Advertisement
Original Research Article|Articles in Press, 110057

State restrictions on abortion are associated with fewer abortions in patients with high-risk cardiovascular conditions

  • Alice Abernathy
    Correspondence
    Corresponding author.
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Courtney A. Schreiber
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
    Search for articles by this author
  • Sindhu K. Srinivas
    Affiliations
    Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States

    Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States
    Search for articles by this author

      Abstract

      Objectives

      Patients with modified World Health Organization (mWHO) class IV cardiovascular conditions are at high risk of severe maternal morbidity and mortality in pregnancy and are advised to avoid pregnancy or consider abortion if they become pregnant. We aimed to determine if state-level abortion policy is associated with receiving an abortion in this high-risk population.

      Study design

      We conducted a descriptive retrospective cross-sectional study of abortion among people 15-44 years of age with mWHO class IV cardiovascular conditionsstate policy on abortion using US claims data from United health Group from 2017 to 2020.

      Results

      There was a statistically significant association between restrictive abortion policy at that state level and lower number of pregnancies ending in abortions in this high-risk group.

      Conclusions

      States with the most restrictive abortion policy have the lowest proportion of pregnancies ending in abortion among patients with mWHO class IV cardiovascular conditions.

      Implications

      Variation in receiving abortion by state of residence among patients with mWHO class IV cardiovascular conditions may indicate an impending rise in severe maternal morbidity and mortality related to cardiovascular disease in pregnancy, and the risk factor is where a person lives. This trend may be exacerbated by the Supreme Court Decision Dobbs v Jackson Women’s Health.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Contraception
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Creanga A.A.
        • Syverson C.
        • Seed K.
        • Callaghan W.M.
        Pregnancy-related mortality in the United States, 2011-2013.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2017; 130: 366-373
        • Hollier L.M.
        • Martin J.N.
        • Connolly H.
        • Turrentine M.
        • Hameed A.
        • Arendt K.W.
        • et al.
        ACOG practice bulletin summary number 212: pregnancy and heart disease.
        Obstet Gynecol. 2019; 133 (Accessed May 1, 2022): 1067-1072
        • Regitz-Zagrosek V.
        • Blomstrom Lundqvist C.
        • Borghi C.
        • Cifkova R.
        • Ferreira R.
        • Foidart J.M.
        • et al.
        ESC guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy: the Task Force on the Management of Cardiovascular Diseases during Pregnancy of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC).
        Eur Heart J. 2011; 32 (Accessed May 1, 2022): 3147-3197
      1. State abortion policy landscape: from hostile to supportive. Guttmacher Institute, 2022 (Accessed May 1, 2022)
        • Lindo J.M.
        • Myers C.
        • Schlosser A.
        • Cunningham S.
        How far is too far? New evidence on abortion clinic closures, access, and abortions. 2017 (Accessed May 1, 2022)
        • Brown B.P.
        • Hebert L.E.
        • Gilliam M.
        • Kaestner R.
        Association of highly restrictive state abortion policies with abortion rates, 2000-2014.
        JAMA Netw Open. 2020; 3 (Accessed May 1, 2022): e2024610
        • Gibbs S.E.
        • Oakley L.P.
        • Harvey S.M.
        Development and validation of a claims-based measure of abortion services.
        J Eval Clin Pract. 2020; 26 (Accessed May 1, 2022): 1383-1388
        • Ailes E.C.
        • Simeone R.M.
        • Dawson A.L.
        • Petersen E.E.
        • Gilboa S.M.
        Using insurance claims data to identify and estimate critical periods in pregnancy: an application to antidepressants.
        Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2016; 106 (Accessed May 1, 2022): 927-934
      2. Jones R.K., Finer L.B., Singh S., Miller A., Boonstra P., Donovan S., et al. Characteristics of U.S. abortion patients, 2008; 2010. Accessed May 1, 2022 〈www.guttmacher.org〉.

      3. Regulating insurance coverage of abortion. Guttmacher Institute, 2023 (Accessed May 1, 2022)