Advertisement
Original Research Article| Volume 110, P16-20, June 2022

Preliminary side effect profile, safety, and tolerability of hormonal contraception among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy

      Abstract

      Objective(s)

      To characterize for the first time the side effect profile, safety, and tolerability of hormonal contraception among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy.

      Study Design

      We conducted a secondary analysis of data collected from participants in a three-arm randomized controlled trial (N = 138) aimed at increasing effective contraceptive use among women receiving opioid-agonist therapy. Participants in the 2 intervention conditions (n = 90) had free access to hormonal contraception at each of the 14 visits scheduled during the 6-month intervention. Contraceptive use and side effects were recorded at each visit; participants could change methods or discontinue use at any time. Verbatim side effects were classified using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) terminology.

      Results

      Of 67 participants reporting hormonal contraceptive use, 29 (43%) initiated implants, 14 (21%) intrauterine devices, 13 (19%) combined pills, 11 (16%) progestin-only pills, 10 (15%) injectables, 1 (2%) ring, and 1 (2%) patch; the average (±standard deviation) duration of use was 129 ± 55, 129 ± 60, 108 ± 62, 102 ± 61, 111 ± 31, 145, and 18 days, respectively. A total of 321 side effects were reported by 55 (82%) participants. Fifty (75%) participants reported menstrual cycle changes/uterine bleeding, followed by headaches (16, 24%), weight gain (15, 22%), and abdominal pain or nausea/vomiting (11, 16%). No serious side effects were reported. Twelve participants (18%) changed methods and 13 (19%) discontinued all hormonal contraceptive use.

      Conclusion(s)

      The hormonal contraceptive side effects reported by this small group of women receiving opioid-agonist therapy appear consistent with those reported by the general population, was generally well-tolerated, and did not raise safety concerns.

      Implications

      These results provide important preliminary evidence that hormonal contraceptive use produces a familiar side effect profile and is well-tolerated by women receiving opioid-agonist therapy, although studies with larger samples followed over longer periods of time with appropriate comparison conditions are needed to fully assess tolerability and safety.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • ASAM
        The ASAM national practice guideline for the treatment of opioid use disorder: 2020 focused update.
        J Addict Med. 2020; 14: 1-91https://doi.org/10.1097/ADM.0000000000000633
        • ACOG
        Patient-centered contraceptive counseling: ACOG committee statement number 1.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2022; 139: 350-353https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000004659
        • Dehlendorf C
        • Levy K
        • Kelley A
        • Grumbach K
        • Steinauer J.
        Women's preferences for contraceptive counseling and decision making.
        Contraception. 2013; 88: 250-256https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2012.10.012
        • Donnelly KZ
        • Foster TC
        • Thompson R.
        What matters most? The content and concordance of patients’ and providers’ information priorities for contraceptive decision making.
        Contraception. 2014; 90: 280-287https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.04.012
        • World Health Organization
        Medical eligibility criteria for contraceptive use.
        5th ed. World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland2015
        • Ti A
        • Stone RH
        • Whiteman M
        • Curtis KM.
        Safety and effectiveness of hormonal contraception for women who use opioids: a systematic review.
        Contraception. 2019; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.08.006
        • Heil SH
        • Melbostad HS
        • Matusiewicz AK
        • Rey CN
        • Badger GJ
        • Shepard DS
        • et al.
        Efficacy and cost-benefit of onsite contraceptive services with and without incentives among women with opioid use disorder at high risk for unintended pregnancy: A randomized clinical trial.
        JAMA Psychiatry. 2021; 05401: 1-8https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.1715
        • Weinhardt LS
        • Carey MP
        • Maisto SA
        • Carey KB
        • Cohen MM
        • Wickramasinghe SM.
        Reliability of the timeline follow-back sexual behavior interview.
        Ann Behav Med. 1998; 20: 25-30https://doi.org/10.1037/a0013262.Open
        • Weinhardt LS.
        Effects of a detailed sexual behavior interview on perceived risk of HIV infection: preliminary experimental analysis in a high risk sample.
        JBehavMed. 2002; 25: 195-203
      1. International Council for Harmonisation. Integrated addendum to ICH E6(R1): Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R2). 2016.

      2. Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. Management of safety information from clinical trials: Report of CIOMS working group VI. Geneva, Switzerland: 2005.

      3. International Council For Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. MedDRA: Medical dictionary for regulatory activities. 2019. https://www.meddra.org/ (accessed January 21, 2021).

      4. US Department of Health and Human Service Food and Drug Administration Center for Drug Evaluation and Research and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry. E9 statistical principles for clinical trials. Rockville, MD: 1998.

        • Whelton P
        • Carey R
        • Aronow W
        • Casey D
        • Collins K
        • Himmelfarb Dennison C
        • et al.
        2017 ACC/AHA/AAPA/ABC/ACPM/AGS/APhA/ASH/ASPC/NMA/PCNA Guideline for the prevention, detection, evaluation, and management of high blood pressure in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Pr.
        Hypertension. 2018; 71: e13-115
        • Diedrich JT
        • Desai S
        • Zhao Q
        • Secura G
        • Madden T
        • Peipert JF.
        Association of short-term bleeding and cramping patterns with long-acting reversible contraceptive method satisfaction.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 212 (e1-8): 50https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AJOG.2014.07.025
        • Wallach RC
        • Jerez E
        • Blinick G.
        Pregnancy and menstrual function in narcotics addicts treated with methadone. The Methadone Maintenance Treatment Program.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1969; 105: 1226-1229https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(69)90294-4
        • Schmittner J
        • Schroeder JR
        • Epstein DH
        • Preston KL.
        Menstrual cycle length during methadone maintenance.
        Addiction. 2005; 100: 829-836https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2005.01091.x
        • Fenn JM
        • Laurent JS
        • Sigmon SC.
        Increases in body mass index following initiation of methadone treatment.
        J Subst Abuse Treat. 2015; 51: 59-63https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2014.10.007
        • Okruhlica L
        • Slezáková S.
        Priberanie na hmotnosti pacientov v metadónovom udrziavacom programe ako návrat k populacnej norme [Weight changes of patients in methadone maintenance treatment during four years period].
        Cas Lek Ces. 2008; 147: 426-430
        • Kábrt J
        • Wilczek H
        • Svobodová J
        • Haluzík M
        • Kotrlíková E.
        Nutricní stav toxikomanů v metadonovém programu [Nutritional status of drug addicts in a methadone program].
        Cas Lek Ces. 1999; 138: 693-695
        • Gallo MF
        • Lopez LM
        • Grimes DA
        • Carayon F
        • Schulz KF
        • Helmerhorst FM.
        Combination contraceptives: Effects on weight.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; CD003987https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003987.PUB5
        • Lopez LM
        • Ramesh S
        • Chen M
        • Edelman A
        • Otterness C
        • Trussell J
        • et al.
        Progestin-only contraceptives: Effects on weight.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016; CD008815https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD008815.PUB4
      5. Merck & Co. I. Nexplanon [package insert] 2015.

      6. Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceutical Inc. Mirena [package insert] 2020.

      7. Pfizer. Depo-Provera contraceptive injection [package insert]. 2020.

      8. Aurobindo Pharma Limited. Afirmelle [package insert] 2017.

        • Sobel L
        • Lee YW
        • White KOC
        • Woodhams E
        • Patton E.
        Contraceptive decision making among pregnancy-capable individuals with opioid use disorder at a tertiary care center in Massachusetts.
        Contraception. 2021; 104: 355-360https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CONTRACEPTION.2021.06.002
        • Peipert JF
        • Zhao Q
        • Allsworth JE
        • Petrosky E
        • Madden T
        • Eisenberg D
        • et al.
        Continuation and satisfaction of reversible contraception.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 117: 1105-1113https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31821188ad
        • Teal S
        • Edelman A.
        Contraception selection, effectiveness, and adverse effects: A review.
        JAMA. 2021; 326: 2507-2518https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2021.21392