Purchase one-time access:Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
One-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
- Committee opinion no. 654: reproductive life planning to reduce unintended pregnancy.Obstet Gynecol. 2016; 127: e66-e69https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001314
- Recommendations to improve preconception health and health care–United States. A report of the CDC/ATSDR preconception care work group and the select panel on preconception care.MMWR Recomm Rep. 2006; 55: 1-23
Department of Health and Human Services. Healthy people 2020 topics and objectives: family planning, http://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics-objectives/topic/family-planning; 2022 (accessed April 22, 2022).
- Addressing organizational barriers to adolescent access to high-quality, low-cost, confidential sexual and reproductive health services in a community health center.Health Promot Pract. 2021; (Published online January 15)1524839920985505https://doi.org/10.1177/1524839920985505
- Factors affecting contraception access and use in patients with opioid use disorder.J Clin Pharmacol. 2020; 60: S63-S73https://doi.org/10.1002/jcph.1772
- Perceptions of barriers to effective family planning services among women with disabilities.Disabil Health J. 2021; 14101055https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2020.101055
- Perceived barriers and facilitators to accessing and utilizing sexual and reproductive healthcare for people who experience homelessness: a systematic review.BMJ Sex Reprod Health. 2021; 47: 211-220https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2020-200799
- Socioeconomic differences persist in use of permanent vs long-acting reversible contraception: an analysis of the National Survey of Family Growth, 2006 to 2010 vs 2015 to 2017.Contraception. 2021; 103: 246-254https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.12.008
- Impact of state-level reproductive health legislation on access to and use of reproductive health services and reproductive health outcomes: a systematic scoping review in the affordable care act era.Womens Health Issues. 2020; 31: 114-121https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2020.11.005
- Sexual orientation differences in pregnancy and abortion across the lifecourse.Women's Health Issues. 2020; 30: 65-72https://doi.org/10.1016/j.whi.2019.10.007
- Factors influencing contraception use in sexual minority women: A systematic literature review [Master's alternative plan paper.Cornerstone: A Collection of Scholarly and Creative Works for Minnesota State University, Mankato, Minnesota State University, Mankato]2021 (https://cornerstone.lib.mnsu.edu/etds/1091/ (accessed April 22, 2022))
- Disparities and change over time in distance women would need to travel to have an abortion in the USA: a spatial analysis.Lancet Public Health. 2017; 2: e493-e500https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(17)30158-5
- Distance traveled to obtain clinical abortion care in the United States and reasons for clinic choice.J Women's Health (Larchmt). 2019; 28: 1623-1631https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.7496
- ACOG committee opinion no. 586: health disparities in rural women.Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 123: 384-388https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000443278.06393.d6
- Trends in the provision of preventive women's health services by family physicians.Fam Med. 2011; 43: 166-171
- The family physician workforce: the special case of rural populations.Am Fam Physician. 2005; 72: 147
- v. Jackson Women's Health Organization et. al. 597. State Health Officer of the Mississippi Department of Health, 2022
- Patient opinions on sexual and reproductive health services in primary care in rural and urban clinics.Contraception. 2022; 114 (Epub 2022 Apr 27. PMID: 35489391): 26-31https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.04.009
- Rural-Urban Continuum Codes.2020 (https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes.aspx (accessed April 22, 2022))
- Evaluating the development, implementation and dissemination of a multisite card study in the WWAMI region practice and research network.Clin Transl Sci. 2015; 8: 764-769https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12312
- Research electronic data capture (REDCap)–a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support.J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42: 377-381https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2008.08.010
- The REDCap consortium: building an international community of software platform partners.J Biomed Inform. 2019; 95103208https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103208
Wood S, Strasser J, Sharac J, Wylie J, Tran T, Rosenbaum S. Community health centers and family planning in an era of policy uncertainty, https://www.kff.org/report-section/community-health-centers-and-family-planning-in-an-era-of-policy-uncertainty-report; 2018 (accessed April 22, 2022).
- A Biopsy Came With An Unexpected $2,170 “Cover Charge” For The Hospital.NPR, 2019 (https://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2019/09/30/764795892/a-biopsy-came-with-an-unexpected-2-170-cover-charge-for-the-hospital (accessed April 22, 2022))
- Patient perspectives on quality family planning services in underserved areas.Patient Exp J. 2017; 4: 54-65https://doi.org/10.35680/2372-0247.1194
- Integrating reproductive planning with primary health care: an exploration among low-income, minority women and men.Sex Reprod Healthc. 2010; 1: 37-43https://doi.org/10.1016/j.srhc.2010.01.001
- Primary care patients’ preferences for reproductive health service needs assessment and service availability in New York federally qualified health centers.Contraception. 2020; 101: 226-230https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2019.12.003
- Physician density by specialty type in urban and rural counties in the US, 2010 to 2017.JAMA Netw Open. 2021; 4e2033994https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.33994
- Women's preferences for the location of abortion services: a pilot study in two Chicago clinics.Matern Child Health J. 2012; 16: 212-216https://doi.org/10.1007/s10995-010-0722-4
- Patient attitudes toward early abortion services in the family medicine clinic.J Am Board Fam Med. 2008; 21: 162-164https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2008.02.070158
- Abortion incidence and service availability In the United States, 2014.Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2017; 49: 17-27https://doi.org/10.1363/psrh.12015
- How far did US women travel for abortion services in 2008?.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2013; 22: 706-713https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2013.4283
- Out-of-state travel for abortion following implementation of Texas senate bill 8.Tex Policy Eval Proj. 2022; (https://sites.utexas.edu/txpep/files/2022/03/TxPEP-out-of-state-SB8.pdf (accessed August 6, 2022))
- Racial/ethnic and educational inequities in restrictive abortion policy variation and adverse birth outcomes in the United States.BMC Health Serv Res. 2021; 21: 1139https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-07165-x
- Abortion surveillance — United States, 2019.MMWR Surveill Summ. 2021; 70: 1-29https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.ss7009a1
- Outcomes and safety of history-based screening for medication abortion.JAMA Intern Med. 2022; (Published online March 21)https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.0217
- Effectiveness, safety and acceptability of no-test medical abortion (termination of pregnancy) provided via telemedicine: a national cohort study.BJOG. 2021; 128: 1464-1474https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.16668
Society of Family Planning. Interim clinical recommendations: contraceptive provision when healthcare access is restricted due to pandemic response.; 2020. doi:10.46621/UYGR2287
- Association of telehealth reimbursement parity with contraceptive visits during the covid-19 pandemic.JAMA Netw Open. 2022; 5e226732https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.6732
- Farmworker justice, campesinos sin Fronteras, vista community clinic.Promise Telehealth. 2018; (https://www.farmworkerjustice.org/resource/the-promise-of-telehealth-increasing-access-to-quality-healthcare-in-rural-america/ (accessed August 6, 2022))
- Transforming rural health care: high-quality, sustainable access to specialty care.Health Affairs Blog. 2015; (https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/transforming-rural-health-care-high-quality-sustainable-access-to-specialty-care/ (accessed August 6, 2022))
- Expansion of a direct-to-patient telemedicine abortion service in the United States and experience during the COVID-19 pandemic.Contraception. 2021; 104: 43-48https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.03.019
- Contraceptive procedures in internal medicine clinics and resident education: a qualitative study of implementation methods, barriers, and facilitators.J Gen Intern Med. 2021; 36: 3346-3352https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-021-06832-3
- Residency training in long-acting reversible contraceptive methods.JAMA Intern Med. 2017; 177: 1061https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2017.2101
- Training nurses in contraceptive implant procedures: implications for practice in Australia.Collegian. 2021; 28: 114-120https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colegn.2020.04.005
- Counseling and provision of long-acting reversible contraception in the US: National survey of nurse practitioners.Prev Med. 2013; 57: 883-888https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2013.10.005
- Complex family planning - demarginalizing abortion care requires uplifting primary care and non-CFP providers.Contraception. 2022; 105: 86https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2021.05.023
- Why Are Fellow OB-GYNs Making My Job as an Abortion Provider Even More Difficult?.Rewire News Group, 2021 (https://rewirenewsgroup.com/article/2021/12/18/why-are-fellow-ob-gyns-making-my-job-as-an-abortion-provider-even-more-difficult/ (accessed April 22, 2022))
ACGME. ACGME program requirements for graduate medical education in complex family planning. https://www.acgme.org/globalassets/pfassets/programrequirements/236_complexfamilyplanning_2020-06-13.pdf; 2020 (accessed April 22, 2022).
Publication stageIn Press Corrected Proof
Conflicts of interest: None.
Funding: This study was supported by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health under Award Number UL1 TR002319, KL2 TR002317, and TL1 TR002318 . The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.