Advertisement

Differences in abortion-related knowledge among women involved in the criminal legal system in three US cities

      Abstract

      Objective

      We examined if abortion-related knowledge among women with criminal legal system involvement differed in three U.S. cities in states with varying abortion policies.

      Study Design

      Respondents were self-identified women with criminal legal system involvement. Data come from a cross-sectional baseline survey of 381 women in three U.S. cities: Oakland, California, Kansas City, Kansas/Missouri, and Birmingham, Alabama. The primary outcome, high abortion-related knowledge, was based on a 10-item scale dichotomized into low vs high abortion-related knowledge. We used descriptive statistics, bivariable associations, and logistic regression to assess the association between high abortion-related knowledge, city of residence, and other possible related factors.

      Results

      Respondents in Kansas City, KS/MO and Birmingham, AL had lower odds of high abortion-related knowledge compared to respondents in Oakland, CA (OR: 0.19, 95% CI: 0.10–0.38 and OR: 0.17, 95% CI: 0.11–0.28, respectively). In adjusted analysis, the association remained after controlling for race/ethnicity, insurance status, and community supervision past year.

      Conclusions

      Findings underscore the need for communicating clear and accurate information about abortion care, especially in states where laws and ongoing political challenges make it difficult to access both reliable information and services.

      Implications

      Efforts to disseminate accurate information regarding abortion care, particularly among marginalized people, should utilize multiple venues in addition to traditional healthcare information sources. Reproductive justice advocates should connect with jails and probation offices to reach people with criminal legal system involvement and foster increased knowledge of reproductive rights and services.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Ramaswamy M
        • Kelly PJ.
        Sexual health risk and the movement of women between disadvantaged communities and local jails.
        Behav Med. 2015; 41: 115-122
        • Hayes CM
        • Sufrin C
        • Perritt JB.
        Reproductive justice disrupted: mass incarceration as a driver of reproductive oppression.
        American journal of public health. 2020; 110: S21-SS4
        • Lorvick J
        • Comfort M
        • Kral AH
        • Lambdin BH.
        Exploring lifetime accumulation of criminal justice involvement and associated health and social outcomes in a community-based sample of women who use drugs.
        J Urban Health. 2018; 95: 584-593
        • Binswanger IA
        • Krueger PM
        • Steiner JF.
        Prevalence of chronic medical conditions among jail and prison inmates in the USA compared with the general population.
        J Epidemiol & Community Health. 2009; 63: 912-919
        • Nowotny KM
        • Kuptsevych-Timmer A
        • Oser C.
        Criminal justice contact and health service utilization among women across health care settings: analyzing the role of arrest.
        Womens Health Issues. 2019; 29: 125-134
        • Puglisi LB
        • Shavit S.
        Health disparities of people living in the community on probation: a call to action for community and public health systems.
        Am J Public Health. 2020; 110: 1262-1263
        • Hawks L
        • Wang EA
        • Howell B
        • et al.
        Health status and health care utilization of US adults under probation: 2015-2018.
        Am J Public Health. 2020; 110: 1411-1417
        • Kaeble D
        • Alper M.
        Probation and parole in the United States, 2017–2018.
        Bureau of Justice Statistics. Bureau of Justice Statistics, Washington, DC2020 (https://www.bjs.gov/content/pub/pdf/ppus1718.pdf)
      1. Sawyer W, Wagner P. Mass Incarceration: The Whole Pie 2020. Prison policy initiative 2020. https://www.prisonpolicy.org/reports/pie2020.html (accessed 3/8/2021).

        • Lara D
        • Holt K
        • Pena M
        • Grossman D.
        Knowledge of abortion laws and services among low-income women in three United States Cities.
        J Immigr Minor Health. 2015; 17: 1811-1818
        • Hoff E
        • Adams ZM
        • Grimshaw A
        • et al.
        Reproductive life goals: a systematic review of pregnancy planning intentions, needs, and interventions among women involved in U.S. Criminal Justice Systems.
        J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2021; 30: 412-428
        • Dasgupta A
        • Davis A
        • Gilbert L
        • Goddard-Eckrich D
        • El-Bassel N.
        Reproductive health concerns among substance-using women in community corrections in new york city: understanding the role of environmental influences.
        J Urban Health. 2018; 95: 594-606
        • Sufrin CB
        • Creinin MD
        • Chang JC.
        Incarcerated women and abortion provision: a survey of correctional health providers.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2009; 41: 6-11
        • Ramaswamy M
        • Chen H-F
        • Cropsey KL
        • Clarke JG
        • Kelly PJ.
        Highly effective birth control use before and after women's incarceration.
        Journal of Women's Health. 2015; 24: 530-539
        • Larochelle F
        • Castro C
        • Goldenson J
        • et al.
        Contraceptive use and barriers to access among newly arrested women.
        J Correct Health Care. 2012; 18: 111-119
      2. State Legislation Tracker: Major Developments in Sexual & Reproductive Health. Guttmacher Institute n.d. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy (accessed 3/8/ 2021 ).

        • Boonstra HD.
        Insurance coverage of abortion: beyond the exceptions for life endangerment, rape and incest.
        Guttmacher Policy Review. 2013; 16: 2-8
        • Swartz JJ
        • Rowe C
        • Morse JE
        • Bryant AG
        • Stuart GS.
        Women’s knowledge of their state’s abortion regulations. a national survey.
        Contraception. 2020; 102: 318-326
      3. Nash E, Mohammed L, Cappello O, Naide S. State Policy Trends 2019: a wave of abortion bans, but some states are fighting back. guttmacher institute 2019. https://www.guttmacher.org/article/2019/12/state-policy-trends-2019-wave-abortion-bans-some-states-are-fighting-back (accessed 6/1/2021).

      4. Elliot D, Wamsley L. Alabama Governor Signs Abortion Ban Into Law. NPR 2019. https://www.npr.org/2019/05/14/723312937/alabama-lawmakers-passes-abortion-ban (accessed 6/1/2021).

      5. An Overview of Abortion Laws. Guttmacher Institute n.d. https://www.guttmacher.org/state-policy/explore/overview-abortion-laws# (accessed 5/1/ 2019 ).

      6. Vestal C. New laws deepen state differences over abortion. The pew charitable trusts 2019. https://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/blogs/stateline/2019/07/30/new-laws-deepen-state-differences-over-abortion (accessed 3/8/2021).

        • Emerson A
        • Lipnicky A
        • Comfort M
        • et al.
        Health and health service needs: comparison of older and younger women with criminal−legal involvement in three cities.
        Journal of Aging and Health. 2021; 008982643211025443
        • Hemberg J
        • Comfort M
        • Hall A
        • Lorvick J.
        Making research reachable: Engaging criminal justice involved women in community-based research.
        in: APHA's 2020 VIRTUAL Annual Meeting and Expo (Oct 24-28): American Public Health Association. 2020
        • Dodge LE
        • Haider S
        • Hacker MR.
        Knowledge of state-level abortion laws and regulations among reproductive health care providers.
        Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23: e281-e286
        • DeCoster J
        • Gallucci M
        • Iselin A-MR.
        Best practices for using median splits, artificial categorization, and their continuous alternatives.
        Journal of Experimental Psychopathology. 2011; 2: 197-209
        • Boyd RW
        • Lindo EG
        • Weeks LD
        • McLemore MR.
        On racism: a new standard for publishing on racial health inequities.
        Health Affairs Blog. 2020 (10(10.1377). https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20200630.939347/full/)
        • Kavanaugh ML
        • Bessett D
        • Littman LL
        • Norris A.
        Connecting knowledge about abortion and sexual and reproductive health to belief about abortion restrictions: findings from an online survey.
        Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23: e239-e247
        • Jones R
        • Witwer E
        • Jerman J
        Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2017.
        Guttmacher Institute, New York, NY2019 (In: Institute G, editor)
        • Bessett D
        • Gerdts C
        • Littman LL
        • Kavanaugh ML
        • Norris A.
        Does state-level context matter for individuals’ knowledge about abortion, legality and health? challenging the ‘red states v. blue states’ hypothesis.
        Cult Health Sex. 2015; 17: 733-746
        • Berglas NF
        • Gould H
        • Turok DK
        • Sanders JN
        • Perrucci AC
        • Roberts SC.
        State-mandated (mis)information and women’s endorsement of common abortion myths.
        Womens Health Issues. 2017; 27: 129-135
        • Gallo MF
        • Casterline JB
        • Chakraborty P
        • Norris A
        • Bessett D
        • Turner AN
        Passage of abortion ban and women's accurate understanding of abortion legality.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;
        • Rowlands S.
        Misinformation on abortion.
        Eur J Contracept Reprod Health Care. 2011; 16: 233-240
      7. Pilkington E. Indiana prosecuting Chinese woman for suicide attempt that killed her foetus. 2012. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/may/30/indiana-prosecuting-chinese-woman-suicide-foetus (accessed 6/1/2021).

      8. DeKok D. Pennsylvania mother who gave daughter abortion pill gets prison. Reuters 2014. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-crime-pennsylvania-abortion/pennsylvania-mother-who-gave-daughter-abortion-pill-gets-prison-idUSKBN0H10IR20140906 (accessed 6/1/2021).

        • Lorvick J
        • Hemberg J
        • Cropsey K
        • et al.
        Sources of information and health care experiences related to COVID-19 among women involved in criminal legal system in three U.S. Cities.
        Archives of Women Health and Care. 2020; 3: 1-5
        • Wildeman C
        • Wang EA.
        Mass incarceration, public health, and widening inequality in the USA.
        Lancet. 2017; 389: 1464-1474
        • Kajstura A.
        Women’s mass incarceration: the whole pie 2019.
        Prison Policy Initiative. 2019; (accessed 3/8/2021)
        • Binswanger IA
        • Redmond N
        • Steiner JF
        Hicks LS. Health disparities and the criminal justice system: an agenda for further research and action.
        J Urban Health. 2012; 89: 98-107
        • Knittel AK.
        Resolving health disparities for women involved in the criminal justice system.
        N C Med J. 2019; 80: 363-366