Advertisement

Discrepant abortion reporting by interview methodology among men from the United States National Survey of Family Growth (2015-2017)

      Abstract

      Objective

      : To examine discrepancies in men's abortion reporting when queried via face-to-face interview versus audio computer-assisted self-interviewing (ACASI) in the National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).

      Study Design

      : The NSFG collects nationally representative data on family life, sexual behavior, and reproductive health in the United States. The questionnaire is administered to participants via face-to-face interview (FTF), with selected items also asked of the same participant via ACASI for direct comparison. As the 2015-2017 NSFG queried individuals’ abortion history via both methods, we examined discrepant reporting among respondents. We additionally explored sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics associated with discrepant abortion reporting in a multivariable logistic regression model.

      Results

      : Of 4540 male respondents ages 15-49, 45.3% reported a pregnancy. Via FTF, 12.3% reported an abortion, compared to 19.9% via ACASI (p < 0.01). With respect to discrepancies in the number of reported abortions, 8.5% of respondents reported more abortions via ACASI versus FTF. Multivariable logistic regression modeling noted independently greater odds of abortion reporting in ACASI among non-Hispanic Black men (aOR 2.31, 95% CI 1.19-4.45), men living below the Federal Poverty Level (less than 100% FPL: aOR 3.65, 95% CI 1.93-6.89; 100-400% FPL: aOR 2.04, 95% CI 1.20-3.45), and those desiring more children in the future (aOR 1.91, 95% CI 1.20-3.04).

      Conclusion

      : Men were more likely to disclose their abortions in ACASI compared to FTF interview. Disproportionate, discrepant abortion reporting among low-income, minority men who report desiring more children in the future warrants further research.

      Implications

      : Surveys utilizing ACASI as an adjunct to FTF interviews may more accurately capture men's abortion experience.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Jones RK
        • Jerman J.
        Population group abortion rates and lifetime incidence of abortion: United States, 2008-2014.
        Am J Public Health. 2017; 107 (Doi:): 1904-1909https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2017.304042
      1. Guttmacher Institute. 2008 Abortion Patient Survey (APS). Guttmacher Institute. https://www.guttmacher.org/population-center/dataset/2008-abortion-patient-survey-aps. [Accessed 01 January 2021].

        • Altshuler AL
        • Nguyen BT
        • Riley HEM
        • Tinsley ML
        • Tuncalp Ö.
        Male partners’ involvement in abortion care: a mixed-methods systematic review.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2016; 48 (Doi:): 209-219https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12000
        • Nguyen BT
        • Hebert LE
        • Newton SL
        • Gilliam ML
        Supporting women at the time of abortion: a mixed-methods study of male partner experiences and perspectives.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2018; 50 (Doi:): 75-83https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12059
        • Jones RK
        • Moore AM
        • Frohwirth LF.
        Perceptions of male knowledge and support among U.S. women obtaining abortions. women's.
        Heal Issues. 2011; 21 (Doi:): 117-123https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2010.10.007
        • Daugherty J.
        How young men at high risk of fathering an unintended birth talk about their procreative identities.
        J Fam Issues. 2016; 37 (Doi:): 1817-1842https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X14551176
        • Mula R.
        Hegemonic Masculinity and Reproductive Freedom.
        Tennessee J Race, Gender, Soc Justice. 2015; 4: 204-211
        • Gnambs T
        • Kaspar K.
        Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis.
        Behav Res Methods. 2014; 47 (Doi:): 1237-1259https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-014-0533-4
        • Couper MP
        • Berglund P
        • Kirgis N
        • Buageila S.
        Using Text-to-speech (TTS) for Audio Computer-assisted Self-interviewing (ACASI).
        Field Methods. 2016; 28 (Doi:): 95-111https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X14562350
        • Langhaug LF
        • Sherr L
        • Cowan FM.
        How to improve the validity of sexual behavior reporting: systematic review of questionnaire delivery modes in developing countries.
        Trop Med Int Heal. 2010; 15 (Doi:): 362-381https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3156.2009.02464.x
        • Ghanem KG
        • Hutton HE
        • Zenilman JM
        • Zimba R
        • Ghanem KG.
        Audio computer assisted self interview and face to face interview modes in assessing response bias among STD clinic patients.
        Sex Transm Infect. 2005; 81 (Doi:): 421-425https://doi.org/10.1136/sti.2004.013193
        • Des Jarlais DC
        • Paone D
        • Milliken J
        • Turner CF
        • Miller H
        • Gribble J
        • et al.
        Audio-computer interviewing to measure risk behavior for HIV among injecting drug users: A quasi-randomized trial.
        Lancet. 1999; 353 (Doi:): 1657-1661https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(98)07026-3
        • Lindberg L
        • Scott RH.
        Effect of ACASI on reporting of abortion and other pregnancy outcomes in the US National Survey of Family Growth.
        Stud Fam Plann. 2018; 49 (Doi:): 259-278https://doi.org/10.1111/sifp.12068
      2. National Survey of Family Growth. 2015-2017 NSFG - Public-Use Data Files 2021, Codebooks and Documentation n.d. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/nsfg/nsfg_2015_2017_puf.htm (accessed April 20, 2021).

        • Center for Health Statistics N
        2015-2017 National Survey of Family Growth (NSFG).
        Summary of Design and Data Collection Methods, Hyattsville, Maryland2015
      3. User's Guide Appendix 3c: 2017 2017-2019 National Survey of Family Growth Male Respondent File Recode Specifications n.d.

        • Marsiglio W.
        Male procreative consciousness and responsibility: a conceptual analysis and research agenda.
        J Fam Issues. 1991; 12 (Doi:): 268-290https://doi.org/10.1177/019251391012003002
      4. Browner CH. 2022 Situating Women's Reproductive Activities. n.d.

        • Saad Lydia
        Americans, in Theory, Think Larger Families Are Ideal.
        Gallup: Social and Policy Issues. July. Gallup, Inc., Washington, D.C.2018 (https://news.gallup.com/poll/236696/americans-theory-think-larger-families-ideal.aspx [Accessed 01 January 2022])
        • Pew Research Center
        Public Opinion on Abortion.
        Pew Research Center: Fact Sheet. Pew Research Center, Washington, DC2021 (https://www.pewforum.org/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/ [Accessed 01 January 2022])
      5. Granberg D. Family size preferences and sexual permissiveness as factors differentiating abortion. vol. 45. 1982.

        • Wilson SR
        • Brown NL
        • Mejia C
        • Lavori PW.
        Effects of interviewer characteristics on reported sexual behavior of California Latino couples.
        Hisp J Behav Sci. 2002; 24 (Doi:): 38-62https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986302024001003
        • Catania JA
        • Binson D
        • Canchola J
        • Pollack LM
        • Hauck W
        • Coates TJ.
        Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior.
        Public Opin Q. 1996; 60 (Doi:): 345-375https://doi.org/10.1086/297758
        • Dykema J
        • Diloreto K
        • Price JL
        • White E
        • Schaeffer NC.
        ACASI gender-of-interviewer voice effects on reports to questions about sensitive behaviors among young adults.
        Public Opin Q. 2012; 76 (Doi:): 311-325https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs021
        • Griffith DM
        • Brinkley-Rubinstein L
        • Bruce MA
        • Thorpe RJ
        • Metzl JM.
        The Interdependence of African American Men's Definitions of Manhood and Health.
        Fam Community Heal. 2015; 38 (Doi:): 284-296https://doi.org/10.1097/FCH.0000000000000079
        • Abrams JA
        • Maxwell ML
        • Belgrave FZ.
        Circumstances beyond their control: black women's perceptions of black manhood.
        Sex Roles. 2018; 79 (Doi:): 151-162https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-017-0870-8
      6. Keneally, Meghan. States passing abortion bans have among the lowest rates of women in power. ABC News. 15 May 2019. https://abcnews.go.com/US/states-passing-abortion-bans-lowest-rates-women-power/story?id=63050305 [Accessed 01 January 2022].

        • Pew Research Center
        A record number of women are serving in the 117th Congress | Pew.
        Pew Research Center: Gender & Leadership. Pew Research Center, Washington DC2021 (https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/01/15/a-record-number-of-women-are-serving-in-the-117th-congress/ [Accessed 01 January 2022])
        • United States Census Bureau
        U.S. Census Bureau QuickFacts. U.S. Census Bureau, Washington DC2021 (census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045221 [Accessed 01 January 2022])
      7. Durkin E, Benwell M. These 25 Republicans – all white men – just voted to ban abortion in Alabama. The Guardian. 14 May 2019. https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/may/14/alabama-abortion-ban-white-men-republicans. [Accessed 01 January 2022].

        • Reich JA
        • Brindis CD.
        Conceiving risk and responsibility: A qualitative examination of men's experiences of unintended pregnancy and abortion.
        Int J Mens Health. 2006; 5: 133-152
        • Everett BG
        • Myers K
        • Sanders JN
        • Turok DK.
        Male abortion beneficiaries: Exploring the long-term educational and economic effects of abortion among men who report teen pregnancy.
        J Adolesc Health. 2019; 65 (Doi:): 520https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JADOHEALTH.2019.05.001