Advertisement

Clinical interventions are more accurate than quantitative measurements for defining hemorrhage with dilation and evacuation

      Abstract

      Objectives

      To assess if quantitative blood loss (QBL) with dilation and evacuation (D&E) procedures correlated with clinically relevant outcomes or hemorrhage.

      Study design

      We used a de-identified database to review D&E procedures performed at UC Davis Health from April 2019 through March 2020. Surgeons determined QBL during procedures and estimated blood loss, when excessive, during post-procedure recovery. We extracted patient demographic and procedure-related information. We defined clinically relevant bleeding as cases with bleeding-related interventions within 24 hours post-procedure including use of ≥2 uterotonics, tranexamic acid administration, cervical injury requiring repair, uterine balloon tamponade, blood transfusion, uterine artery embolization, hospitalization, or return to operating room; the latter 5 criteria defined hemorrhage. We used χ2 test for trend to evaluate bleeding outcomes.

      Results

      We evaluated 431 procedures with a mean gestational age of 19 weeks and 3 days. Clinically relevant bleeding outcomes occurred in 6/319 (2%), 15/97 (15%) and 7/12 (58%) patients with total blood loss <250mL, 250−500mL and >500mL, respectively (p<0.0001); 11 had bleeding related to cervical injuries. Hemorrhage occurred in 0, 4/97 (4%) and 5/12 (42%) patients, respectively (p<0.0001). Patients with relevant bleeding outcomes had QBLs ranging from 150−1800mL (median QBL 312.5mL, interquartile range [IQR] 250−550mL) while those without clinically relevant bleeding ranged from 10−900mL (median QBL 150mL, IQR 75−200mL).

      Conclusion

      Most patients (75%) with clinically relevant bleeding outcomes had QBL ≤500mL. Although higher QBL correlates with clinical interventions, the need for significant interventions rather than a single blood loss amount should be used to define hemorrhage with D&E procedures.

      Implications

      Clinical hemorrhage is best defined by the necessary clinical interventions required to manage bleeding rather than any quantified amount of blood loss.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Zane S
        • Creanga AA
        • Berg CJ
        • Pazol K
        • Suchdev DB
        • Jamieson DJ
        • et al.
        Abortion-related mortality in the United States: 1998-2010.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2015; 126: 258-265https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000000945
        • Altman AM
        • Stubblefield PG
        • Schlam JF
        • Loberfeld R
        • Osathanondh R.
        Midtrimester abortion with laminaria and vacuum evacuation on a teaching service.
        J Reprod Med. 1985; 30: 601-606
        • Castleman LD
        • Oanh KT
        • Hyman AG
        • Thuy le T
        • Blumenthal PD
        Introduction of the dilation and evacuation procedure for second trimester abortion in Vietnam using manual vacuum aspiration and buccal misoprostol.
        Contraception. 2006; 74: 272-276https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.021
        • Frick AC
        • Drey EA
        • Diedrich JT
        • Steinauer JE.
        Effect of prior cesarean delivery on risk of second-trimester surgical abortion complications.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 115: 760-764https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181d43f42
        • Patel A
        • Talmont E
        • Morfesis J
        • Pelta M
        • Gatter M
        • Momtaz MR
        • et al.
        Adequacy and safety of buccal misoprostol for cervical preparation prior to termination of second-trimester pregnancy.
        Contraception. 2006; 73: 420-430https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2005.10.004
        • Schulz KF
        • Grimes DA
        • Christensen DD.
        Vasopressin reduces blood loss from second trimester dilatation and evacuation abortion.
        Lancet. 1985; 2: 353-356https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92496-1
        • Serapio ET
        • Pearlson GA
        • Drey EA
        • Kerns JL.
        Estimated versus measured blood loss during dilation and evacuation: an observational study.
        Contraception. 2018; 97: 451-455https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.01.008
        • Diaz V
        • Abalos E
        • Carroli G.
        Methods for blood loss estimation after vaginal birth.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018; 9CD010980https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD010980.pub2
        • Kerns J
        • Steinauer J.
        Management of postabortion hemorrhage: release date November 2012 SFP Guideline #20131.
        Contraception. 2013; 87: 331-342https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.10.024
        • Williamson PR
        • Altman DG
        • Blazeby JM
        • Clarke M
        • Gargon E.
        The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative.
        Trials. 2011; 12 (Suppl): A70https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-6215-12-S1-A70
        • Williamson P
        • Clarke M.
        The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) initiative: its role in improving cochrane reviews.
        Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012; ED000041https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.ED000041
        • Hsia JK
        • Schimmoeller NR
        • Cansino CD
        • Hou MY
        • Jensen HM
        • Creinin MD.
        Prospective quantification of fetomaternal hemorrhage with dilation and evacuation procedures.
        Contraception. 2019; 99: 281-284https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.11.015
        • Whitehouse K
        • Tschann M
        • Soon R
        • Davis J
        • Micks E
        • Salcedo J
        • et al.
        Effects of prophylactic oxytocin on bleeding outcomes in women undergoing dilation and evacuation: a randomized controlled trial.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133: 484-491https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000003104
        • Kerns JL
        • Pearlson G
        • Mengesha B
        • Harter K
        • Jackson RA
        • Drey EA.
        A randomized controlled trial of methylergonovine prophylaxis after dilation and evacuation abortion.
        Contraception. 2021; 103: 116-120https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2020.10.009