Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:Subscribe to Contraception
- Bigger and bigger: the growth of Catholic health systems.Community Catalyst. 2020;
United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services 2018 [Available from: https://www.usccb.org/about/doctrine/ethical-and-religious-directives/upload/ethical-religious-directives-catholic-health-service-sixth-edition-2016-06.pdf.
- “Am I going to be in trouble for what I’m doing?”: providing contraceptive care in religious health care systems.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019; 51: 193-199https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12125
- “My hands are tied”: abortion restrictions and providers’ experiences in religious and nonreligious health care systems.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020; 52: 107-115https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12148
- Tubal ligation in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of ob-gyns’ experiences.Contraception. 2014; 90: 422-428https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.016
- “Without bodily autonomy we are not free”: exploring women’s concerns about future access to contraception following the 2016 US presidential election.Contraception. 2017; 96: 370-377https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.169
- Safety of the etonogestrel-releasing implant during the immediate postpartum period: a pilot study.Contraception. 2009; 80: 519-526https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2009.05.124
- Contraception after delivery and short interpregnancy intervals among women in the United States.Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 125: 1471-1477https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.00000000000000841
- Association of short interpregnancy interval with pregnancy outcomes according to maternal age.JAMA Intern Med. 2018; 178: 1661-1670https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.4696
- Effect of the interval between pregnancies on perinatal outcomes.N Engl J Med. 1999; 340: 589-594https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199902253400801
- Interpregnancy care. Obstetric Care Consensus No. 8.Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: e51-e72
- Immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception. Committee Opinion No. 670.Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128: e32-e37
- Understanding patient preferences about immediate postpartum long-acting reversible contraception: a qualitative study.Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 129: 64Shttps://doi.org/10.3998/mjm.13761231.0004.111
- Accessibility of emergency contraception in California’s Catholic hospitals.Womens Health Issues. 2005; 15: 174-178https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2005.03.001
- Reproductive health care in Catholic facilities: a scoping review.Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: 105-115https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.000000000000003029
- Disclosure of religious identity and health care practices on Catholic hospital websites.JAMA. 2019; 321: 1103-1104https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2019.0133
- Are women aware of religious restrictions on reproductive health at Catholic hospitals? A survey of women’s expectations and preferences for family planning care.Contraception. 2014; 90: 429-434https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.06.035
- Do women know whether their hospital is Catholic? Results from a national survey.Contraception. 2018; 98: 498-503https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.05.017
- Referrals for services prohibited in Catholic health care facilities.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016; 48: 111-117https://doi.org/10.1363/48e10216
- Changing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate access at a faith-based institution.Contraception. 2011; 84: 280-284https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2010.12.003
- Obstetric and postpartum care in Illinois Catholic hospitals: impact and implications for patients with Medicaid insurance.The University of Chicago, Chicago2020
- “Perfectly healthy, but dead”: the myth of inter-rater reliability.Qual Health Res. 1997; 7: 445-447https://doi.org/10.1177/104973239700700401
- Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qual Res Psychol. 2006; 3: 77-101https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
- Thematic analysis: striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria.Int J Qual Methods. 2017; 16: 1-13https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
- Religious hospital policies on reproductive care: what do patients want to know?.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 218: 251.E1-251.E9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2017.11.595
- Women’s expectation of receiving reproductive health care at Catholic and non-Catholic hospitals.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2019; 51: 135-142https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12118
- Restrictions on reproductive care at Catholic hospitals: a qualitative study of patient experiences and perspectives.AJOB Empir Bioeth. 2020; 11: 257-267https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2020.1817173
- When there’s a heartbeat: miscarriage management in Catholic-owned hospitals.Am J Public Health. 2008; 98: 1774-1778https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2007.126730
- Patient views on religious institutional health care.JAMA Netw Open. 2019; 2: e1917008https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.17008
- Anticipatory counseling about miscarriage management in Catholic hospitals: a qualitative exploration of women’s preferences.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2020; 52: 171-179https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12157
- Obstetrician-gynecologists, religious institutions, and conflicts regarding patient-care policies.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 207: 73.E1-73.E5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2012.04.023
- Nursing practice: the ethical issues.Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ1984: 331
- Framing the issues: moral distress in health care.HEC Forum. 2012; 24: 1-11https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-012-9178-y
- Moral distress experienced by nurses: a quantitative literature review.Nurs Ethics. 2015; 22: 15-31https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733013502803
- Religious refusals to long-acting reversible contraceptives in Catholic settings: a call for evidence.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 222: S869.e1-S869.e5https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2019.11.1270
- Whose choice? Developing a unifying ethical framework for conscience laws in health care.Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 128: 391-395https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.00000000000001526
775 ILCS 55/Reproductive Health Act. 2021 [Available from: https://www.ilga.gov/legislation/ilcs/ilcs5.asp?ActID=3987&ChapterID=64].
Declaration of Competing Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding: This study was supported by the Pritzker Community Health Initiative.