Abstract
Objectives
Study Design
Results
Conclusion
Keywords
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to ContraceptionReferences
- The prevalence and impacts of crisis pregnancy center visits among a population of pregnant women.Contraception. 2018; 98: 69-73https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2018.02.016
- Why Crisis Pregnancy Centers Are Legal but Unethical.AMA J Ethics. 2018; 20: 269-277https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2018.20.3.pfor1-1803
- Abortion misinformation from crisis pregnancy centers in North Carolina.Contraception. 2012; 86: 752-756https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2012.06.001
- Women’s Experiences with Crisis Pregnancy Centers.Contraception. 2017; 96: 276https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2017.07.057
- What women seek from a pregnancy resource center.Contraception. 2016; 94: 168-172https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2016.04.003
State Laws California. 2022 [cited 2022 April 25]; Available from: 〈https://www.prochoiceamerica.org/state-law/california/〉.
Swartzendrube , A. Crisis Pregnancy Center Map 2018 3/17/2020]; Available from: 〈http://www.crisispregnancycentermap.com〉.
Crisis Pregnancy Centers. 2020 3/18/2020]; Available from: 〈https://www.californiaprolife.org/crisis-pregnancy-centers/〉.
- Risk factors associated with presenting for abortion in the second trimester.Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 107: 128-135https://doi.org/10.1097/01.AOG.0000189095.32382.d0
- Patient perspectives on barriers in obtaining timely abortion care in Los Angeles, California.Contraception. 2023; 117: 50-54https://doi.org/10.1016/j.contraception.2022.08.003