Advertisement

Complications of second trimester induction for abortion or fetal demise for patients with and without prior cesarean delivery

      Abstract

      Objective

      Compare complication rates of second trimester induction for abortion or fetal demise for patients with and without prior cesarean delivery.

      Study design

      Retrospective cohort study examining induction for abortion or fetal demise for pregnancies from 14w0d to 23w6d gestation at 2 urban academic medical centers from 2009 to 2019. Exclusion criteria included preterm labor or cervical insufficiency, neonatal interventions, or if misoprostol was not the primary induction method. Complication rates were compared between those with no prior, 1 prior, and 2 or more (2+) prior cesarean deliveries. Complications analyzed were retained placenta, failed induction, infection, hemorrhage, blood transfusion, uterine rupture, intensive care unit admission, death, and readmission. Secondary analysis included cumulative misoprostol dosages and complete abortion rate within 24 hours.

      Results

      Of 520 patients, 411 patients had no prior cesarean delivery, 77 had 1 prior cesarean delivery, and 32 had 2+ prior cesarean deliveries. Eleven patients had a prior vertical uterine incision. About 26.5% of all patients received mifepristone. The 2+ prior cesarean delivery group was significantly older (35 vs 32 vs 32, p < 0.001) and more likely to be induced for fetal demise (62.5 vs 41.56 vs 39.17%, p = 0.04). Both cesarean groups were more likely to be obese (58.62 vs 49.35 vs 34.26%, p = 0.003). Patients with 2+ prior cesarean deliveries were more likely to experience uterine rupture (6.25 vs 0 vs 0%, p = 0.004), and require ICU admission (6.45 vs 1.3 vs 0.49%, p = 0.02). Secondary analysis outcomes were similar. Logistic regression showed patients with 2+ prior cesarean deliveries were more likely to experience a complication than those with 1 prior (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 2.71, confidence interval [CI] 1.09–6.86, p = 0.03) or 0 prior cesarean deliveries (aOR 3.00, CI 1.30–7.02, p = 0.01). Patients with 1 prior or no prior cesarean deliveries had a similar risk of experiencing a complication (aOR 1.11, CI 0.64–1.89, p = 0.7).

      Conclusions

      Most patients with prior cesarean deliveries can safely undergo induction in the second trimester for abortion or fetal demise. Patients with 2+ prior cesarean deliveries had a higher rate of at least 1 complication when compared to those with one or no prior cesarean delivery, despite similar misoprostol dosages and rates of complete abortion.

      Implications

      This large 10-year retrospective study examines the impact of prior cesarean delivery on the safety of second trimester induction. While second trimester labor induction abortion remains an option for all patients, specialized counseling for patients with 2 or more prior cesarean deliveries may be warranted.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Vital statistics of the United States, 1990, vol I, natality. Washington: 1994. https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/vsus/nat90_1acc.pdf.

        • Martin JA
        • Hamilton BE
        • Ventura SJ
        • Osterman MJK
        • Kirmeyer S
        • Mathews TJ
        • et al.
        Births: final data for 2009.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2011; 60: 1-70
        • Martin JA
        • Hamilton BE
        • Osterman MJK
        • Driscoll AK.
        Births: final data for 2019.
        Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2021; 70: 1-51
        • Caughey AB
        • Cahill AG
        • Guise J-M
        • Rouse DJ.
        Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery.
        Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2014; 210: 179-193https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.026
        • Cunningham FG
        • Bangdiwala SI
        • Brown SS
        • Dean TM
        • Frederiksen M
        • Rowland Hogue CJ
        • et al.
        NIH consensus development conference draft statement on vaginal birth after cesarean: new insights.
        NIH Consens State Sci Statements. 2010; 27: 1-42
        • Jones RK
        • Jerman J.
        Abortion incidence and service availability in the United States, 2014.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 49: 17-27https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12015
        • Kerns J
        • Vanjani R
        • Freedman L
        • Meckstroth K
        • Drey EA
        • Steinauer J.
        Women's decision making regarding choice of second trimester termination method for pregnancy complications.
        Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2012; 116: 244-248https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.10.016
        • Lydon-Rochelle M
        • Holt VL
        • Easterling TR
        • Martin DP.
        Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 3-8https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM200107053450101
        • Landon MB
        • Hauth JC
        • Leveno KJ
        • Spong CY
        • Leindecker S
        • Varner MW
        • et al.
        Maternal and perinatal outcomes associated with a trial of labor after prior cesarean delivery.
        N Engl J Med. 2004; 351: 2581-2589https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040405
        • Berghella V
        • Airoldi J
        • O'Neill A
        • Einhorn K
        • Hoffman M
        Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean: a systematic review.
        BJOG. 2009; 116: 1151-1157https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2009.02190.x
        • Goyal V.
        Uterine rupture in second-trimester misoprostol-induced abortion after cesarean delivery.
        Obstetr Gynecol. 2009; 113: 1117-1123https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e31819dbfe2
        • Andrikopoulou M
        • Lavery JA
        • Ananth C v.
        • Vintzileos AM.
        Cervical ripening agents in the second trimester of pregnancy in women with a scarred uterus: a systematic review and metaanalysis of observational studies.
        Am J Obstetr Gynecol. 2016; 215: 177-194https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2016.03.037
        • Ngoc NTN
        • Shochet T
        • Raghavan S
        • Blum J
        • Nga NTB
        • Minh NTH
        • et al.
        Mifepristone and misoprostol compared with misoprostol alone for second-trimester abortion.
        Obstetr Gynecol. 2011; 118: 601-608https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e318227214e
        • Kapp N
        • Borgatta L
        • Stubblefield P
        • Vragovic O
        • Moreno N.
        Mifepristone in second-trimester medical abortion.
        Obstetr Gynecol. 2007; 110: 1304-1310https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000289577.32274.a5
      2. Illinois Maternal Morbidity and Mortality Report. 2018.

        • Jamali M
        • Bakhtiyari M
        • Arab F
        • Mirzamoradi M.
        Misoprostol complications in second-trimester termination of pregnancy among women with a history of more than one cesarean section.
        Obstetr Gynecol Sci. 2020; 63: 323-329https://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2020.63.3.323
        • Daskalakis GJ
        • Mesogitis SA
        • Papantoniou NE
        • Moulopoulos GG
        • Papapanagiotou AA
        • Antsaklis AJ.
        Misoprostol for second trimester pregnancy termination in women with prior caesarean section.
        BJOG. 2005; 112: 97-99https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00285.x
        • Fawzy M
        • Abdel-Hady E-S
        Midtrimester abortion using vaginal misoprostol for women with three or more prior cesarean deliveries.
        Int J Gynecol Obstetr. 2010; 110: 50-52https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2010.02.008