmann S
        • Alves MCGP
        • Escuder MML
        • Koyama M
        • Barbosa RM.
        Differences in contraceptive practice in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil: results of the Ouvindo Mulheres population survey.
        Cad Saude Publica. 2020; 36 (https://doi:10.1590/0102-311x00096919)e00096919
      5. ABEP. Critério de Classificação Econômica Brasil. 2013. Available from: http://www.abep.org/criterio-brasil [accessed 14 Oct 2016].

        • Richters J
        • Fitzadam S
        • Yeung A
        • Caruana T
        • Rissel C
        • Simpson J M
        Contraceptive practices among women: the second Australian study of health and relationships.
        Contraception. 2016; 94 (https://doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2016.06.016): 548-555
        • Moreau C
        • Bouyer J
        • Goulard H
        • Bajos N
        The remaining barriers to the use of emergency contraception: perception of pregnancy risk by women undergoing induced abortions.
        Contraception. 2005; 71 (https://doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2004.09.004): 202-207
        • Daniels K
        • Jones J
        • Abma J.
        Use of emergency contraception among women aged 15-44: United States, 2006-2010.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2013; : 1-8
        • Black KI
        • Geary R
        • French R
        • Leefe N
        • Mercer CH
        • Glasier A
        • et al.
        Trends in the use of emergency contraception in Britain: evidence from the second and third National Surveys of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles.
        BJOG. 2016; 123 (https://doi:10.1111/1471-0528.14131): 1600-1607
        • Coutinho RZ
        • Golgher AB
        Modelling the proximate determinants of fertility for Brazil: the advent of competing preferences.
        Rev Bras Estud Popul. 2018; 35 (https://doi:10.20947/S0102-3098a0041): e0041
        • Guleria S
        • Thomsen LT
        • Munk C
        • Nygård M
        • Hansen BT
        • Elfström KM
        • et al.
        Contraceptive use at first intercourse is associated with subsequent sexual behaviors.
        Contraception. 2019; 99 (https://doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2018.12.006): 217-221
        • Cavazos-Rehg PA
        • Krauss MJ
        • Spitznagel EL
        • Schootman M
        • Peipert JF
        • Cottler LB
        • et al.
        Type of contraception method used at last intercourse and associations with health risk behaviors among US adolescents.
        Contraception. 2010; 82 (https://doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2010.05.007): 549-555
        • Goulard H
        • Moreau C
        • Gilbert F
        • Job-Spira N
        • Bajos N
        • Group Cocon
        Contraceptive failures and determinants of emergency contraception use.
        Contraception. 2006; 74 (https://doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.007): 208-213
        • Whittaker PG
        • Berger M
        • Armstrong KA
        • Felice TL
        • Adams J.
        Characteristics associated with emergency contraception use by family planning patients: a prospective cohort study.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2007; 39 (https://doi:10.1363/3915807): 158-166
        • Guleria S
        • Munk C
        • Elfström K.M
        • Hansen BT
        • Sundström K
        • Liaw KL
        • et al.
        Emergency contraceptive pill use among women in Denmark, Norway and Sweden: Population-based survey.
        Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2020; 99 (https://doi:10.1111/aogs.13849): 1214-1221
        • Feleke AE
        • Nigussie TS
        • Debele TZ.
        Utilization and associated factors of emergency contraception among women seeking abortion services in health institutions of Dessie town.
        BMC Res Notes 2019. 2018; 12: 684
        • C Heller
        • KM Perreira
        • A Shartzer
        • EM Johnston
        • Emergency Courtot B.
        contraception use: the influence of awareness, attitudes, and beliefs among non-hispanic white, non-hispanic black, and hispanic women in the United States.
        Women's Health Issues. 2019; 29 (https://doi:10.1016/j.whi.2019.01.003): 161-169