Abstract
Objective
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Implications
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ContraceptionReferences
- ACOG practice bulletin no. 186: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, D.C.2017
The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Private and public coverage of contraceptive services and supplies in the United States 2015.
- Long acting reversible contraception (LARC) learning community launch report.Arlington, VA2014
- Barriers to immediate post-placental intrauterine devices among attending level educators.Womens Health Issues. 2015; 25: 355-358https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.03.013
- Contraception after delivery among publicly insured women in Texas: use compared with preference.Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 393-402https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002136
- Patients’ experiences with South Carolina's immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception Medicaid policy.Contraception. 2019; 100: 165-171https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.007
- Medicaid managed care and the provision of family planning services.Kais Fam Found. 2017; 20: 1-20
- Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception.Contraception. 2015; 92: 523-531https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.014
Reimbursement methodology to change for LARC devices effective 2016.pdf n.d.
- Application of an implementation science framework to policies on immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception.Public Health Rep. 2019; 134: 189-196https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918824329
- Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
- Using a multi-state learning community as an implementation strategy for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception.Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 138https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0674-9
- Stage-based implementation of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception using a reproductive justice framework.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222: S893-S905https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1273
- Implementing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs.Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 3-9https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001798
- Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.Qual Health Res. 2000; 10: 378-395
- A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.Am J Eval. 2006; 27: 237-246https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
- Pleasure, power, and inequality: incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use.Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1803-1813https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.115790
- Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs in Texas hospitals following changes to Medicaid reimbursement policy.Matern Child Health J. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02763-y
- Beyond implementation: sustaining group prenatal care and group well-child care.J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020; (jmwh.13114)https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13114
- A mixed methods study of challenges in the implementation and use of the surgical safety checklist.Surgery. 2019; 165: 832-837https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.012
- What nurses need to know about immediate postpartum initiation of long-acting reversible contraception.Nurs Womens Health. 2017; 21: 186-195https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2017.04.003
- Under (implicit) pressure: Young Black and Latina women's perceptions of contraceptive care.Contraception. 2017; 96: 221-226https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.007
- Patients’ experiences with an immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception program.Womens Health Issues. 2021; 31 (Forthcoming): 131-170
- Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low-income minority women.J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011; 22: 1387-1400
- Beyond coercion: let us grapple with bias.Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 915-916
- The adoption of surgical innovations at academic versus nonacademic health centers.Acad Med. 2018; 93: 750-755https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001932
- Evaluation of the Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative: a qualitative analysis of site leaders’ implementation recommendations.Contraception. 2021; 104: 211-215https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.015
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Funding: This project was supported by a grant from the Susan Thompson Buffett Foundation (5123), and a center grant from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2C HD042849) awarded to the Population Research Center at The University of Texas at Austin. The funders played no role in the design and conduct of the study; interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of this manuscript for publication.