Advertisement
Original Research Article| Volume 108, P32-36, April 2022

Obtaining buy-in for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs in Texas hospitals: A qualitative study

      Abstract

      Objective

      To understand the specific ways in which champions lead efforts to obtain and sustain buy-in for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception (LARC) programs.

      Methods

      We conducted a qualitative study with 60 semistructured interviews at 3 teaching hospitals in Texas with physicians, nurses, administrators and other staff who participated in the implementation of immediate postpartum LARC. Physicians self-identified as champions and identified other champion physicians and administrators. Two researchers analyzed and coded interview transcripts for content and themes.

      Results

      We found that champions draw on institutional knowledge and relationships to build awareness and support for immediate postpartum LARC implementation. To obtain buy-in, champions needed to demonstrate financial sustainability, engage key stakeholders from multiple departments, and obtain nurse buy-in. Champions also created buy-in by communicating goals for the service that focused on expanding reproductive autonomy, improving maternal health, and improving access to postpartum contraception. Some staff, especially nurses, identified reasons for the program that run counter to reproductive justice principles: reducing birth rates, poverty, and/or unplanned pregnancy among young women and high-parity women. Respondents at 2 hospitals noted that not all women had equitable access to immediate postpartum LARC.

      Conclusion

      Physician and non-physician champions must secure long-term support across multiple hospital departments to successfully implement an immediate postpartum LARC program. For programs to equitably serve all women in need of postpartum contraceptive care, champions and other program leaders need to implement strategies to address access issues. They should also explicitly focus on reproductive justice principles during program introduction and training.

      Implications

      Successfully implementing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs requires champions with institutional networking connections, administrative and nursing support, and clearly communicated goals. Champions need to address access issues and focus on reproductive justice principles during program introduction and training to equitably serve all women in need of postpartum contraceptive care.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists
        ACOG practice bulletin no. 186: long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.
        American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Washington, D.C.2017
      1. The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. Private and public coverage of contraceptive services and supplies in the United States 2015.

        • Association of State and Territorial Health Officials
        Long acting reversible contraception (LARC) learning community launch report.
        Arlington, VA2014
        • Holland E
        • Michelis LD
        • Sonalkar S
        • Curry CL.
        Barriers to immediate post-placental intrauterine devices among attending level educators.
        Womens Health Issues. 2015; 25: 355-358https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.03.013
        • Potter JE
        • Coleman-Minahan K
        • White K
        • Powers DA
        • Dillaway C
        • Stevenson AJ
        • et al.
        Contraception after delivery among publicly insured women in Texas: use compared with preference.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 393-402https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002136
        • Mann ES
        • White AL
        • Rogers PL
        • Gomez AM.
        Patients’ experiences with South Carolina's immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception Medicaid policy.
        Contraception. 2019; 100: 165-171https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.007
        • Rosenzweig C
        • Sobel L
        • Salganicoff A.
        • Moore JE
        • Hernandez Gray AA
        Medicaid managed care and the provision of family planning services.
        Kais Fam Found. 2017; 20: 1-20
        • Moniz MH
        • Dalton VK
        • Davis MM
        • Forman J
        • Iott B
        • Landgraf J
        • et al.
        Characterization of Medicaid policy for immediate postpartum contraception.
        Contraception. 2015; 92: 523-531https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.09.014
      2. Reimbursement methodology to change for LARC devices effective 2016.pdf n.d.

        • DeSisto CL
        • Kroelinger CD
        • Estrich C
        • Velonis A
        • Uesugi K
        • Goodman DA
        • et al.
        Application of an implementation science framework to policies on immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception.
        Public Health Rep. 2019; 134: 189-196https://doi.org/10.1177/0033354918824329
        • Damschroder LJ
        • Aron DC
        • Keith RE
        • Kirsh SR
        • Alexander JA
        • Lowery JC.
        Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science.
        Implement Sci. 2009; 4: 50https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-4-50
        • DeSisto CL
        • Estrich C
        • Kroelinger CD
        • Goodman DA
        • Pliska E
        • Mackie CN
        • et al.
        Using a multi-state learning community as an implementation strategy for immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception.
        Implement Sci. 2017; 12: 138https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0674-9
        • Harper KD
        • Loper AC
        • Louison LM
        • Morse JE.
        Stage-based implementation of immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception using a reproductive justice framework.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222: S893-S905https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1273
        • Hofler LG
        • Cordes S
        • Cwiak CA
        • Goedken P
        • Jamieson DJ
        • Kottke M.
        Implementing immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 3-9https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001798
        • Angen MJ.
        Evaluating interpretive inquiry: reviewing the validity debate and opening the dialogue.
        Qual Health Res. 2000; 10: 378-395
        • Thomas DR.
        A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data.
        Am J Eval. 2006; 27: 237-246https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214005283748
        • Higgins JA
        • Hirsch JS.
        Pleasure, power, and inequality: incorporating sexuality into research on contraceptive use.
        Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1803-1813https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.115790
        • Hill AV
        • Nehme E
        • Elerian N
        • Puga ED
        • Taylor BD
        • Lakey D
        • et al.
        Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception programs in Texas hospitals following changes to Medicaid reimbursement policy.
        Matern Child Health J. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-019-02763-y
        • Novick G
        • Womack JA
        • Sadler LS.
        Beyond implementation: sustaining group prenatal care and group well-child care.
        J Midwifery Womens Health. 2020; (jmwh.13114)https://doi.org/10.1111/jmwh.13114
        • Mahmood T
        • Mylopoulos M
        • Bagli D
        • Damignani R
        • F Aminmohamed Haji
        A mixed methods study of challenges in the implementation and use of the surgical safety checklist.
        Surgery. 2019; 165: 832-837https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2018.09.012
        • Dole DM
        • Martin J.
        What nurses need to know about immediate postpartum initiation of long-acting reversible contraception.
        Nurs Womens Health. 2017; 21: 186-195https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nwh.2017.04.003
        • Gomez AM
        • Wapman M.
        Under (implicit) pressure: Young Black and Latina women's perceptions of contraceptive care.
        Contraception. 2017; 96: 221-226https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.007
        • Wallace Huff C
        • Potter JE
        • Hopkins K
        Patients’ experiences with an immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception program.
        Womens Health Issues. 2021; 31 (Forthcoming): 131-170
        • Yee LM
        • Simon MA.
        Perceptions of coercion, discrimination and other negative experiences in postpartum contraceptive counseling for low-income minority women.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2011; 22: 1387-1400
        • Gilliam ML.
        Beyond coercion: let us grapple with bias.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 915-916
        • Yeo HL
        • Kaushal R
        • Kern LM.
        The adoption of surgical innovations at academic versus nonacademic health centers.
        Acad Med. 2018; 93: 750-755https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000001932
        • Skračić I
        • Lewin AB
        • Roy KM.
        Evaluation of the Delaware Contraceptive Access Now (DelCAN) initiative: a qualitative analysis of site leaders’ implementation recommendations.
        Contraception. 2021; 104: 211-215https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.015