Advertisement

Non-barrier contraceptive use patterns among Latina adolescents attending California reproductive health centers: A longitudinal study

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To describe use of non-barrier contraceptives over a 9-month period, consistency in method use, and identify factors associated with method nonuse, switching, and consistency among Latina adolescents attending California sexual and reproductive health (SRH) centers.

      Study design

      We conducted a cohort study using data self-reported at baseline, and 3- and 9-months post-baseline. The analysis included 1162 sexually active adolescents aged 18 to 19 who self-identified as female and Latina, indicated that they were not currently pregnant or trying to become pregnant, and who attended California SRH centers between June 2016 and June 2020. We used binomial generalized multivariable linear models with a log link to assess the likelihood of nonbarrier method consistency, switching, and non-use.

      Results

      At baseline, 453 of 1162 (39%) of respondents were using short-acting methods (pill, patch, ring, or injection), 113 of 1162 (9.7%) were using long-acting methods (implants or intrauterine devices [IUDs]), and 596 of 1162 (51.3%) reported using neither short- nor long-acting methods. Over a 9-month period, 22/33 (66.7%) of those using IUDs consistently used the method, which was a statistically greater frequency of consistency than individuals who selected other nonbarrier methods (270/530 [50.9%], aRR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.11, 1.77). Implant users had rates of method consistency similar to users of other nonbarrier methods (aRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.89, 1.38). Factors independently associated with method consistency included being older, having never been pregnant, having greater perceived risk of pregnancy, and greater contraceptive knowledge.

      Conclusion

      Sexually active Latina adolescents attending California SRH centers who were not trying to become pregnant maintained consistent contraceptive use more frequently when using an IUD. Using a patient-centered approach, contraceptive counseling for Latina adolescents can describe the combined efficacy and contraceptive stability offered by IUDs should patients desire it.

      Implications

      This study addressees gaps in knowledge about U.S. Latina adolescents’ contraceptive use patterns. We demonstrate that IUD users, and not implant users, appear more likely to consistently use their method than those using non-LARC methods. Patient-centered contraceptive counseling for Latina adolescents can describe the greater contraceptive stability that IUDs may offer.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Kim TY
        • Dagher RK
        • Chen J.
        Racial/ethnic differences in unintended pregnancy: evidence from a national sample of U.S. women.
        Am J Prev Med. 2016; 50: 427-435https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2015.09.027
        • Kost K
        • Zolna M.
        Challenging unintended pregnancy as an indicator of reproductive autonomy: a response.
        Contraception. 2019; 100: 5-9https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.04.010
        • Stevenson AJ
        • Potter JE.
        Abortion access and state variation in observed unintended pregnancy.
        Contraception. 2015; 92: 227-233https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.04.003
        • Gerdts C
        • Dobkin L
        • Foster DG
        • Schwarz EB.
        Side effects, physical health consequences, and mortality associated with abortion and birth after an unwanted pregnancy.
        Women's Heal Issues. 2016; 26: 55-59https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2015.10.001
        • Foster DG
        • Biggs MA
        • Raifman S
        • Gipson J
        • Kimport K
        • Rocca CH.
        Comparison of health, development, maternal bonding, and poverty among children born after denial of abortion vs after pregnancies subsequent to an abortion.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2018; 172: 1053-1060https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.1785
        • Foster DG
        • Raifman SE
        • Gipson JD
        • Rocca CH
        • Biggs MA.
        Effects of carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term on women's existing children.
        J Pediatr. 2019; 205 (e1): 183-189https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2018.09.026
        • Stoddard A
        • McNicholas C
        • Peipert JF.
        Efficacy and safety of long-acting reversible contraception.
        Drugs. 2011; 71: 969-980https://doi.org/10.2165/11591290-000000000-00000
        • Trussell J.
        Contraceptive failure in the United States.
        Contraception. 2011; 83: 397-404https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2011.01.021
        • Winner B
        • Peipert JF
        • Zhao Q
        • Buckel C
        • Madden T
        • Allsworth JE
        • et al.
        Effectiveness of long-acting reversible contraception.
        N Engl J Med. 2012; 366: 1998-2007https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1110855
        • Cleland K
        • Peipert JF
        • Westhoff C
        • Spear S
        • Trussell J.
        Family planning as a cost-saving preventive health service.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 364: e37https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp1104373
        • American College of Obstetricians and Gynecoloists (ACOG)
        ACOG Committee Opinion No. 735: adolescents and long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauterine devices.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 131: e130-e139https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000002632
        • Braverman PK
        • Adelman WP
        • Alderman EM
        • Breuner CC
        • Levine DA
        • Marcell AV
        • et al.
        Contraception for adolescents.
        Pediatrics. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-2299
        • Grace KT
        • Anderson JC.
        Reproductive coercion: a systematic review. trauma, violence.
        Abus. 2018; 19: 371-390https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838016663935
        • Gilliam ML.
        Beyond coercion: let us grapple with bias.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 915-916https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001116
        • Szucs LE
        • Lowry R
        • Fasula AM
        • Pampati S
        • Copen CE
        • Hussaini KS
        • et al.
        Condom and contraceptive use among sexually active high school students - Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United States, 2019.
        MMWR. 2020; 69 (Suppl): 11-18https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.su6901a2
        • Craig AD
        • Dehlendorf C
        • Borrero S
        • Harper CC
        • Rocca CH.
        Exploring young adults’ contraceptive knowledge and attitudes: disparities by race/ethnicity and age.
        Women's Heal Issues. 2014; 24: e281-e289https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2014.02.003
        • Dehlendorf C
        • Park SY
        • Emeremni CA
        • Comer D
        • Vincett K
        • Borrero S.
        Racial/ethnic disparities in contraceptive use: variation by age and women's reproductive experiences.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210 (e1-526.e9): 526https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2014.01.037
      1. Abma JC, Martinez GM. Sexual activity and contraceptive use among teenagers in the United States, 2011-2015. 2017.

        • Desrosiers F
        • Arden M
        • Fisher M.
        Patterns of contraception choice among Hispanic and non-Hispanic female adolescents.
        Int J Adolesc Med Health. 2013; 25: 167-170https://doi.org/10.1515/ijamh-2013-0025
        • Daniels K
        • Abma JC.
        Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019.
        NCHS Data Brief. 2020; : 1-8
        • Cohen R
        • Sheeder J
        • Kane M
        • Teal SB.
        Factors associated with contraceptive method choice and initiation in adolescents and young women.
        J Adolesc Heal. 2017; 61: 454-460https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.04.008
        • Jackson AV
        • Karasek D
        • Dehlendorf C
        • Foster DG.
        Racial and ethnic differences in women's preferences for features of contraceptive methods.
        Contraception. 2016; 93: 406-411https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2015.12.010
        • Simmons R
        • Sanders J
        • Geist C
        • Gawron L
        • Myers K
        • Turok D.
        Predictors of contraceptive switching and discontinuation within the first 6 months of use among Highly Effective Reversible Contraceptive Initiative Salt Lake study participants.
        Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 220 (e1-376.e12): 371https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.022.Predictors
        • Murray Horwitz ME
        • Pace LE
        • Ross-Degnan D
        Trends and disparities in sexual and reproductive health behaviors and service use among young adult women (Aged 18-25 Years) in the United States, 2002-2015.
        Am J Public Health. 2018; 108: S336-S343https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2018.304556
        • Gilliam ML
        • Warden M
        • Goldstein C
        • Tapia B.
        Concerns about contraceptive side effects among young Latinas: a focus-group approach.
        Contraception. 2004; 70: 299-305https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2004.04.013
        • Carvajal DN
        • Gioia D
        • Mudafort ER
        • Brown PB
        • Barnet B.
        How can primary care physicians best support contraceptive decision making? A qualitative study exploring the perspectives of Baltimore Latinas.
        Women's Heal Issues. 2017; 27: 158-166https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2016.09.015
        • Carvajal DN
        • Klyushnenkova E
        • Barnet B.
        Latina contraceptive decision-making and use: the importance of provider communication and shared decision-making for patient-centered care.
        Patient Educ Couns. 2021; : 1-6https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2021.03.006
        • Yee L
        • Simon M.
        The role of the social network in contraceptive decision-making among young, African American and Latina Women.
        J Adolesc Heal. 2010; 47: 374-380https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.03.014
        • Gilliam ML
        • Mph AN
        • Whitaker A
        • Familial Kozloski M.
        Cultural and psychosocial influences of use of effective methods of contraception among mexican-american adolescents and young adults.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2011; 24: 79-84https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2010.10.002
        • Finer L
        • Zolna M.
        Declines in unintended pregnancy in the United States, 2008–2011.
        N Engl J Med. 2016; 374: 843-852https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575
      2. Kost K, Maddow-Zimet I, Arpaia A. Pregnancies, births, and abortions among adolescents and young women in the United States, 2013: National and State trends by age, race, and ethnicity. 2017. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa1506575.

        • Jenner E
        • Walsh S
        • Henley C
        • Demby H
        • Leger R
        • Falk G.
        Randomized trial of a sexual health video intervention for black and hispanic adolescent females.
        Manuscr Submitt Publ. 2022;
        • Usinger KM
        • Gola SB
        • Weis M
        • Smaldone A.
        Intrauterine contraception continuation in adolescents and young women: a systematic review.
        J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol. 2016; 29https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpag.2016.06.007
        • Dehlendorf C
        • Foster DG
        • de Bocanegra HT
        • Brindis C
        • Bradsberry M
        • Race Darney P.
        Ethnicity and differences in contraception among low- income women: methods received by family PACT Clients, California, 2001–2007.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Heal Reprod Heal. 2011; 43: 181-187https://doi.org/10.1363/4318111.Race
        • Badolato GM
        • Sadeghi N
        • Goyal MK.
        Racial and ethnic disparities in receipt of sexual health care and education among a nationally representative sample of adolescent females.
        J Racial Ethn Heal Disparities. 2021; 23https://doi.org/10.1007/s40615-021-01079-4
        • Agénor M
        • Pérez AE
        • Wilhoit A
        • Almeda F
        • Charlton BM
        • Evans ML
        • et al.
        Contraceptive care disparities among sexual orientation identity and racial/ethnic subgroups of U.S. women: a National probability sample study.
        J Women's Heal. 2021; 30https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2020.8992
        • Jackson AV
        • Wang L-F
        • Morse J.
        Racial and ethnic differences in contraception use and obstetric outcomes: a review.
        Semin Perinatol. 2017; 41: 273-277https://doi.org/10.1053/J.SEMPERI.2017.04.003
        • Carvajal DN
        • Zambrana RE.
        Challenging stereotypes: a counter-narrative of the contraceptive experiences of low-income Latinas.
        Heal Equity. 2020; 4: 10-16https://doi.org/10.1089/heq.2019.0107
        • Guzzo KB
        • Hayford SR.
        Adolescent reproductive and contraceptive knowledge and attitudes and adult contraceptive behavior.
        Matern Child Health J. 2018; 22: 32-40https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-017-2351-7
        • Cicerchia G
        • Reid LD
        • Carvajal DN.
        Contraceptive decision-making and the importance of side effect information among a sample of Latinas.
        Women's Heal Rep. 2022; 3: 78-84https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2021.0115
        • Gomez AM
        • Fuentes L
        • Allina A
        Women or LARC First? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014; 46: 171-175https://doi.org/10.1363/46e1614
      3. Realizing reproductive health equity needs more than Long-Acting Reversible Contraception (LARC).
        Am J Public Health. 2016; 106: 2015-2016https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2015.302900
        • Higgins JA.
        Celebration meets caution: LARC ’s boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach.
        Contraception. 2014; 89: 237-241https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.027
        • Gold R.
        Guarding against coercion while ensuring access: a delicate balance.
        Guttmacher Policy Rev. 2014; 17: 8-14
        • Jones RK
        • Tapales A
        • Lindberg LD
        • Frost J.
        Using longitudinal data to understand changes in consistent contraceptive use.
        Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2015; 47: 131-139https://doi.org/10.1363/47e4615
        • Ross LJ.
        Reproductive justice: an introduction.
        University of California Press, Berkeley2017
        • Ross LJ
        • Brownlee SL
        • Diallo DD
        • Rodriguez L
        • Roundtable L.
        The “Sistersong Collective”: women of color, reproductive health and human rights.
        Am J Health Stud. 2001; 17: 79