Abstract
Objective
Study Design
Results
Conclusions
Implications
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ContraceptionReferences
Centro Nacional de Equidad de Género y Salud Reproductiva (CNEGSR), Secretaría de Salud, Gobierno de México. Lineamiento Técnico para la atención del Aborto Seguro en México [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.gob.mx/salud/cnegsr/documentos/lineamiento-tecnico-para-la-atencion-del-aborto-seguro-en-mexico-274667
- “We don't want problems”: reasons for denial of legal abortion based on conscientious objection in Mexico and Bolivia.Reprod Health. 2021; 18: 44https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01101-2
- Inequalities in access to and quality of abortion services in Mexico: can task-sharing be an opportunity to increase legal and safe abortion care?.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2020; 150: 25-33
Gobierno de la Ciudad de México, Secretaría de Salud. Interrupción Legal del Embarazo (ILE) Estadísticas abril 2007 - 30 de septiembre 2021 Sistema de Información de Interrupción Legal del Embarazo [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021Oct 25]. Available from: http://ile.salud.cdmx.gob.mx/wp-content/uploads/WEB-21.pdf
- Contraception in the Era of COVID-19.Glob Health Sci Pract. 2020; 8: 2
- Telehealth interventions to improve obstetric and gynecologic health outcomes: a systematic review.Obstet Gynecol. 2020; 135: 371-382
- Safe abortion information hotlines: An effective strategy for increasing women's access to safe abortions in Latin America.Reprod Health Matters. 2015; 23: 47-57https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhm.2015.006.04
- Becoming the woman she wishes to be”: a qualitative study exploring the experiences of medication abortion acompañantes in three regions in Mexico.Contracept. 2022; 106: 39-44
- Reasons for using telemedicine medical abortion in Mexico and Chile.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021; (Published online first)https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2021-201280
World Health Organization (WHO). WHO Guideline on self-care interventions for health and well-being [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240030909
- Abortion care guideline.Geneva, 2022 (Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO)
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Implementing telehealth in practice [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2020/02/implementing-telehealth-in-practice/.
International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO). FIGO endorses the permanent adoption of telemedicine abortion services [Internet]. 2021 March [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.figo.org/sites/default/files/2021-03/FIGO%20Statement%20%E2%80%93%20FIGO%20endorses%20the%20permanent%20adoption%20of%20telemedicine%20abortion%20services_v6_0.pdf
Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. (RCOG). Telemedical abortion care: Safeguarding young people statement from the Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists (RCOG) and the British Society of Abortion Care Providers (BSACP) regarding the advent of telemedical abortion care and the safeguarding of young people [Internet]. 2021 [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2021-06-25-telemedical-abortion-care-and-the-safeguarding-of-young-people.pdf
- Safety of medical abortion provided through telemedicine compared with in person.Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 778-782
- Telemedicine for medical abortion: a systematic review.BJOG. 2019; 126: 1094-1102
- TelAbortion: evaluation of a direct to patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States.Contracept. 2019; 100: 173-177
- At-home telemedicine for medical abortion in Australia: a qualitative study of patient experiences and recommendations.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2020; 46: 159-160
- No-test medication abortion: a sample protocol for increasing access during a pandemic and beyond.Contracept. 2020; 101: 361-366
- Effectiveness, safety, and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.BJOG. 2021; 128: 1464-1474
- The COVID-19 pandemic and rapid implementation of adolescent and young adult telemedicine: challenges and opportunities for innovation.J Adolesc Health. 2020; 67: 164-171
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Coronavirus (COVID-19) infection and abortion care [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/2020-07-31-coronavirus-covid-19-infection-and-abortion-care.pdf/.
- Implementation guide for rapid integration of an outpatient telemedicine program during the COVID-19 pandemic.J Am Coll Surg. 2020; 231: 216-222
Centro Nacional de Excelencia Tecnológica en Salud (CENETEC). Acciones de telesalud en México [Internet]. 2020 [cited 2021 Oct 18]. Available from: https://cenetec-difusion.com/observatoriotelesalud/wp-content/uploads/2021/03/Acciones-de-Telesalud-en-Mexico-2020.pdf
- Telemedicine abortion during the COVID pandemic in Mexico City.Contracept. 2022; 109: 85
- Acceptability of no-test medical abortion provided via telemedicine during Covid-19: analysis of patient-reported outcomes.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021; 47: 261-268
- Over-the-counter oral contraceptive use among women in Mexico: results from a national survey.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021; 47: 205-210
- Early termination of pregnancy: differences in gestational age estimation using last menstrual period and ultrasound in Mexico.Reprod Health. 2020; 17: 89
- Expansion of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.Contracept. 2021; 104: 43-48https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.019
Article info
Publication history
Footnotes
Declaration of Competing Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Funding: The research was supported by an anonymous donor who was not involved in study design, analysis, or reporting.
